Animal Rescue: petsPick (Game Over!)

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:19 am

UNVOTE, VOTE: LLAMA

Amrun · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:21 am

CES is following my votes etc. and it's weirding me out.

Not in a scummy way. Just kind of funny. Last time we played together he lynched me. x.x I forget if he was town or scum though.

HOWEVER now I am lonely on Jason and still opposing a lewarcher lynch for today, so voting bloc for great glory:

VOTE: llama

Sotty7 · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:23 am

Excellent.

Amrun · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:24 am

Now I'm having flashbacks to the last time I tried to get llamarble lynched. *cries*

I promise not to change my vote to you this time, Sotty.

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:05 am

In post 171, lewarcher82 wrote:But DDD cannot be as blind as he appears to be (I didn't change my claim, don't lie. I explained it and made it a full claim after I was put at L-1).

Right, it's my fault that you intentionally misled us. I also find the "wagon based on nothing" charge to be hilarious; it was based on something in the beginning and your claim shenaigans, Sotty's 181 and the attempts to discredit the wagon only build on that.

In post 199, Amrun wrote:Listen, we don't kill vig claims... That's dumb.

Saying we don't lynch any sort of claim in a role "madness" game. Now that's dumb.

Amrun · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:16 am

I have advocated for the lynching of vigs etc before, in different circumstances.

In this case, I think it's dumb. We haven't had any flips yet. People think he's an SK and want to lynch him for it

when we don't even know if there is an SK

.

He should get at least one night for evaluation. It's just ... common sense, to me.

Amrun · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:18 am

To be totally clear, I kind of dig the case on him (especially as Vi amusingly laid out), but I still do not support the lynch.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:19 am

Amrun gets it.

VP Baltar · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:44 am

xvart is so town.

Quilford still has done nothing. Maybe people will see that soon.

that being said, lewarcher definitely has to go due to something he said not jibbing with what I know.

unvote, vote: lewarcher

KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN...where you at?

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:50 am

In post 230, Amrun wrote:In this case, I think it's dumb. We haven't had any flips yet. People think he's an SK and want to lynch him for it
when we don't even know if there is an SK
.

He should get at least one night for evaluation. It's just ... common sense, to me.

I agree that random SK speculation is dumb. And I understand the logic, give him a night to prove himself maybe he will if he's town. And while that's extremely unlikely in my view because even if he can prove his role it won't prove his alignment and we're more likely to end up at square one no matter what. Let me turn around that logic on you, we let him live another night and he's scum; not just scum but a scum role cop or roleblocker or busdriver and by letting him live one night he shouldn't he alive he manages to fuck up someone's useful night actions or give scum information they need to win. Suddenly the game shifts from one we should win by just rolling scum with night actions to one where scum have some sort of advantage that we can't overcome.

You lynch scum when you get a chance; you don't give them multiple chances to hurt the town.

Amrun · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:00 am

If the case on him were THAT GOOD, I would understand this logic, and have even been there advocating that at some time in my life.

I just don't think lewarcher's relative scumminess dictates that level of risk in possibly killing off a town vig. It's not the right move for today.

lewarcher82 · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:09 am

and hammer it was. Whatev, guys. Ending the first day so quickly is stupid. Go town.

VP Baltar · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:11 am

that was L-1 I believe

zoraster · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:16 am

Day 1

Amrun ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Cogito Ergo Sum ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Debonair Danny DiPietro ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Ghostlin ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

glowball ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

JasonT1981 ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Kublai Khan ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

*** lewarcher82 ( 8 ) ***

Vi,

XReckonerX,

Untrod Tripod,

Ghostlin,

Debonair Danny DiPietro,

Quilford,

Kublai Khan,

VP Baltar,

[/color]

(L - 1 )

Llamarble ( 3 )

Sotty7,

Cogito Ergo Sum,

Amrun,

[/color]

(L - 6 )

Quilford ( 2 )

glowball,

xvart,

[/color]

(L - 7 )

Sotty7 ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Untrod Tripod ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

Vi ( 1 )

lewarcher82,

[/color]

(L - 8 )

VP Baltar ( 0 )

[/color]

(L - 9 )

XReckonerX ( 1 )

Llamarble,

[/color]

(L - 8 )

xvart ( 1 )

JasonT1981,

[/color]

(L - 8 )

No Lynch ( 0 )

Not Voting ( 1 )

Roxi,

Total Votes ( 17 )

Needed to Lynch [ 9 ]

Deadline: Nov. 18th at 20:00 EST

VP Baltar · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:40 am

In post 238, zoraster wrote:XReckonerX ( 1 ) Llamarble, (L - 8 )
xvart ( 1 ) JasonT1981

what is this?

Sotty7 · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:42 am

Llama's vote has been almost as useless as he has this whole game.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:45 am

In post 235, Amrun wrote:If the case on him were THAT GOOD, I would understand this logic, and have even been there advocating that at some time in my life.

I just don't think lewarcher's relative scumminess dictates that level of risk in possibly killing off a town vig. It's not the right move for today.

your mistake is in assuming that lew is a vig. he can only kill cats, and there's no reason to assume that cat = mafia

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:58 am

aka he's a limited vig

This is not a difficult concept.

Amrun · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:00 am

I don't think that all cats are mafia. I have not made the mistake that you think I am making. Do you have any reason to think that mafia CAN'T be cats?

I assumed that the species of pet would be completely irrelevant to alignment and I'll continue thinking this until proven otherwise.

Lew may or not be a vig. I think it's worth giving him a night to see what happens.

p-edit: And also that.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:07 am

you think giving him a night to sacrifice himself to prove...uh...that his alignment was town...is good?

Amrun · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:14 am

Yes.

Disregarding your leading question and distortion.

Kublai Khan · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:17 am

I'm here VP. We're entertaining out. Of town relations right now and I hate phone posting with all its useless and wrong autocorrefcting.

The "let's save lew" contingent is retarded. If the bestdefense they have for him is "he might only be an SK or maybe he's a vig that can't kill mafia" then he's a very worthwhile lynch and I don't know why were fucking around.

Less night kills = more days to scumhunt.

Vi · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:33 am

Unvote: lewarcher82

This is not a retraction or a reversal, but I'm just too anti-fun to let the game go to Night before I've had a chance to look things over again.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:36 am

In post 245, Amrun wrote:Yes.

Disregarding your leading question and distortion.

what about my question was leading or distorting?

glowball · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:13 am

In post 236, lewarcher82 wrote:and hammer it was. Whatev, guys. Ending the first day so quickly is stupid. Go town.

I don't buy this at all.

VOTE: Lewarcher

and NO that wasn't a hammer, Vi unvoted so save the fake hammer response.