NY 142: Rolling in the Deep, WAIT WAT? PARTY OVER?!

[Slandaar]

both points are saying : your town read on funky makes no sense

town read makes no sense -> you KNOW he is town and are assuming others would think so.

where is the contradiction pine?? do the points contradict? no, they do not.

oh ya its cos you are scum and just fabricating stuff.

[Slandaar]

@Hiraki: what do you think of rev, your read and opinion of case(s) on him?

[Pine]

First, it's spelled "lying". Major pet peeve.

Second, you said one thing about SV, then turned around and said something completely different without qualifying your apparent change in opinion with any sort of explanation. That is textbook cognitive dissonance, and is representative of the pretending-to-scumhunt mentality of scum.

Please point out where I have lied. Characterizing it as such does not make it so.

[Slandaar]

OK, look, if i say 'someone hasnt done anything scummy'

then say not a bad lynch there is no contradiction

a bad lynch would be someone i find town, i do not and did not find SV town, so hes not a bad lynch, comprende?

So, contradiction? hm no. I did not say 'lets lynch SV' he was basically a PL, which I didnt mind too much, so, why are you trying to say i contradicted myself?

Pine is showing major cognitive dissonance here

he said the first part of the post was where i contradicted myself (the part ThAd calls cognitive dissonance)

Now hes saying its the later minor point of the post.

[Beck]

If they haven't done anything scummy, than saying you are fine with them lynched is a contradiction because you shouldn't be wanting to lynch somebody not doing anything scummy.

You said he was delusional, what was SV delusional about anyway?

[Beck]

Here is the difference. I actually think SV has done scummy things, I also think he could be town, I still want him lynched cause I'm not 100% on my read of him and it's partly policy lynch.

That's not a contradiction cause I admit he has been scummy, to want someone lynched for not doing anything scummy is bad bad bad.

[Pine]

OK, look, if i say 'someone hasnt done anything scummy'

then say not a bad lynch there is no contradiction

a bad lynch would be someone i find town, i do not and did not find SV town, so hes not a bad lynch, comprende?

So, contradiction? hm no. I did not say 'lets lynch SV' he was basically a PL, which I didnt mind too much, so, why are you trying to say i contradicted myself?

Pine is showing major cognitive dissonance here

he said the first part of the post was where i contradicted myself (the part ThAd calls cognitive dissonance)

Now hes saying its the later minor point of the post.

I will not be responding to this further, for two reasons. First, the inherent stupidity of your whining about the valid cognitive dissonance case against you and your irritating attempts to call everyone who speaks against you a liar. Second, arguing with scum is always an exercise in futility that I am choosing not to take part in any more.

[Slandaar]

Well, if you are telling the truth why dont you just show where there is a contradiction?

oh wait, you can't/couldn't could you?

funny that.

Now, show the contradiction.

[Pine]

I did. That is my last word on this for now, I will let the strength of my arguments thus far do the talking for me, and the other 20 players decide whether I have sufficiently explained myself.

[Slandaar]

If they haven't done anything scummy, than saying you are fine with them lynched is a contradiction because you shouldn't be wanting to lynch somebody not doing anything scummy.

Show me where I said I wanted to lynch him.

If you are going to tunnel me this hard at least have some truth behind your points, its absolutely ridiculous.

[Slandaar]

I did. That is my last word on this for now, I will let the strength of my arguments thus far do the talking for me, and the other 20 players decide whether I have sufficiently explained myself.

You didn't, when I proved it wasn't a contradiction you threw a hissy fit.

1st post: SV is null

2nd post: SV isnt bad lynch

null = isnt bad lynch

fair enough? why are you still pressing there is a contradiction?

[Beck]

Post 926 is where you say SV isn't a bad lynch.

[Beck]

No it's more like

1. SV hasn't done anything scummy
2. SV isn't a bad lynch

Lynching somebody who hasn't done anything scummy is BAD

[Beck]

And actually why I disagree with your push on TheAd. TheAd hasn't done anything scummy yet you want him lynched.

[Slandaar]

its such a minor ridiculous point, i mean its funny how that huge case has come down to this.

Look, 'not a bad lynch' means ok.

why is it ok?

because he hasnt posted any content and is being useless ie a PL

Never did I try to get SV lynched or say I wanted him lynched.

The contradiction is only coming from your misunderstanding of my meaning. There is no contradiction.

[Slandaar]

TheAd hasn't done anything scummy yet you want him lynched.

This is your opinion, not mine.

[ScreamingHawk]

Slandaar has been pretty helpful so far and the case on him at the moment is pretty weak. Just saying

[Beck]

Never did I try to get SV lynched or say I wanted him lynched

ORLY?

Im thinking we should lynch SV even though ThAd is scummiest player by a long shot.

[Slandaar]

that was a joke post, you are seriously grasping at straws.

[Slandaar]

why didnt you show the whole post, yeah because you know it was a joke.

So what is this? why are you so hellbent on my lynch?

[Slandaar]

the fact you think funkys claim was a joke but you cant distinguish my joke post from serious, i do wonder, you might actually be scum (honest this time)

[Beck]

Here is the whole post, this doesnt look like you are joking you seem to think he will flip scum based on the bolded part

Im thinking we should lynch SV even though ThAd is scummiest player by a long shot.

if he flips scum which there is a fairly decent chance too then

alls good we can celebrate etc.

however, if he flips town, we have some super solid scum reads right? we are guaranted 3/4 scum from his reads which we can now trust... so this seems to benefit us also... I see no reason not to lynch him in fact

unless, his reads are not as good as he claims...

what do you think SV?

So now what do you have for me, mr. Caught scum?

[Beck]

the fact you think funkys claim was a joke but you cant distinguish my joke post from serious, i do wonder, you might actually be scum (honest this time)

A person claiming day 1 like that, is almost always a joke.

Your post obviously wasn't a joke. If it was maybe add a smiley next time

[Slandaar]

I think the last two lines are the ones that indicate the fact its a joke.

if you think I think his reads are as good as he was claiming, why wouldn't I have pushed that issue?

[Slandaar]

nm I know the answer you will give...

still, the post was a joke and it seemed pretty obvious I thought.