In post 772, Vi wrote:Mod: Please prod Llamarble
He's been prodded, but he did mention he had limited access for the next few days.
In post 772, Vi wrote:Mod: Please prod Llamarble
I wanted time to reread.In post 776, Amrun wrote:Vi, I still don't understand why you unvoted, since Ghostlin is in your scum tier.
Wait, you're not following someone else's vote?CES wrote:Vi, with me!
Vi 772 wrote:Immortal Tier
Amrun
Sotty7
That One Tier
Untrod Tripod
Kublai Khan
Quilford
Cogito Ergo Sum
That Other Tier
VP Baltar
jasonT1984
xvart
Scum Tier
Debonair Danny DiPietro
Ghostlin
glowball
Llamarble
In post 753, Ghostlin wrote:In post 139, Llamarble wrote:The point was to look town.
More specifically to be transparent about my reactions to THE UNIVERSE.
The Llamarble case:
1) General uselessness (Fluff, lack of scumhunting).
Posts that indicate this behavior: 139, 200 (mostly the beginning of 200), 223, 340 (mostly a game mechanic that doesn't talk about scumhunting), 453-455 (he mostly explains how he came to the reads without any real analysis), 457, 484 (with this many posts, no wonder you were third), 490 (is really just waving himself around).
2) Lack of explanation on most of his town/scum reads: I've hit this point a lot, but he often will say X is town or Y is scum without really giving a case or much of a reason. Besides 'my ISO', the only reason why I think Llam's voting for me is because he didn't like the reason I voted for him via case. He did claim it was inaccurate, but Sotty, point #1 is the reason I voted for Llam in the first place. (Particularly since he listed me as a town read end of Day 1).
3) Excessive use of one or more of the following phrases, 'more to come', 'I'll do a deepread', etc. This is forgivable if he coughs up the goods, but yesterday he waited until the 11th hour to post a town/scum list. He never goes into detail why he suspects the way he does; and his case on me was really 'I guess I better have a case on Ghostlin. 'His ISO', and OMGUS.
4) I don't like #654. You can argue about meta until the cows come home, but it reads as an excuse to shift his vote off of VP onto a more poplous wagon.
5) #656 has either an associative tell with no reasoning or calling out three players as scum for no reason.
In post 782, VP Baltar wrote:lol, so if Vi repeats what I've been saying all damn day, it suddenly makes Llama seem scummier. Good to hear my opinion is so valued 'round these parts.
What was so slimy about my posting?
In post 783, Llamarble wrote:Erm why am I getting lynched again?
What was so slimy about my posting?
Careful immortal-tiering Sotty; unless she's Towned recently I was a little worried about her.
Pretty sure none of these things are actually scummy and I can provide a hojillion examples of all of them from me-town.
There's time before deadline; don't lynch me till I at least get available to talk again.
Just curious, butIn post 788, Llamarble wrote:I reread VP / Xvart / Ghostlin. All I can say about them is HOLY BALLS ALL THREE NEED TO DIE.
You really are trying to say that I'm misrepping what when down when I just illustrated exactly how wrong you are? The "push" jason put on Llamarble consisted ofIn post 773, Sotty7 wrote:Yes, I saw what you were driving at but it wasn't until I took a closer look at the whole Jason/Llama/Glow exchange did I realize how badly you were misrepping what went down.
Well compared to your reasons for thinking jason are scum (one post gut read, not posting, etc.) I would say that I have a less shitcase than you do. Speaking of your read on jason, while looking through your ISO to see why you have a varying level of suspicion on jason I would some interesting things. You had a gut scum read on his first post. You then further explain your first vote as a gut scum read. You then ask Amrun to consider lynching Llamarble over jason. Then you call jason wrongtown. Then you ask ghostlin why he is voting Llamarble over Amrun/CES/jason. Then you come back and confirm you are suspicious of jason. That is certainly a lot of dancing around voting jason if I've ever seen it.In post 773, Sotty7 wrote:It doesn't matter that I have varying scum reads on all three of those players, a shit case is a shit case and makes me really want to lynch you.
Less posturing please.In post 792, Kublai Khan wrote:Wait.. what? I get sick for a couple of days and come back to see my Ghostlin wagon decimated in favor of a Llamarble wagon?
And it looks like Llamarble is conceding without any kind of claim? Well... shit. That's a scum-tell in itself.
I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
I'm more talking about:In post 795, Kublai Khan wrote:I'm not posturing. Since Roxi is assumed to be the hammering vote, I'm prodding him for a roleclaim. This is a role madness game, so there's no reason for him to be giving up like a VT.
Don't say "there are better lynches" without advertising them.KK 794 wrote:I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
...For calling you scum? ...For suggesting that I could go from one wagon you weren't on to other wagons you also aren't on? ...For not being on your scumteam?glowball 796 wrote:Mmkay so should Llam turn out to be town, Vi deserves death.
In post 797, Vi wrote:Don't say "there are better lynches" without advertising them.