Mini 1260 - Last Will Mafia III (Over)

Shattered Viewpoint · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:52 am

You guys just keep posting and posting, yet you're not really

saying

anything.

Can we just lynch SC already?

LlamaFluff · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:57 am

Vote Count

StrangerCoug (3) - Shattered Viewpoint, Amrun, Darox
Darox (1) - StrangerCoug
Amrun (1) - CooLDoG

Not Voting (4) - Rhinox, Fishythefish

With 9 votes out it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline is November 4th, 6PM PDT

Fishythefish · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:17 am

@Rhinox: thanks. Right now, I'm seeing a middlingly plausible explanation if you are town or scum without CD, and a totally plausible explanation as scum with CD. This raises the odds of a you+CD scumteam significantly for me.

But on the flip side, other than this I think you're both town. I'm pretty sure I still prefer a
VOTE: Darox
to anything else (also, there's a niggling part of my value system which prefers fun to winning, and it would hate losing to Lurker-Darox-Scum far more than to Active-Rhinox-CD-Scumteam).

I'm happy for a claim from Darox, if Rhinox is still up for the lynch.

Rhinox · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:36 am

In post 300, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:You guys just keep posting and posting, yet you're not really
saying
anything.

Can we just lynch SC already?

Well, who would make sense as SC's scum partner?

In post 302, Fishythefish wrote:I'm happy for a claim from Darox, if Rhinox is still up for the lynch.

Yeah, I'm still leaning Darox, still happy to hear a claim.

Darox · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:19 am

Back off man, I'm a scientist.

Also I have this condition where I call cops scientists.

Fishythefish · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:28 am

Yeah, right.

Who did you investigate last night? Why on earth did I need to ask that question?

Darox · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:36 am

SV.

On a completely unrelated note, he has been my new beneficiary since dawn.

Fishythefish · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:52 am

Why didn't you claim that originally?

Darox · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:56 am

While I was making the ghostbusters reference or when I got asked to claim the first time?

If the first, because that ruins the flow and someone was going to give me a nice conversational cue to add it anyway, and if the second, because fuck that noise.

Fishythefish · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:16 pm

Seems a strange thing not to claim. I mean, if you're the cop then revealing your result is a really good thing, and I'd be itching to do it.

Why did you investigate SV?

Amrun · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:16 pm

I don't believe the claim.

VOTE: Darox

Who did you investigate night zero?

Lack of this information basically confirms that scum forgot it happened when fakeclaiming. HANG HIM.

Darox · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:21 pm

Who did you protect night 0 Amrun?

SV because he was an unknown that Amrun was blathering about and more interesting than anyone else. I should have done Rhinox but he only had 2 votes so I figured it wasn't a big deal. Didn't do SC because I assumed he'd be lynched regardless and wanted something more usable for the future.

Amrun · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:23 pm

What?

Who did you investigate night 0, Darox?

Darox · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:27 pm

Myself.

I returned innocent, but I think I might be a godfather.

Fishythefish · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:35 pm

Hmmmm. I don't see any particular reason to believe or disbelieve this claim.

UNVOTE:

I'll think through the various permutations tomorrow. (I know I keep doing this "content tomorrow" thing - it's because I often post late at night when tired and/or tipsy)

StrangerCoug · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:45 pm

If Darox is telling the truth, we know what theory of mine has been blown out of the water. It leaves me without a good read, though Amrun and CooLDoG would be the first two people I'd look at again—I still don't know why Amrun was defending Shattered Viewpoint so much and CooLDoG's spat with me over my Fishythefish read seems off.

Amrun · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:25 pm

In post 313, Darox wrote:Myself.

I returned innocent, but I think I might be a godfather.

That's the most ridiculous bullshit I've ever heard.

You seriously unvoted after that, fishy?

Darox · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:33 pm

I don't think the idea that I am an uninformed godfather-cop is ridiculous.
After all, uninformed millers exist, as do miller cops. Just combine the two and invert it.

Amrun · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:35 pm

You cheeky scum fuck.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:43 pm

...Yeah. That's why I didn't unvote.

Darox · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:51 pm

Because making fun of people while still keeping clear communication is scummy.

CooLDoG · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:59 pm

This is not a placeholder post...

I really need to do some thinking over the darox claim. Half and half on it. Also wierd comment to amrun about protection. And why hasn't he been more active... ahh too much, overloaded. More later... Ether tonight or tomorrow.

Amrun · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:14 pm

It's obvious you're being facetious, Darox. You being facetious about a basic question doesn't mean you are successfully making fun of me.

Your claim was failed and you are scum.

Darox · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:23 pm

Ok.

When are you going to claim in a blaze of righteous fury and get us both killed? I'm sure scum will enjoy the show.

Amrun · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:26 pm

You couldn't be more anti-town if you actively tried ... if this isn't you actively trying.