Animal Rescue: petsPick (Game Over!)
-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
-
-
Vi Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Professor Paragon
- Posts: 11768
- Joined: June 29, 2008
- Location: GMT-5
-
-
Quilford Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8438
- Joined: March 11, 2011
-
-
zoraster He/HimDisorganized CrimeHe/Him
- Disorganized Crime
- Disorganized Crime
- Posts: 21680
- Joined: June 10, 2008
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Belmont, CA
-
-
Cogito Ergo Sum YARR!
- YARR!
- YARR!
- Posts: 11085
- Joined: October 29, 2005
- Location: Nottingham
In post 77, Quilford wrote:I did but I don't understand what Angry Birds has to do with this and now my brain hurts ow ow ow
It was a dumb joke anyway.Scumchat is awesome. Yarr!
~"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind."~-
-
xvart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: September 11, 2009
- Location: Missouri
You couldn't post this before your exam when you were posting these two posts:
It had less words than both of the posts combined, plus Jason had not said anything game related at all at the time of Sotty's vote and your scum read on Jason.In post 27, Quilford wrote:well it's just that I'm about to sit an exam so
UNVOTE:
VOTE: QuilfordI only read quote walls.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"-
-
Kublai Khan Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Posts: 5278
- Joined: August 5, 2008
- Location: Sarasota, FL
-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I think VP over reacted to Quilford's town read of me. KK kinda latched on there as well but not as strongly. That wagon was pretty bad.
Jason's xvart vote was terrible but his posting after that feels more townish to me, so we'll see where that goes.
Vi's pressure on Lew is good, Xvart's deflection back to Quilford is not.
Vote: Xvart
Not quite ready to place Lew at L-1 at this point.-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
You're really that gullible, Sotty? since when? Xvart explains it exactly as it is. I don't care about Quilford having a town read on you. The problem is that there was absolutely nothing there to declare a town read based upon. It is a scummy tactic because it's not a legitimate read (he claims they are not random after all!). It's one thing to call someone scummy early game over something minor as a way to get the ball rolling, and it's something entirely different to buddy someone by calling them town over nothing...which apparently worked on you.
While I can understand the premise of the lewarcher wagon, that certainly shot up fast. I at least suggest we don't throw anyone to L-1 quickly while Roxi is waiting in the wings. If scum control that animal, we need to watch out for quick hammers.YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
In post 82, Sotty7 wrote: was pretty bad.
Jason's xvart vote was terrible but his posting after that feels more townish to me, so we'll see where that goes.
How so? it was a random vote in RVS. whats horrible about it, Sotty?-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
In post 83, VP Baltar wrote:You're really that gullible, Sotty? since when?
lol You can stop this right now.
Well when I read what he said about my vote I thought it was pretty weak and silly really. If anything I think it was his way of agreeing with my gut vibes on Jason's first post. What I don't see is how quickly you build the bridge from silly to scummy. Quliford wasn't trying to say I'm confirmed town or anything, and it's not like it's a read that's locked in. From what I have seen of Quliford he does this kinda thing, it's a null tell. But you were all over it like it was a massive thing. I don't see it. I think you blew it up.
Jason, I feel you over justified a throw away random vote, just twinged my gut which is why I voted you. I like to figure you out ASAP so I know if we can team up to destroy the world or not.-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
In post 85, Sotty7 wrote:l tell. But you were all over it like it was a massive thing. I don't see it. I think you blew it up.
Jason, I feel you over justified a throw away random vote, just twinged my gut which is why I voted you. I like to figure you out ASAP so I know if we can team up to destroy the world or not.
HAHA OK then. I know you always like to try and figure me out early. I usually put some comment in the random vote as to why, sometimes whitty, sometimes looking deadly serious.
Quilford - I also defend you as town, more so actually. 70s show was an exception to that. As scum I usually push for your lynch heavily I believe..-
-
Ghostlin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4768
- Joined: March 21, 2008
In post 72, lewarcher82 wrote:In post 51, Vi wrote:Vote: lewarcher82(L-8)
lewarcher 44 wrote:Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.
