In post 849, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt mostly because we have plenty of good suspects.
Unvote, vote: Ghostlin
Fair enough.
VOTE: Ghostlin
In post 849, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt mostly because we have plenty of good suspects.
Unvote, vote: Ghostlin
In post 859, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 850, Llamarble wrote:We're not sure the third party is a killing role or not.
But yeah, VP being blocked on a night where there weren't as many kills as expected increases the odds he's scum.
Did Llamarble just claim Serial Killer?
In post 882, saulres wrote:And boy was that a flashback when Sotty and VPB were going at each other on D1) and I was hoping for a chance to replace in.
In post 882, saulres wrote:Cogito Ergo Sum: Null or bad scum
In post 883, Sotty7 wrote:I hope it wasn't as bad as Magician mafia
In post 134, Ghostlin wrote:if the DV can help us with the game because scum might have to be more careful with their votes
In post 137, Ghostlin wrote:In post 119, Llamarble wrote:Lewarcher wagon looks quite good, actually.
Though that'd mean a lot of scum-on-scum piling. CES / DDDP / UT or something.
I'll deepdive later this evening I think. Keeping Lew out of hammer range for the time being sounds like a good plan.
Was there a point to this post? Reck used the word non-committal to describe Amrun, but I think this trumps that.
In post 139, Llamarble wrote:The point was to look town.
More specifically to be transparent about my reactions to THE UNIVERSE.
In post 850, Llamarble wrote:We're not sure the third party is a killing role or not.
But yeah, VP being blocked on a night where there weren't as many kills as expected increases the odds he's scum.
In post 134, Ghostlin wrote:if the DV can help us with the game because scum might have to be more careful with their votes
In post 882, saulres wrote:@Ghostlin: In 478 and 479 you refer to D1 as "last night". Explain to me how that is not a scumslip.
In post 875, Quilford wrote:In post 849, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt mostly because we have plenty of good suspects.
Unvote, vote: Ghostlin
Fair enough.
VOTE: Ghostlin
In post 519, Quilford wrote:The results are unsurprising but significant considering there was only one kill last night: 4 mafia, 1 third party, 10 town
In post 211, Llamarble wrote:What kind of setup with an SK could make sense? 1 v 4 v 11?
In post 839, Vi wrote:The third vote on one wagon is shameless bandwagoning...?