SMBM II: Defense of Yoshi's Island (Final! MVPs announced!)

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:06 pm

In post 1472, hiplop wrote:
In post 1463, Isa wrote:Why are you confirmed town...

multiple reasons, now bus sunset

no. YOU vote PM.

manho · Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:28 pm

In post 1443, chkflip wrote:I love that 3/4 on manho's list are lurkers. Nice job blending in, scum.

Not.

because scums always lurk.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:35 pm

oh how wrong you are.

scum can be active too.

hiplop · Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:36 pm

In post 1475, Kcdaspot wrote:
In post 1472, hiplop wrote:
In post 1463, Isa wrote:Why are you confirmed town...

multiple reasons, now bus sunset

no. YOU vote PM.

no. YOU vote Sunset

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:39 pm

In post 1478, hiplop wrote:
In post 1475, Kcdaspot wrote:
In post 1472, hiplop wrote:
In post 1463, Isa wrote:Why are you confirmed town...

multiple reasons, now bus sunset

no. YOU vote PM.

no. YOU vote Sunset

later. PM > Sunset with warrior/vifam discussion tomorrow

FTR, if warrior doesn't die vifam is not a lock for scum by any means.

my only reasoning is bastardmod.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:39 pm

that statement CAN work vice versa

hiplop · Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:45 pm

gr.

fine

VOTE: PM

sorryy man

warriormode · Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:05 pm

In post 1479, Kcdaspot wrote:
In post 1478, hiplop wrote:
In post 1475, Kcdaspot wrote:
In post 1472, hiplop wrote:
In post 1463, Isa wrote:Why are you confirmed town...

multiple reasons, now bus sunset

no. YOU vote PM.

no. YOU vote Sunset

later. PM > Sunset with warrior/vifam discussion tomorrow

FTR, if warrior doesn't die vifam is not a lock for scum by any means.

my only reasoning is bastardmod.

I don't want to see a reason like that if I live tomorrow. This is no good.

1. You can't try to to account for bastardmod thats ridiculous.

2. We already have two completely BS excuses from Vifam that I can't believe people buy, you don't need to come up with another for him.

I'm definitely expecting everyone to lynch vifam tomorrow, no more excuses.

chkflip · Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:09 pm

This would be the second attempt at a death-flip connecting to "confirm" scum as town. Just a thought.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:23 pm

In post 1482, warriormode wrote:
I don't want to see a reason like that if I live tomorrow. This is no good.

1. You can't try to to account for bastardmod thats ridiculous.

2. We already have two completely BS excuses from Vifam that I can't believe people buy, you don't need to come up with another for him.

I'm definitely expecting everyone to lynch vifam tomorrow, no more excuses.

I get your case. vifam: YOU VISIT ME YOU DIE TOMORROW NIGHT lol.

So what IS he?

a... one shot, reaction poisoner?

That's kind of far-fecthed however you spell it.) even for a bastard mod. It seem both more likely and easy for say a mafia watcher to watch himself, see you and say OMG INVESTIGATIVE ROLE. KILL HIM TOMORROW NIGHT.

But as it stands this argument is incredibly swingy. there are points for town v. scum on both sides and even points for town on town. I'd rather see what happens first.

But by the by, I don't like your reaction. The more this goes the scummier it feels. Yes this means i'm siding with Vifam on this. Let me put it like this: if you flip VT or get janitored or something weird, Vifam would come under HEAVY FIRE.

Long story short if he's not telling the truth he's dying no matter what.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:27 pm

In post 1483, chkflip wrote:This would be the second attempt at a death-flip connecting to "confirm" scum as town. Just a thought.

which won't work if all scenario's are explored. There is no way right now to say "this person is 100% scum if X happens" in this whole situation.

Xeras · Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:48 am

Wait. Are we going with a ProjectMatt lynch again?

I feel as if a manho lynch is better. ~^

warriormode · Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:25 am

In post 1471, Isa wrote:WARRIORMODE. READS. NOW.

Alright I gave you my reads, so let me ask you something...

Why didn't you ask for Vifam's reads? I don't see his reads anywhere today...

See where I'm getting at?

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:08 am

In post 1486, Xeras wrote:Wait. Are we going with a ProjectMatt lynch again?

I feel as if a manho lynch is better. ~^

manho is the VI.

what game you playin?

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:09 am

Warrior: respond to 1484 plz.

Xeras · Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:09 am

In post 1488, Kcdaspot wrote:
In post 1486, Xeras wrote:Wait. Are we going with a ProjectMatt lynch again?

I feel as if a manho lynch is better. ~^

manho is the VI.

what game you playin?

VI as in village idiot right? I don't see someone that has played that many games being able to slip by on a VI excuse.

Isa · Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:26 am

In post 1487, warriormode wrote:
In post 1471, Isa wrote:WARRIORMODE. READS. NOW.

Alright I gave you my reads, so let me ask you something...

Why didn't you ask for Vifam's reads? I don't see his reads anywhere today...

See where I'm getting at?

Because if you look over the course of the game, Vifam has given reads on more than one person, which you had not (the only exception being David Xanatos) up until that post. You had tunneled on Vifam for the entire game, refusing to give reads or even participate in anything not directly involving you.

warriormode · Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 9:54 am

I'm talking about today Isa.
Vifam started today by getting everyone to claim even though he was only looking for me, then we've been tunneling each other since.
I'm pretty sure his "reads" would change if he's town.

@kcda- are you asking me what I think his role is?

projectmatt · Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:58 pm

I'd like everyone to see chikflip clinging to an illogical fallacy and creating false hopes and then proceeding to ignore any contradiction or false statement he made when called out. Cool.

hiplop · Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:44 pm

ok guys

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:22 pm

In post 1492, warriormode wrote:I'm talking about today Isa.
Vifam started today by getting everyone to claim even though he was only looking for me, then we've been tunneling each other since.
I'm pretty sure his "reads" would change if he's town.

@kcda- are you asking me what I think his role is?

i just wanna see what you think about my post.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:23 pm

In post 1494, hiplop wrote:ok guys

what?

Kcdaspot · Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:25 pm

hello?

chkflip · Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:34 pm

In post 1493, projectmatt wrote:I'd like everyone to see chikflip clinging to an illogical fallacy and creating false hopes and then proceeding to ignore any contradiction or false statement he made when called out. Cool.

Sorry, I have a tendency to ignore scum-reads. Post numbers?

TheJakalope · Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:35 pm

Question. Why is the day not over?