Mini 1265: Wickedestjr's Mini Normal- Game Over

Uphill · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:03 pm

In post 22, Timeater wrote:
Vote: Uphill

"Trying to get Soben lynched" - Why? What for?

NOT ADMITTING JUST WAGONING

No shit? That's so obvious Ray Charles could see it, and Ray Charles is dead.

Timeater wrote:"What's
not
up with your vote?"

"OH LOOK AT ME I HAVE A VOTE AND YOU DONT, HO HO HO" weak deflection indicative of non-town motivations

Timeater: 1
Strawman: 0

Nice avoiding the question btw

Timeater wrote:"It's better than no lynch" - What the fuckmuffins?

Lynching an unknown is better than not lynching. Hence why I'm trying to do the former.

Votecount 1.1:

Soben - [2] - Odysseus, Uphill
Uphill - [2] - Katty Bard, Timeater
Odysseus - [1] - ScreamingHawk

Not Voting - [8] - bionicchop2, DemonHybrid, el simo, Gen_Wolf, redtail896, Soben, treznor, Yonzy

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch or 7 to no-lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2011-11-09 11:01:07)

Uphill · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:14 pm

In post 24, Katty Bard wrote:also, random lynches (and policy lynches especially) are bad, you rarely learn anything. More often than not, randomlynching hits a townie and is driven by scum + sheeptown who don't want to no-lynch.

Unless, of course, said scum is clumsy-herpin', in which case it's not random and scum gets lynched

HOLY INFORMATION INSTEAD OF ANALYSIS BATMAN

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Katty Bard

Katty Bard · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:15 pm

lol you're just reaching now. My post was designed to explain to the masses why you are scum.

Odysseus · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:17 pm

Uphill is town.

unvote, unvote

vote katty bard

Katty Bard · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:21 pm

In post 28, Odysseus wrote:Uphill is town.

how come? Still not satisfied with soben vote.

el simo · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:25 pm

In post 26, Uphill wrote:also, random lynches (and policy lynches especially) are bad, you rarely learn anything. More often than not, randomlynching hits a townie and is
driven by scum
+ sheeptown who don't want to no-lynch.

Did you read what you posted? A wagon driven by scum... how is that not useful information?

In post 22, Timeater wrote:
Vote: Uphill

"Trying to get Soben lynched" - Why? What for?

NOT ADMITTING JUST WAGONING

"What's
not
up with your vote?"

"OH LOOK AT ME I HAVE A VOTE AND YOU DONT, HO HO HO" weak deflection indicative of non-town motivations

"It's better than no lynch" - What the fuckmuffins?

noobscum caught, who's next?

I sincerely hope you aren't serious.

Vote: Timeater

Odysseus · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:26 pm

Because Uphill aggression reads as town, and he has already brought up some good points against you.

Also, he isn't voting Soben anymore and it was an RVS vote (pretty sure) to start out with so youre pretty much not accomplishing anything with that stance.

One of you and Tim are probably scum, both your pushes on him seem really fucking forced. Not to mention Uphill is 100% right, all you did was spit theory there. However Retro and I discussed it and Time <-> Kat interactions already make that pair very unlikely, I highly doubt they would both push this aggressively on the same person. So wha we have right now is

0-1 scum in Kat/Time, fairly sure there's 1 there.

Uphill is town.

Carry on.

Uphill · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:47 pm

In post 27, Katty Bard wrote:lol you're just reaching now. My post was designed to explain to the masses why you are scum.

That's weird, I could have sworn that post doesn't mention my alignment even once. Now you're saying you posted it to explain why I am scum?

KATTY LYNCH

FULL THROTTLE

NO EXCUSES

In post 30, el simo wrote:
In post 26, Uphill wrote:also, random lynches (and policy lynches especially) are bad, you rarely learn anything. More often than not, randomlynching hits a townie and is
driven by scum
+ sheeptown who don't want to no-lynch.

Did you read what you posted?

