Nomic! GAME ON! (Last Update - Page 10)

[Drench]

AYE on C31
NAY on C32

Not A Fan of recurring items, although I'll note the Jubilee hurts the purchaser so that's

kinda

alright

[JDGA]

Vote NAY on Proposition C33

I like fractions better.

[Drench]

also, two things

a) it would appear that the parliament legislation's going to pass. rest assured, mods, i have software that can handle the meek method (and tbh me wanting to use it seriously was one of my primary motivations) so uh yeah once voting's closed i can do that
b)

Change my name in the OP to:

The Right Honourable Greater Lord Sir Doctor Drench M.D. D.F.A. O.B.E., Second Prince Consort of Greater Walesia, Count Beckinsgatte, Duke of Cornelia (Third Class) XII, Snr. Esquire

[Packbat]

JDGA, it's a separate proposal. Drench, remember to vote nay on the earlier one.

Vote yay Proposition C33

[Drench]

thank ye packbat

Unvote C21
Vote NAY on C21

Proposition C34:

Changing a vote from YAY to NAY or vice versa does not require an unvote in between.

[JDGA]

I know. Still, I like fractions better than rounding. Especially when you get into arguments about what to do with a .5

Vote YAY Proposition C34

[Packbat]

Vote yay Proposition C34

[animorpherv1]

b)

Change my name in the OP to:

The Right Honourable Greater Lord Sir Doctor Drench M.D. D.F.A. O.B.E., Second Prince Consort of Greater Walesia, Count Beckinsgatte, Duke of Cornelia (Third Class) XII, Snr. Esquire

Done

[Drench]

i love this game

edit: image variant of this post for people on the go

[JDGA]

Proposition C35:

Coins may be exchanged for points (but not vice versa) at a 1:1 exchange rate.

Proposition B2:

Rule B1 will be edited as such:
Before -

B1) To propose a rule, at nay time, a player must post the rule in the following format:

Proposition [letter][#]: Rule

Where [letter] is the letter it will go under, and # is the number of propositions that have been made by that number. The first A proposition is A1, the second, A2, etc. If the required % of votes (see A10 and B6) agree with the proposition, then it immediately becomes a new rule under the letter proposed, and under the first available integer number unless specified otherwise.

After -

B1) To propose a rule-change, at any time, a player must post the rule in the following format:

Proposition [letter][#]: Rule

Where [letter] is the letter it will go under, and # is the number of propositions that have been made by that number. The first A proposition is A1, the second, A2, etc. If the required % of votes (see A10 and B6) agree with the proposition, then it immediately becomes a new rule under the letter proposed, and under the first available integer number unless specified otherwise.

Proposition B3: Repeal Rule B3

The rule is entirely redundant, thanks to rule A16.

Proposition B4: Repeal Rule B5

Namely so that Rule C10 can take over and allow the game to still move at a reasonable pace even if someone flakes.

Vote to make Rule A12 mutable

'cause it has to go sooner or later.

(expired on 2011-11-11 22:32:00)

[Drench]

NAY to C35, B2
YAY to B3
NAY to B4

(I would probably vote yay on this if it was linked to a proposition shifting C10 to B-status at the same time)

YAY to A12

at the speed of light

[Packbat]

Vote yay Proposition C35

Vote nay Proposition B2

Vote yay Proposition B3

(remove all redundancy!)

Vote yay Proposition B4

Problem: how do you vote

against

a mutability proposal?

[Xalxe]

I would vote, but I'll wait for the next update so I know what I haven't voted on.

[CSL]

The B proposition to make B4 immutable is now named B1. Thus, B1 is now B2, B2 is named B3, B3 is now B4, and the newer B4 is now B5 to prevent confusion. When proposing in the B's, please start with the first number, and slowly work forward from there. That leads me to:

Proposition B6 (New Rule):

To upgrade a C rule to a B rule, the rule must require at least 65% in favor of it within a reasonable time limit not exceeding seventy-two (72) hours. To upgrade a B rule to an A rule, it must require 100% in favor within a reasonable time limit not exceeding ninety-six (96) hours.

Proposition B7:

If Proposition B6 passes, it shall be in two parts. Part a is the explanation of the rule, and part b is the fact that it cannot be mutable.

Give me a minute to look over the propositions, and vote accordingly. And then I'm gonna update. I'm going to try something different, though, as tables are a nuisance.

You're welcome, Drench!

[JDGA]

If I should explain myself about Proposition B2, part of it is fixing a typo, the other part is making it clear that it applies to edits and repeals as well. I originally thought that we had to make new rules to edit and repeal, so I thought I'd make sure it was obvious.
To vote against a mutability proposal, you simply don't vote at all.

[animorpherv1]

Problem: how do you vote

against

a mutability proposal?

Same way as you'd vote against a rule.

[theamatuer]

]b]Vote yay Proposition C35[/b]

Vote nay Proposition B2

Vote yay Proposition B3

Vote yay Proposition B4

[CSL]

Updates coming tomorrow night. Sleep > Games.

[Nobody Special]

/in

[animorpherv1]

Everybody gets to vote on Nobody Special entering the game.

With 9 voting, it takes 5 to let NS enter.

[theamatuer]

Yes to ns entering

[Xalxe]

Yes to ns entering

[CSL]

Yes to ns entering

[Packbat]

Yay to Nobody Special becoming a player

[Packbat]

Problem: how do you vote

against

a mutability proposal?

Same way as you'd vote against a rule.

There's no establishment to do so in the rules that I can find. I'll just wait for the abstention rule to pass and abstain.