NY 142: Rolling in the Deep, WAIT WAT? PARTY OVER?!

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #3025 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:07 am

Yeah. So it was a gambit.

But

Pine

has

to be scum.

If he were town, he'd say I'm scum and campaign for my lynch, which would be the right and righteous move.

But noooooooooooooooooo, he keeps calling me town, What The Coconut???

So, yeah.

I'm in.

We lynch him today, and if I'm wrong, off with my head tomorrow.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #3026 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:13 am

[REDACTED]

Beck · Post Post #3027 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:22 am

In post 3025, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah. So it was a gambit.

But
Pine
has
to be scum.

If he were town, he'd say I'm scum and campaign for my lynch, which would be the right and righteous move.

But noooooooooooooooooo, he keeps calling me town, What The Coconut???

So, yeah.

I'm in.

We lynch him today, and if I'm wrong, off with my head tomorrow.

Smh

vote: dripping goofballs

ThAdmiral · Post Post #3028 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:30 am

I'd rather lynch theamateur still.

theamatuer · Post Post #3029 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:33 am

Well first things first.
Pine- he is definitely lying. His vig claim was under little pressure and he claimed that you couldn't get a guilty on him, and he asked chkflip about the 3rd party cop investigation. Serial Killer, or a Godfather type role would be the best bets.
I need to leave for a while. Ill iso everyone else and tell my reads later.

sorgster · Post Post #3030 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:34 am

There may be a modkill thad. This isn't good especially if they're both town.

ZeL1nK · Post Post #3031 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:39 am

Quick phone post: why has ta not pointed out the obvious re:sv?

theamatuer · Post Post #3032 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:52 am

Hadn't the time to change post with the new stuff.
That being said, I believe DGB more than SV, as DGB feels more town. Also, DGB might be a JOAT, in which thered be no cc. I suck at game analysis though.
Although, I suppose the minimum that'll happen is a force-replacement. Though that will be impossible considering circumstances. :/

ThAdmiral · Post Post #3033 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:53 am

One or both could be replaced in the other game. I don't see how it affects this game.
In any case sv didn't name any game. He could be talking about another game dgb is/was in.

ThAdmiral · Post Post #3034 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:54 am

Theamateur: dgb admitted it was a gambit. Fail harder.

smargaret · Post Post #3035 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:57 am

dear god.

When a gambit is successful in outing scum, you vote the scum, not the gambiter. And Theam, are you even reading this game? DGB admitted it was a gambit and there was no such one-shot cop role.

ZeL1nK · Post Post #3036 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:58 am

No I meant you blocked him n1 and seem to have forgotten this...

I have a theory about this that requires the existence of a Jk but it seems you forgot your own night actions

theamatuer · Post Post #3037 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:59 am

Sorry. Just saw zelink talking about re: SV, so I isod SV for his most recent post

Beck · Post Post #3038 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:08 am

@SV, are you sure you got a result n1?

theamatuer · Post Post #3039 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:15 am

Well apparently everything I do is useless

Jailkeeper is possible.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #3040 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:18 am

In post 3039, theamatuer wrote:
Jailkeeper is possible.

I love you, but I wouldn't JK

you

.

Shattered Viewpoint · Post Post #3041 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:30 am

In post 3038, Beck wrote:@SV, are you sure you got a result n1?

Absolutely. I can't quote the PM, but I got it. ....Why do you ask?

unvote

Vote: Pine

Beck · Post Post #3042 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:41 am

In post 3041, Shattered Viewpoint wrote:
In post 3038, Beck wrote:@SV, are you sure you got a result n1?

Absolutely. I can't quote the PM, but I got it. ....Why do you ask?

unvote

Vote: Pine

Cause theam said he RB'd you

Pine · Post Post #3043 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:45 am

What the fuck? Why did you switch your vote to me, SV?

Pine · Post Post #3044 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:48 am

In post 3029, theamatuer wrote:Well first things first.
Pine- he is definitely lying. His vig claim was under little pressure and he claimed that you couldn't get a guilty on him, and he asked chkflip about the 3rd party cop investigation. Serial Killer, or a Godfather type role would be the best bets.
I need to leave for a while. Ill iso everyone else and tell my reads later.

I was trying to disprove once and for all DGB's gambit, you knob. Mods confirming that SKs receive a "Not Guilty" result as I had thought would clear me completely from DGB's fakeclaim. If I were an SK, that's one of the first questions I would have asked, in private, and not risked having a good chunk of my defense publicly blown out of the water.

Can anyone, anyone at all, honestly say that they think theAm is anything other than scum?

chkflip · Post Post #3045 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:51 am

I really, really, really,

REALLY

don't want to mod-kill two more people. I think, given the context and (lack thereof of) severity of the actions involving this particular game... it's warning worthy.

So that makes Pine, Beck, SV, and DGB at one a piece. You don't get another one.

The posts have been redacted... nothing to see here folks.

Continue.

sorgster · Post Post #3046 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:54 am

Who did sv say night 1?

Night 2 he said revenus.

Beck · Post Post #3047 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:57 am

Pine, thoughts on rev now that SV has him inno.

Plus, you can still be scum too pine

P.edit. N1 was zel

Shattered Viewpoint · Post Post #3048 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:57 am

This post is an outright lie. I definitely, absolutely got a result Night One.

sorg: ZeL1nk. Who is innocent.

Shattered Viewpoint · Post Post #3049 (ISO) » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:59 am

I will take under advisement any suggestions for investigation tonight.