As a matter of fact, I did read what I posted, and it sure as hell wasn't that

DemonHybrid · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:49 pm

Vote: Timeater

and this is completely serious. 22 is so fucking terribad.

did you really think that was anything BUT starting conversation? oh, you didn't, because you're trying to pin blame on him when the game didn't even leave page fucking 1.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:51 pm

Uphill is town but Katty gets a solid null because I've seen players of both alignments go "oh, derp, what the fuck is this vote" with no other words, explanations or questions in RVS, but they never took it as far as timeater did

Gen_Wolf · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:00 pm

Vote: El Simo

Sounds scummy

Soben · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:37 pm

Still haven't heard from Scumhunter since signing up for this game but I'm sure he'll turn up soon enough. In the meantime Uphill and Timeater are very much town and anyone that believes that Timeaters aggression is scummy should read any of his previous games. I'm also leaning towards Odysseus being town as well but that's a much weaker read. Don't have any strong scum-reads but Kattys IoA and push on Uphill over nothing reads as scummy.

Vote: Katty Bard

treznor · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:58 am

Timeeater and Katty fighting sounds more like a townie fight to me at the moment. Dunno.

VOTE: el_simo for old-times sake

redtail896 · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:14 am

In post 31, Odysseus wrote:Because Uphill aggression reads as town, and he has already brought up some good points against you on

What good points? The only point was IIoA, which doesn't fit here because the information was very relevant.

VOTE: Odysseus

Also: why do you find 22 so bad DH? Just seems overly aggressive to me, not really scummy.

Timeater · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:28 am

"UPHILL IS TOWN"

TALK ABOUT PULLING TOWNREADS OUT OF YOUR ASS

Timeater · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:36 am

That's weird, I could have sworn that post doesn't mention my alignment even once. Now you're saying you posted it to explain why I am scum?

KATTY LYNCH

FULL THROTTLE

NO EXCUSES

Are you serious with this?

You guys are seriously seeing this as noobtown and not noobscum?

Timeater · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:39 am

In post 37, treznor wrote:Timeeater and Katty fighting sounds more like a townie fight to me at the moment. Dunno.

VOTE: el_simo for old-times sake

vote: treznor

random vote outside of the RVS

utterly non-comittal with reads or contributions

treznor · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:58 am

My vote isn't going to stay on el_simo, just wanted to pick on him a bit as we ran into each other in our last game

unvote

Timeater · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:10 am

What do you think of Katty Bard, treznor?

treznor · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:30 am

I'm more inclined to think of you and Katty Bard as town-fighting at the moment

Timeater · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:40 am

How exactly are we fighting?

And does "town-fighting" mean?

bionicchop2 · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:56 am

VOTE: treznor for RVing after discussion had started and then immediately unvoting when timeeater called them out on it.

FoS

Gen_Wolf for also RVing after discussions had start it. Was 1st to do this, but treznor is slightly scummier for backing off and actually unvoting it.

Waiting for vote count to see if odysseus is actual double voter. I assume so since there is no good reason to fake it.

bionicchop2 · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:57 am

In post 44, treznor wrote:I'm more inclined to think of you and Katty Bard as town-fighting at the moment

Also, this is a rather bold statement since there is very little information on either.

Town read on both already?

Timeater · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:08 am

I'd also like to note Treznor just powerlurked out of the game. Scum.

treznor · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:10 am

In post 46, bionicchop2 wrote:VOTE: treznor for RVing after discussion had started and then immediately unvoting when timeeater called them out on it.

FoS
Gen_Wolf for also RVing after discussions had start it. Was 1st to do this, but treznor is slightly scummier for backing off and actually unvoting it.

Waiting for vote count to see if odysseus is actual double voter. I assume so since there is no good reason to fake it.

It wasn't a random vote, I voted for el_simo because he's the only person I know here and there was no possibility of him being lynched at the time. I thought it was pretty clear that it was a flippant vote when I placed it and I stuck around to unvote later on to make sure the vote didn't lead to anything.