It sounds like you already had your mind made up.lewarcher 50 wrote:I will agree on the town VI hypothesis for now. Another detail in her posts shows that she tends to be clueless about the fishy potential of her proposal.
Moreover, I have never seen scum fish so blatantly.
I sure did. Feel free to meta me and see what I think of fishing as a scumtell. It is anti-town, but only moronic scum does it. But this does not prevent me from discussing the point with the player in the first place.
Moving to a more interesting post:
In post 61, Ghostlin wrote:In post 44, lewarcher82 wrote:In post 35, glowball wrote:Also, this is petsPick!
Tell me about your actual pets, no details of course. Just sharing, I'll go first. I have a puppy she's about 1.5 years and I LOVE HER she is fluffy and adorable!
This is a terrible idea. This equates you claiming a fluffy and adorable puppy. How is it possible that you do not realise this? And besides, this is fishing. Say that someone tells you that his dog is a German Shepherd who can find anything when he follows his nose. You will just assume that this person is likely a cop. Now I am forced to wonder which one is the explanation of your behaviour. (1) Reckless town - who just won the "VI of the game" trophy despite quil's efforts or (2) fishy scum.
Yes, but in a petsPick, I'm pretty sure a good majority of us have two of the most common pets out there which are dogs and cats for our animals. Everyone thinks their pet is adorable, I'm sure no one submitted a pet they just hated in a 'pet you love' mafia game. And I'm not sure 'young and spry' relates to a specific mafia role, do you?
The thing that worries me is not that glowball naively chose to reveal her animal's flavor so to speak, but the fact that this is a huge overreach over information that really equates to nothing specific about the role.
Vote: lewatcherL-7
Explain, please. Are you voting me for thinking glow was fishing or for saying she wasn't after asking her if she was? Are you voting me for the reason Vi is voting me or for the opposite one?
I'm saying you're stretching in unbelievable ways, taking what should be a 'getting to know you' flavor claim and trying to turn it into a scum tell. That only dumb scum do."You live for the fight when it's all that you've got."--Bon Jovi, Living on a Prayer-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
In post 85, Sotty7 wrote:From what I have seen of Quliford he does this kinda thing, it's a null tell. But you were all over it like it was a massive thing. I don't see it. I think you blew it up.
I blew it up like a massive thing because I questioned him on it and voted him when he didn't answer? Also, I've never played with Quilford that I recall (though I admittedly have a bad memory for that kind of thing), so I'm just gonna calls em like I sees em. Didn't look null to me. Looked like buddying. Only scum are gonna have town reads at that point in the game because they know who the town is.YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!-
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Buddying how? Quilscum/metown?
In post 88, VP Baltar wrote:Only scum are gonna have town reads at that point in the game because they know who the town is.
This isn't strictly true. The reads just won't be very strong.-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
Yeah, if buddying was taking place there it was quilscum/Sottytown.
My point is that it's impossible to get a town read out of "vote:jason". I don't really care if Quilford is quick to make reads and that's his meta. I don't honestly believe anyone could get a town read out of something like that. I'm not criticizing him having scummy or town vibes from posts where there is actually something to interpret, but no one could get town vibes from a contentless RVS vote. Conversely, scum can easily get a town read from that because they know if you're town or not.YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!-
-
glowball Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3740
- Joined: December 3, 2010
- Location: That Space Between Heaven & Hell
In post 83, VP Baltar wrote:You're really that gullible, Sotty? since when? Xvart explains it exactly as it is. I don't care about Quilford having a town read on you. The problem is that there was absolutely nothing there to declare a town read based upon. It is a scummy tactic because it's not a legitimate read (he claims they are not random after all!). It's one thing to call someone scummy early game over something minor as a way to get the ball rolling, and it's something entirely different to buddy someone by calling them town over nothing...which apparently worked on you.
