No, I usually don't.
In post 793, Johhog wrote:And whatever, you might as well say why I am scummy so I have something to comment on.
OK.
What you said, divided by sentence.
In post 790, Johhog wrote:RedPanda is confirmed town.
Lurconis is probably town too.
His thoughts about Parama is interesting and while he wouldn't be my first choice Parama may be a lynch after all.
Chair is town for #788 so I won't vote him today after all.
Zangscum needs to get lynched, but I doubt we can get enough votes for him.
PeregrineV perhaps? I thought it would be better to leave him alive for later but I dunno, he's scummy too.
Just to make it clear on the whole thing, I think RedPanda is probably town, but disagree on confirmed. Also agree on Lurconis, mostly due to role but also play seems solid.
Then you say he's not your first choice, but that you'd be OK with lynching Parama. Since this isn't day1 or a large game, I find this attitude scummy. (I'm still mostly null-leaning-town-leaning-null on Parama, mostly due to role)
Chair cannot "be town" for a single post. But, you say he's town then you say you won't vote him
today
?!? You can think he's "more town than before", "less town than before", or about the same, but saying he's town, but then indicating that you're willing to lynch him on day 5 just seems like an ultimate fencesit, all in one sentence. (Myself, I disliked Chair's early game play, but feel better about his later game play).
Then, Zang is scum and needs to be lynched. But then you say "I doubt we can get enough votes for him". But, as you yourself pointed out, you don't give cases or reasons, so why would you expect people to vote Zangscum when you "can't" say why he is scum? (I read Zang both ways, but won't give reasons until I hear some from you).
Then, "leave me alive for later"? What does that mean? Because it sounds like you have some control over where the game goes, which sounds like you know more than us.
After looking closely, it seems like what you are finally saying is you think there is scum in me, Parama and Zang. I understand giving reads, but I don't like:
1. No reasons for any of it, yet you are asking why people are voting you.
2. The way you say it, which doesn't sound to me like it comes from town.
