Quilford wrote:Whoops, sorry. I meant to say that he apparently kills pets arbitrarily.
Arbitrarily how?
Quilford wrote:Whoops, sorry. I meant to say that he apparently kills pets arbitrarily.
In post 299, Ghostlin wrote:In post 296, Amrun wrote:For the record, I'm not arguing that he is town. I'm arguing that his alignment cannot yet be determined for sure and that he is not the smartest lynch for today.
Why would you leave a third party role like SK alive on Day 1?
In post 302, Ghostlin wrote:Consider for a minute that you absolutely believe Le's claim. Your options are:
1) Limited modified Town Vig.
2) Limited modified SK (only wins when he's the only cat alive).
3) Limited modified Scum Vig (which could happen depending on the protection roles in Town).
In post 299, Ghostlin wrote:In post 296, Amrun wrote:For the record, I'm not arguing that he is town. I'm arguing thathis alignment cannot yet be determinedfor sure and that he is not the smartest lynch for today.
Why would you leave a third party role like SK alive on Day 1?
In post 303, Amrun wrote:In post 302, Ghostlin wrote:Consider for a minute that you absolutely believe Le's claim. Your options are:
1) Limited modified Town Vig.
2) Limited modified SK (only wins when he's the only cat alive).
3) Limited modified Scum Vig (which could happen depending on the protection roles in Town).
...And? lol
In post 279, Kublai Khan wrote:
I'm still not understanding why you want to give him a night of mafia-talking.
1) He posted something suspicious and got called on it.
2) He flustered under questioning and tried to mountanize something minor as a desperate distraction.
3) Made a false claim.
4) OMGUSed his main accuser as scum (and no one else)
5) Changed his claim.
6) Changed flavor of claim to match details that didn't make sense.
7) Avoided answering direct questions about his claim that didn't make sense.
8) Heavily pushing a "just let me live one night" plan when his role clearly isn't helpful enough to warrant that plan even if his claim wasn't crap to begin with.
How are you *that* blind to his scumminess?
In post 304, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 299, Ghostlin wrote:In post 296, Amrun wrote:For the record, I'm not arguing that he is town. I'm arguing thathis alignment cannot yet be determinedfor sure and that he is not the smartest lynch for today.
Why would you leave a third party role like SK alive on Day 1?
your logic:
we cannot prove he's town therefore he MUST be scum
ladies and gentlemen, it's the argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy in the wild! shh! don't disturb it or it will run away and we can't make fun of it.
In post 305, Ghostlin wrote:In post 303, Amrun wrote:In post 302, Ghostlin wrote:Consider for a minute that you absolutely believe Le's claim. Your options are:
1) Limited modified Town Vig.
2) Limited modified SK (only wins when he's the only cat alive).
3) Limited modified Scum Vig (which could happen depending on the protection roles in Town).
...And? lol
2 and 3 are scum roles. There is no middle ground if you believe in his claim there, it's gotta be one of the three.
Also, do you think just dogs or cats exist in this game?
In post 300, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Well, for one, in this case lewSK's best bet'd probably be to try and shoot scum and then claim it as a vig shot.
Quilford wrote:Whoops, sorry. I meant to say that he apparently kills pets arbitrarily.
Arbitrarily how?
Sotty7 wrote:I also hate that the last page or so has been heavy in the set up spec. I feel Lew is totally distracting us all from scum hunting and instead we'll bicker about "optimal strategies".
In post 308, Untrod Tripod wrote:@AmrunNo. It was at Ghostlin. Your argument was that since we can't determine his alignment, it's probably safer to just leave him be until we can get a better idea. Right? I'm not saying I agree with it, but I think that's a townie reaction.
In post 312, Sotty7 wrote:In post 310, Quilford wrote:But now I'm actually uncomfortable lynching him. .______________.
Why?
In post 313, Amrun wrote:As for the pet being alive or dead, that is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT. We were told when submitting pets that you could submit a living or passed pet.
In post 313, Amrun wrote:But he still picks who to target... So it's not arbitrary. It's a LIMITED VIG.
In post 315, Amrun wrote:jesus christ, someone fucking unvote
I respectfully decline.In post 314, Vi wrote:*There are two BIG things going against lewarcher right now. He has given up entirely. I was hoping he would put something into this new leash on life, but the time has passed and he has been unable to fabricate a single read beyond OMGUS, let alone any kind of decent plea.
Quilford wrote:IT'S ARBITRARY WHO HE KILLS. NO MATTER WHO HE PICKS, WHETHER HE THINKS THEY'RE TOWN OR SCUM, HE WILL DIE UNLESS THEY'RE A CAT. HOW THE SHIT IS THIS FAIR ON HIM UNLESS HE HAS SOME WAY TO DISCERN WHO SOMEONE'S PET IS, HMM?
In post 301, Amrun wrote:You can lynch SK day 1, but if you never lynch scum after that, you still lose. It's much better to lynch SCUM. An SK lynch is a very-little-information flip. Town can harness him to do their bidding under threat of death, as well. If he disobeys, he dies.
For example, tonight, we can tell him who to target.
If this is real and I'm not physically around to be the first to say it after the fact, just kind of pretend I'm the first to call you a moron and we'll work with it.