In post 210, SleepyKrew wrote:Those kinds of posts are a case-by-case basis. I think for trekker, it's scummy.
what did you mean by this then?
I'm not sure; he's probably an alt (I initially thought of crypto but don't now), but I don't think so.
In post 210, SleepyKrew wrote:Those kinds of posts are a case-by-case basis. I think for trekker, it's scummy.
In post 273, Amrun wrote:Cautious at first, but quick to vote later. c_p's posts just don't feel genuine. I've said as much before, but I'll say it again.
In post 276, SleepyKrew wrote:No I haven't. Have you?
In post 275, Fruit Basket wrote:
I'm not sure; he's probably an alt (I initially thought of crypto but don't now), but I don't think so.
In post 271, SleepyKrew wrote:Except trekker's inquisition is obvfake because I'd been calling him scum for a while before his question.
In post 192, ScreamingHawk wrote:Did I? My bad. I had pig in mind for a vote for a while. Must never have gone through with it
In post 288, fatlikepig wrote:Quil, your case on me is bad and you should feel bad.
Minimal contribution is definitely a scumtell when what you have contributed is scummy. As for my case not being there, the scummy aspects of C_P's early posts should have been fairly obvious. I delivered on that anyway, and I don't see why you're dismissing that just because it came later (hey, do I get to dismiss the rest of your case too? I mean, you didn't post any of this when you voted for me, right?).
Not going to bother with the rest of it, since ISO/meta on me shows that the rest of the case is baloney.
Why is trekker town when he has been calling people scum all game with no reasons?
Why are you voting for me if you have SH as leaning scum and me as null-leaning-scum? Shouldn't your vote be on the person you find most scummy?
In post 192, ScreamingHawk wrote:Did I? My bad. I had pig in mind for a vote for a while. Must never have gone through with it
The more I think about this, the more I think it's a scumslip. Town shouldn't be "planning" votes. Scum "plan" votes because they need to pin stuff on town. I'm pretty happy with my vote on SH now.
In post 11, Cross_Pollination wrote:Remind me why we're all voting for him already someone?
In post 55, Cross_Pollination wrote:I'm gonna wait a while before I vote. Haven't noticed anything suspicious as of yet.
In post 129, Cross_Pollination wrote:I wanna see someone get killed
In post 59, Cross_Pollination wrote:Nobody Special seems like a troll of some sort. Other than that, I've got nothing on him. Oh well, it's better than nothing.
VOTE: Nobody Special
In post 86, Cross_Pollination wrote:And I found his posts suspicious.