Post Restriction Mafia MEGA - It's Over!

[the silent speaker]

Just to clarify, my notion was not to vote Machi Mafi on the grounds of the restriction being implausible; I've seen one in Seuss II that was, if anything, even more ruthless. My notion was to vote him, in the absence of any better ideas, to keep his restriction from spoiling the game.

This may only be a marginally better idea, but

unvote: riktus, vote: themanhimself

based on this post:

I seriously question the defendant Machiavellian's supposed post restriction As well as the other defendants,

Tamuz's incorrect spelling seems a bit too obvious

(not to mention the fact that riktus is doing the same), Twomz never being able to focus on anything seems somewhat suspicious, but believable enough, however, as much as I appreciate his translating skills, thedocsalive's stuttering is simply too obvious to be believable.

Tamuz looks like Elmer Fudd to me, not typos. Also, not only do I disagree on the "serious question[ing]" of Machi Mafi's restriction, he seems to be taking a very convenient attitude toward the damn things. The stuttering is "too obvious to be believable"? But Twomz's restriction is somehow less obvious? Stikey's smurfs and draygn_mage's legalese are somehow subtle? Why does a false pairing of typos make your list, but not our two ducks?

[ChannelDelibird]

I don't believe the other quacker is scum, and I'd like you guys to wait a bit before voting for a quacker, because there is some more quacking information coming your way soon (unfortunately, I don't know who has the information. But you'll know it when you see it).

[riktus]

Tamuz looks like Elmer Fudd to me, not typos.

Secnod taht, I am makinh tipos, wheras Tamz apears to hav a lsip.

there is some more quacking information coming your way soon (unfortunately, I don't know who has the information. But you'll know it when you see it).

Hwo veri criptic.

Nto sur abowt MM psot restrction, bt ceem 2 remembr mdo recomending onlyne translaton thnigs in lst psot restrction mafeea, so posible.

[themanhimself]

Elmer fudd sounds believable. In my earleir post I only targeted thos who comae to mind, but if you would like a second list I would be more than happy to post one! I rest.

[Twomz]

When I recieved my PM of my pirate talking restriction on the first game, GL included a link to an online pirate tran...

Hey! Did you know there's an international pirate day . I didn't! But I do now . I can't seem to remember what day it is though...

Ah hem... an online pirate translator. I'm sure it would be even easier to find a spanish one...

[themanhimself]

Hmmm.. also logical. The prosecution requests a moment to rethink our stand on certain issues.

[Nightfall]

Also, I'd be shocked if both CD and Nixame were ducks. It seems more likely to me that one of them is smurfing having that restriction.

*Nix pictures stikey's face at the end of the game*--->
The assumption that one of us is a fake duck ruffles my feathers. Quack!

This is going to look really bad on me now, but....
I have been away on May 2-4 related business so I wasn't able to post yet, and now that I am back, and feal like I'm fealing the after effects of being on quack! I will

Vote: Viper

.

[viper0933]

^

Uh

oh...

I

disagree

with

that

[Nightfall]

I only voted you because I had to.

I still haven't read a single Quacking thing other than posts from a certain member and the one post that I quoted (which I just happend to catch when scrolling).

I will try and catch up, and post something more real soon.

[riktus]

Thre duks? I sed duks wer supisious Fined it kindd of unlikelee tht teh modd wood giv 3 diferent peeple teh sayme restrction, partikularly nott orl 3 as towne - kwestion is, witch won (or mor) ar mohst likelee to be scumm?

Of corse, we havnt herd fromm Shamrck, ubertimy, vaugn or indenturedjinm, so we stil hav sum mor restrctions 2 lern aboot.

[indentureddjinn]

Wow I'm here, let me read before posting.

[viper0933]

You

just

lied

[Nightfall]

On a quick read over I will

FOS

the silent speaker
Pink Princess
Der Hammer
armlx
indentureddjinn

Because the all seem to have posted without a restriction.

Do scum have restrictions too?

[viper0933]

Yes

they

do

I

would

guess,

but

they

might

be

hidden

or

something

[Yosarian2]

3 ducks actually less suspicious then 2 ducks
Unlikely 3 people fake being quacking nuts
Still possible that one of them is faking
But them telling truth, now more sense is making

[thedocsalive]

Do scum have restrictions too?

Um...uh...I r-read the last g-game, and m-mafia didn't have re-restrictions. They h-had to f-fake them. IIRC, there w-was also a v-vanilla without a re-restriction. You'd be b-better off asking T-Twomz though, um...uh...who p-played in that g-game.

Even if I'm r-right though...uh...um...it m-may not be exactly th-the same f-for this g-game.

[Pink Princess]

I have a restriction - do we tell everyone what our restriction is? How does that part of the game work? My restriction is far less obvious than the Spanish posts, the stuttering or the judge (etc.), but it is here - I thought it would be obvious in the random vote phase. Fortunately, my restriction is not too far out of character for me. I have not figured out what a few of the other restrictions are, and I agree with Nightfall, it seems that some do not have one. I think for now, I will

unvote

my random vote.

[the silent speaker]

...Nightfall, isn't post subject 62 quack-free?

FOS: Nightfall

on suspicion of being a ruthless killer, but one quackless post is not cause for a vote right just now.

[indentureddjinn]

My restriction is not quite as obvious as the quacking or the Spanish. But, alas, it is still rather hindering. Should we all do a mass restriction claim?

[stikey]

I smurfed the same thing about Nightfall's last post, TSS. (I was going to post a smurfy comment like "Didn't you mean 'On a

quack

read over I will FOS...'?")

It's possible that the three ducks smurf a mason group <shrug>

[Twomz]

unvote, vote: Viper

In the first game the scum (and one townie *Glares at D_M*) started the game WITHOUT restriction. That's why.

OH! OH! OH! I just ordered my new Compy! It's going to be so shiny and new!! SEE! LOOK AT IT!!!


Er... why I'm suspicious of people with... "hairy" post restrictions, it's more likely that they just made it up.

[Nightfall]

...Nightfall, isn't post subject 62 quack-free?

FOS: Nightfall

on suspicion of being a ruthless killer, but one quackless post is not cause for a vote right just now.

Oh quakers. Sorry about that. I was in a hurry and thought I put it in.

[ChannelDelibird]

(Having a third quacker was the 'more information' I was talking about.)

Anyway, I think four votes on Viper is a bit extreme. So this little quacker is going to

unvote Viper

and quack on with some serious thinking.

[themanhimself]

unvote
vote:nightfall

The defendants inability to follow his so-called post restriction, seems uber-suspicous, and I ask the members of the jury to please consider him as a candidate for the lynch.
No more questions your honor.

[ChannelDelibird]

I have reason to believe that Nightfall was just going a bit quackers when he forgot to quack - I'm not ready to quack the whip on him just yet. Not sure who to vote for yet, don't want to throw it around...