While I can understand the premise of the lewarcher wagon, that certainly shot up fast. I at least suggest we don't throw anyone to L-1 quickly while Roxi is waiting in the wings. If scum control that animal, we need to watch out for quick hammers.
You really think scum would quick hammer this early and reveal their extra vote. They'd surely be gone the next day.-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
Well, I'm operating under the premise that whoever has Roxie can vote in secret since no one has fessed up to having that pet. If it's a public vote, then clearly what I said is moot. If no one comes forward to claim Roxie, then I think it's worth being cautious around.YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!-
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
In post 79, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:In post 77, Quilford wrote:I did but I don't understand what Angry Birds has to do with this and now my brain hurts ow ow ow
It was a dumb joke anyway.
CONTENT!
In post 83, VP Baltar wrote:You're really that gullible, Sotty? since when? Xvart explains it exactly as it is. I don't care about Quilford having a town read on you. The problem is that there was absolutely nothing there to declare a town read based upon. It is a scummy tactic because it's not a legitimate read (he claims they are not random after all!). It's one thing to call someone scummy early game over something minor as a way to get the ball rolling, and it's something entirely different to buddy someone by calling them town over nothing...which apparently worked on you.
While I can understand the premise of the lewarcher wagon, that certainly shot up fast. I at least suggest we don't throw anyone to L-1 quickly while Roxi is waiting in the wings. If scum control that animal, we need to watch out for quick hammers.
Oh man... VPB tries to goad Sotty into this with a sort of insulting challenge, then just goes on to say 'xvart was right' and regurgitate information.
In post 86, jasonT1981 wrote:In post 85, Sotty7 wrote:l tell. But you were all over it like it was a massive thing. I don't see it. I think you blew it up.
Jason, I feel you over justified a throw away random vote, just twinged my gut which is why I voted you. I like to figure you out ASAP so I know if we can team up to destroy the world or not.
HAHA OK then. I know you always like to try and figure me out early. I usually put some comment in the random vote as to why, sometimes whitty, sometimes looking deadly serious.
Quilford - I also defend you as town, more so actually. 70s show was an exception to that. As scum I usually push for your lynch heavily I believe..
I'm going to start policy voting every motherfucker who tries to use selfmeta.
I'm not sure what to make of jason here. He's probably middle of the pack as far as reads go. Vi is screaming town to me, now.green shirt thursdays-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
In post 93, xRECKONERx wrote:Oh man... VPB tries to goad Sotty into this with a sort of insulting challenge, then just goes on to say 'xvart was right' and regurgitate information.
So you're suggesting I was implying something other than what xvart said when I went after Quilford well before him? Do tell.YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!-
-
VP Baltar he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 18539
- Joined: November 3, 2008
- Pronoun: he/him
-
-
Ghostlin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4768
- Joined: March 21, 2008
In post 92, VP Baltar wrote:Well, I'm operating under the premise that whoever has Roxie can vote in secret since no one has fessed up to having that pet. If it's a public vote, then clearly what I said is moot. If no one comes forward to claim Roxie, then I think it's worth being cautious around.
I feel funny about this post. It reads like passive aggressive rolefishing to me. I'm not ok with someone going 'I have Roxie and my pet can vote', particularly since if Roxie is in the votecount, we should be able to see where Roxie's vote is."You live for the fight when it's all that you've got."--Bon Jovi, Living on a Prayer-
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
In post 94, VP Baltar wrote:So you're suggesting I was implying something other than what xvart said when I went after Quilford well before him? Do tell.
I'm saying you went after him first, and xvart gave you a reason for doing so afterthefact.green shirt thursdays-
-
Kublai Khan Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Posts: 5278
- Joined: August 5, 2008
- Location: Sarasota, FL
In post 93, xRECKONERx wrote:I'm going to start policy voting every motherfucker who tries to use selfmeta.
If I were drinking something, that'd be a spit-take right about now.Occasionally intellectually honest
Black Lives Matter
Get vaccinated-
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.