Mini 1241: Lab Mafia (Game Over)

4nxi3ty · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:09 am

yeah since there is no prs, lynching today or tommorow is about the same; i would advocate the former.

Riceballtail · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:33 pm

Well, we don't KNOW of any PRs anyway.

Debating the NL theory. Not sure it's the smartest with only one scum down.

Empking · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:33 pm

Vote Count 4.2

2. charter
7. Riceballtail
8. Fenix
9. 4nxi3ty

Not Voting: charter Riceballtail Fenix 4nxi3ty

4nxi3ty · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 am

rbt wanting to be confirmed town yesterday was bugging me.

anybody else?

Riceballtail · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:19 am

I'm obviously not anymore, since the scum faction is werewolves. Until a flip, we had to assume the scum were toting guns.

charter · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:43 am

Reread, I see actions that point towards both Fenix and Anxiety being scum. As far as I'm concerned, RBT is town just by process of elimination.

Some of the things I find suspicious about them:
Both had retarded fakeclaims, Fenix's is much scummier.
Anxiety's terrible vote for L day one.
Anxiety totally ignores Nanook during the later stages of the game, they have some unconvincing distancing in the beginning.
Fenix's play all game has been extremely passive and in my opinion never once actually tried to find scum or do much of anything useful. I find him lurky towards the end of the game (and in the beginning would only comment on lurkers).

Right now, if I had to vote, it would be Fenix. His total lack of scumhunting all game is quite damning. I will be going back and organizing my thoughts some more, but there is about zero chance I will vote RBT.

Fenix · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 7:12 pm

In post 501, Riceballtail wrote:Well, we don't KNOW of any PRs anyway.

What exactly are you implying?

In post 504, Riceballtail wrote:Until a flip, we had to assume the scum were toting guns.

I beg to differ.

In post 243, Empking wrote:
Maxous was eaten. He was a Vanilla Townie.

In post 382, Empking wrote:
Chkflip was eaten Night Two. He was a Vanilla Townie.

The first time RBT and Nanook had an interaction at all was day 3, when RBT suggested a massclaim with the notion s/he was town. This post in particular looks like Nanook speaking on RBT's behalf. The majority of that interaction is light accusations, RBT never once calls Nanook out on his own or votes him, instead grouping him with other suspected candidates.

Riceballtail · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:55 pm

Love the smear campaign 4nx and Fenix are running here.

At this point, you should realize that the battle is between the two of you. Charter isn't voting me anytime soon.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:25 am

In post 507, Riceballtail wrote:Love the smear campaign 4nx and Fenix are running here

you see the problem here, right?

you are painting both me and fenix as scummy when there is only one scum left.

if charter isn't gonna vote you than a no-lynch might be the best course of action.

Riceballtail · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:18 am

Both Charter and I are saying you two are the scum candidates. All that going into night will do is remove one of us from the picture, which is relatively futile in the long run.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 4:52 am

it is not futile, it shortens our list of suspects; which is something that scum want to avoid.

charter · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:03 am

Wow, once again your brilliant logic solves the game. Congrats.

charter · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:05 am

How about instead of continually posting and not doing anything, you post a case on who you think is suspicious so we all know your reasons.

Right now, both you and Fenix are doing nothing, and it's making it difficult to sort out which of you is the scum.

charter · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:28 am

Vote Fenix

What it boils down to,
I didn't get the impression Anxiety interacted with Nanook any differently than anyone else.
Fenix's claim was totally not town. He did absolutely nothing with it, it was just a ploy to earn town points.
I don't think Fenix even once mentioned Nanook. Not sure how I missed that before.
All other reasons I've mentioned about Fenix.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:35 am

are you blind? nanook was actively pushing mine and fenix's lynch, process of elimination leaves you and rbt.

@fenix, what is your read on charter?

Fenix · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:40 am

In post 514, 4nxi3ty wrote:@fenix, what is your read on charter?

Neutral scum. He hasn't done anything all game, and then he blames the rest of us for lack of content when all three of us have each provided more content than him. While lurking and not contributing isn't an explicit scumtell, long term it can be. He also hasn't strongly pushed for any lynch except mine. RBT's provided less content and has more scum-based interactions with Nanook. I believe RBT is much more likely to be scum.

charter · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:19 am

Fenix, point to what you've done so far this game. Point to where you have mentioned Nanook as well.

Riceballtail · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Sat Oct 29, 2011 2:46 pm

Fenix and 4nx should make a case on each other.

Now.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:17 am

you and charter are the ones that need to make a case. charter has already started a case on fenix, so you need to get going.

charter · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:26 pm

Why are you above making a case?

Riceballtail · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:26 pm

In post 518, 4nxi3ty wrote:you and charter are the ones that need to make a case. charter has already started a case on fenix, so you need to get going.

You need to convince me as to why you aren't scum. Thus, you need to make fenix scummier.

Get to it, or get noose.

4nxi3ty · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:24 am

In post 520, Riceballtail wrote:
In post 518, 4nxi3ty wrote:you and charter are the ones that need to make a case. charter has already started a case on fenix, so you need to get going.

You need to convince me as to why you aren't scum.
Thus, you need to make fenix scummier
.

Get to it, or get noose.

@charter, look rbt is not even scumhunting she just wants me to lynch fenix.

i will provide an analysis of every remaining player once rbt makes one case (which she hasn't done all game).

charter · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:37 am

Well, I want to lynch Fenix, so I really don't have any problem with that. Why don't

you

want to lynch Fenix?

charter · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:38 am

There's no reason to wait on RBT, go ahead and start contributing now.

Riceballtail · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:39 am

I don't need a case to lynch someone. You are in a 1v1 with fenix. This is what both Charter and I are telling you.

At this point I'm thinking Fenix just for not being here at all, and contradicting himself in the same post.

In post 515, Fenix wrote:
Neutral scum. He hasn't done anything all game, and then he blames the rest of us for lack of content when
all three of us have each provided more content than him.
While lurking and not contributing isn't an explicit scumtell, long term it can be. He also hasn't strongly pushed for any lynch except mine.
RBT's provided less content
and has more scum-based interactions with Nanook. I believe RBT is much more likely to be scum.