Mini 1247- Auction Mafia: Abandoned

Voidedmafia · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:55 am

In post 499, sorgster wrote:sheeping for the 4th time hiplop.

Nevermind that he has a good reason to vote Soda?

Vote: Soda

bv310 · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:56 am

I believe my vote's still where it needs to be, but I'd love to see a VC

sorgster · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:56 am

Vote Soda

hiplop · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:00 am

In post 499, sorgster wrote:sheeping for the 4th time hiplop.

pretty clearly laid out that i will vote you or soda today, and thats all ive done. No need to do anything else

GreyICE · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:14 am

In post 499, sorgster wrote:sheeping for the 4th time hiplop.

In post 502, sorgster wrote:
Vote Soda

I doooo not understand these posts back to back.

I like my vote on Peregrine

sorgster · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:17 am

In post 500, Voidedmafia wrote:
In post 499, sorgster wrote:sheeping for the 4th time hiplop.

Nevermind that he has a good reason to vote Soda?

Vote: Soda

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:19 am

right that was dumb lol. i dont have any power tonight so if you lynch me it's not the end of the world (but seriously don't lynch me)

Magua · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:19 am

Unofficial vote count:

SodaSpirit17 (4): Lurconis, hiplop, Voidedmafia, sorgster
Sorgster (3): Magua, bv310, SodaSpirit17
GreyICE (1): PeregrineV
Voidedmafia (1): Shanba
PeregrineV (1): GreyICE

Not voting (1): DeathRowKitty

sorgster wrote:@Magua, I'll give you my investigation during bargain phase under the condition that you investage person y, will say who y is later in pm during bargain phase and that you must post your investigation results here as soon as Day 3 starts.

Agreed, as long as Person Y isn't bv310. UNVOTE: Sorgster.

Sodaspirit's vote on sorgster in #492/493 would've been hammer except that GreyICE unvoted in #488.

@Soda:

Why did you say "sorry if I hammered" when you voted?

DeathRowKitty needs a prod. The mod also needs a prod.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:20 am

unvote

eb4p: because i didn't have a clue where the votes were at.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:22 am

'tis why you ask for a votecount, and THEN vote, Soda.

GreyICE · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:28 am

In post 509, Voidedmafia wrote:'tis why you ask for a votecount, and THEN vote, Soda.

Sooooooooo is he scum or dumb?

Voidedmafia · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:33 am

In post 510, GreyICE wrote:
In post 509, Voidedmafia wrote:'tis why you ask for a votecount, and THEN vote, Soda.

Sooooooooo is he scum or dumb?

Both.

GreyICE · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:36 am

Now why we should be lynching Peregrine, 101:

Peregrine has done lots to speculate on the setup and 'organize the town' but his only two pushes were Magua (for reasons that included 'didn't have an RVS') and on me. Note his vote on me is for not explaining something, but when I explained it to BV, his commentary was... err...
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 5#p3505105

Welp, hasn't made any. Now he's sitting there twiddling his thumbs. He's yet to comment on whether Sorg's scummy. But I'm scummy for waiting a day to lynch him. He has yet to comment on... really a whole bundle of things. He just sits there talking about powers and claims.

PEdit: Uh... not that I love quickhammer attempts, but do explain.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:44 am

Scum for attempting to quickhammer without a care. Dumb scum for not keeping track of the votecount.

I mean, if you're gonna pull that, you'd at least want some way to get out of it?

Magua · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:21 pm

Peregrine is town, GreyICE. Move on with your life.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:05 pm

lol it was an attempt?

i wouldn't say so..

since sorgster isn't being lynvched today

VOTE: DeathRowKitty

Voidedmafia · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:20 pm

In post 515, SodaSpirit17 wrote:lol it was an attempt?

i wouldn't say so..

since sorgster isn't being lynvched today

VOTE: DeathRowKitty

...uh-huh..

Let's see:

You come back here with nothing but a vote.

Said vote has a previous sentence that you may very well have put to just say "Hey, it was an accident!"

And you didn't bother to keep up with the VC.

How is it NOT an attempt?

Magua · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:59 am

Definitely not hammering soda at this point in time. His investigation result on bv310 + the speed that the wagon built on him are both holding me back.

Seriously prodding the mod, however.

sorgster · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:44 am

WHO IS THE BACKUP MOD?

PeregrineV · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:16 am

@GreyIce- part of it was your ability to have any answers whatsoever to Sorgsters hypotheticals.

In post 356, GreyICE wrote:
In post 353, sorgster wrote:
In post 349, Magua wrote:That's all I wanted to know.

sorgster is mafia then. He was roleblocked last Night.

1. There are more than one scum. More than any one of them could have done the killing action.
2. Scum may need to be able to buy the powerups to use the actions.
3.Scum could have targeted empking as well.
4.Scum could have attacked whoever bought bulletproof.
5.Who was protected by the protect action? They could have been a target.

1) -_-
2) Unlikely given setup
3) No
4) No
5) Emphatically not

Scumclaim, lynch.

Specifically 4 and 5. You claimed to have nothing else, yet you know protect was not used? Stuff like that where you "know" and I don't know, I need explained to me. Otherwise, I feel you have inside knowledge (ie scum).

GreyICE · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:19 am

Isn't this a completely different reason than the first reason you voted for me?

sorgster · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:20 am

Someone could have more than one reason for voting someone.

PeregrineV · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:01 am

In post 520, GreyICE wrote:Isn't this a completely different reason than the first reason you voted for me?

It's actually a combination.

GreyICE · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:04 am

In post 521, sorgster wrote:Someone could have more than one reason for voting someone.

I'm curious why you're asking me about this now, two weeks after I posted that.

I'll happily explain, but it's... odd timing... to say the least.

sorgster · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:11 am

Regardless of how strange the timing is , can you answer peregrine's question?