In post 719, kuribo wrote: In post 689, chunkykev wrote:I would say DGB is one of the worst because she has continually ignored my questions and continued to post reads with no reasons behind them.
oh bullshit, she can't answer your questions if she's not reading the game / half-assing it / whatever she's doing
also, your post assumes that she gives enough of a damn to make a change to her style just because you asked her to
Firstly, how could I have known she was not “reading the game / half-assing it / whatever she's doing”? I don’t know her personal life and she only posted about that after I had put my vote down. I have explained this already…
In post 689, chunkykev wrote:When I put my vote down, she was online and I was hoping to get an immediate reaction after continually being ignored. I did, and it didn't address any of my concerns. All she said was she didn't care and still gave no reasons for her previous reads so I am happy to keep my vote where it is just now.
Secondly, I have very little experience on mafiascum, but I do play elsewhere, and where I normally play, if someone asks you a direct question you should answer it. Town have nothing to hide and no need to avoid answering questions put to them. Goofball’s has only after my vote given any reason as to why she hasn’t answered me, but she still hasn’t answered me or addressed any of my concerns.
Should she be treated differently due to her real life issues? I would say no. I feel for her, but in the context of the game, she shouldn’t be treated any differently that anyone else. If she can’t play the game due to real life issues then I’m sure nobody would have any problem with her asking to be replaced.
---
In post 724, kuribo wrote: In post 703, xRECKONERx wrote: In post 696, Hinduragi wrote:Do you REALLY think Grimmjow's town or are you defending him because you're boyfriends?
He has legitimately done nothing scummy or worthy of suspicion, and the way everyone wants to keep throwing shit his way screams apathetic lurkerhunt instead of genuine scumhunting.
I agree with this. Grimm's no scummier than say, MME who's obviously flaking, or Shattered who's a retard, or that guy whose name escapes me that asked to be replaced like ten pages ago
It's pretty obviously shooting fish in a barrel.
I've got to agree with Reck and Kuribo here. I'm not saying Grimm is town, but he hasn't done anything yet which makes me think he is more likely scum than many others.
---
In post 726, Max wrote:No Daykill Has OccuredI have included the vote in #702 for consistency
Hindu, couple of questions. Firstly, I pointed out your "vote" in 702 due to your misquoting yet you haven't corrected it. Why?
Also, could you explain your pretend day vig play - reason for doing it and where you got the idea from, what reaction you expected and your conclusions?
---
In post 728, elvis_knits wrote:Everyone who just celebrated the fake vig death of chunkykev should be voting him.
For those that commented (Reck, Kuribo), I'm curious to know if you were happy for me to be killed as you believe I am scum, or you were happy for a daykill to move the game on (a genuine day kill of me would have had a good chance of Hindu being lynched).
---
In post 744, Lowell wrote:Not sure why the wagon on sleepless seems to have fizzled out. unvote, vote chunky. Let's see if this one can stick instead.
Thanks for joining us, Lowell. Really helpful post there as usual. If you genuinely believe me to be scum then why not tell everyone why so they can support my lynch? I just don’t understand the logic of voting with no reason. Clearly that is something I will need to get used to here, as many are guilty of it, but I don’t need to like it and I still can’t think of any town motivation for doing it.
---
In post 745, kuribo wrote:Problem with that is, I do agree with him on that point--- but this isn't MD, and you're not going to change the playstyle of those that do this.
I don’t know anyone’s normal playstyle so I’m not going to just ignore someone as that is how they normally play. On that, is that how DGB normally plays? I’ve not looked at her old games or anything but didn’t somebody comment that she usually does give more detail (I may be mistaken, I’ll need to look through and try and find the comment).
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He did finally drop a vote onto DGB for this, but... what? This wasn't worthy of a god damn vote until he was called out for not voting and until Shattered QuoteTags, Elli, Fate, and I were already on the wagon.
I hope I have now covered that (again) at the start of this post. My vote was absolutely nothing to do with being “called out” for not voting. It was to pressure DGB after what I viewed as more scummy play, and the fact she was online and posting at the time.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:Why accuse someone of not answering your attacks when you already know they're barely reading the game? I mean, listen, I personally think if DGB has too much shit going on in her life to give this game the attention it needs, she should just replace out and we'd all understand. Not like her slot's in a fucked position anyway. But to try and paint it as if she's intentionally ignoring you? That's disingenuous as all fuck.
Again, look at the order things happened. DGB didn't post anything about her real life problems until after I had put a vote on her.
In post 745, kuribo wrote:He doesn't even express an interest in Shittered QuoteTags until after it's pointed out that he's been ignoring people who aren't DGB.
You've got to be joking. If you are trying to build a case against me, how about actually looking at the facts?
I voted DGB in post #637 and being accused of ignoring people that are not DGB happened after that (in post #678 and is clearly wrong). I’ve “expressed an interest” in Shattered in post #296 and #572, and I even asked Shattered to respond to my earlier posts in post #656, in the very same post I responded to DGB and before I was accused of ignoring people that are not DGB.
So why did you claim I hadn’t expressed an interest in Shattered until after I was wrongly accused of focusing just on DGB? Deliberately ignoring the facts to make me look bad or a genuine mistake?
In post 745, kuribo wrote:I really don't like how chunky seems to be trying to modify his shit to adapt to the criticisms he's called out on.
Is this referring to my vote again? I've already explained my reasoning and how it was not associated with Khan's comments about me not voting (no matter who or when I voted for after that criticism, someone was always going to accuse me of only voting due to being called out for not voting) and I haven't modified my play in any way so I can't think what else you could still be referring to.
