Post Restriction Mafia MEGA - It's Over!

[GreenLiquid]

Mod: I asked to be replaced almost a week ago.

And I've been looking for a replace for about a week.

[Der Hammer]

Howdy guys, I forgot this game. Have not ventured from the Mini games for a while. I gonna have a re-read and post later and think some of you should do the same

[viper0933]

Mod

: Ok, I was just wondering why I didn't see a response.

[thedocsalive]

Thedocsalive says that he doesn't think my restriction is real (although he said he wouldn't vote for people for that reason... Confused.)

I s-said I um...uh...wouldn't vote people s-solely based on r-restrictions. I only m-mentioned your r-restriction as an additional t-thought. The main r-reason for my v-vote is tss' p-post 167.

I'm uh...c-confused by V-Vaughn's p-posting in this g-game. He's m-made a f-few posts, with a v-vote or v-vote change in every um...one, but has added very l-little discussion. His latest v-vote on a claimed m-mason stands out, IMO.

[Vaughn]

Posting Restriction (Ten) "Yes": Once a Day, Vote no count.

[GreenLiquid]

Oh no! We need more participation!

Vote count coming your way soon...

[GreenLiquid]

Vote Count:

Twomz (8) - thesilentspeaker, Yosarian2, thedocsalive, ChannelDelibird, Glork, armlx, ubertimmy, Nightfall
Stikey (2) - Machiavellian-Mafia, Twomz
Glork (1) - Vaughn
Machiavellian-Mafia (1) - Tamuz

11 to lynch.

[GreenLiquid]

Also, it looks like bertrand will be replacing Viper.

[Rosso Carne]

I would say something rude, but I dont want you guys to kill me.

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

1) I decided to claim at the beginning of Day 1 from now on when i'm a vanilla townie (w/ just a few exceptions). If you find that scummy w/e, but it doesn't stop me from doing it. I can assure you that i'm telling the truth, although you'll just have to take my word for it, and realize that if I don't tell the truth i'll be imediately lynched in all other games that i'm doing it in (therefore, there is no reason for me to lie about it, in fact, there's a good reason for me to tell the truth.)

Esta razón es por qué pienso que el Señor Twomz es una persona buena en vez de la mafia. Probablemente hay muchas personas de la mafia que votaron a Twomz para lincharle, especialmente el Señor Ubertiimy, acechador grande, y el Señor armlx, sin una restricción.

Sé que probablemente ustedes me atacen, pero cuando twomz muere, el moderador dirá que twomz es una persona buena.

[armlx]

My restriction exists MM, its just an activated one, and a pretty sucky one at that. Still, the trigger hasn't occurred yet.

[Tamuz]

Esta razón es por qué pienso que el Señor Twomz es una persona buena en vez de la mafia. Probablemente hay muchas personas de la mafia que votaron a Twomz para lincharle, especialmente el Señor Ubertiimy, acechador grande, y el Señor armlx, sin una restricción.

Sé que probablemente ustedes me atacen, pero cuando twomz muere, el moderador dirá que twomz es una persona buena.

Code: Select all

 This weason for what I think that mistew Twomz is a good pewson in place of mafia. There are p wobably many peopwe fwom the mafia who voted Twomz in owdew to wynch him, especiawwy Mistew Ubewtimmy, wurking gweatly, and Mistew awmwx without a westwiction.

I'm not feewing the Twomzwagon, but I am awso vewwy concewned about how many wurkers we do have.[/code]

[the silent speaker]

Glork:

And Timmy -- for some odd reason -- just claimed that he tracked TSS last night? Yet he joins the Twomzwagon b/c Twomz "looks pretty scummy" to me?

Why does Ubertimmy's claim that he tracked me to nowhere contradict his decision to vote Twomz? The way you phrased this, it sounds like you think he should think worse of me for his (claimed) night action, and I don't get that at all.

Stikey:

FOS: tss for not including himself on the list of people with non-obvious restrictions. That's some serious pot-smurfing-the-kettle-black. Also, I don't smurf the "Twomz is the other Duokiller and Vaughn's his other accomplice" thing. Shouldn't there reasonably only be two Duokillers?

I didn't run down a list and declare everyone without a restriction of ruthless obviousness to be scum. To the contrary -- indjinn's is still a mystery to me, but I'm not horribly suspicious of him. All I did was mention a couple of the outstanding ones who look like they

don't

have nonobvious restrictions. I know perfectly well what

my

restriction is -- it's probably findable by now should anyone care to look -- and you don't truly expect me to find myself suspicious on grounds of "I can't find his restriction," do you?

As for the other thing, I find Vaughn's pattern to be, in and of itself, scummy. Yes, probably there is only one Duo Killer left, judging by the name, but that doesn't change the possibility that a line of Twomz's post looked suspiciously like an opportunity for Vaughn to latch on; or even that Twomz muddied the waters of Vaughn's failure to post with restrictions on purpose, even though they aren't actual allies, to help cover his own tracks. The little that Vaughn has posted has been pretty uniformly scummy. He doesn't

have

to be Twomz and tmh's accomplice to be scum -- and for that matter, I could be wrong about Twomz. I don't think I am, because he has also posted a great deal of scummy and is also linked to known scum, but it

is

possible that Vaughn and not Twomz is a Duo Killer.

Armlx's "triggered post restriction" sounds fake to me. Interesting that Der Hamer's last post doesn't seem to adhere to his restriction, either.

Vaughn, correct me if my impression of your last post is wrong, but the restriction you claim is ten words per post, once per RL day, with votes not counting toward the ten?

[Glork]

Glork:

And Timmy -- for some odd reason -- just claimed that he tracked TSS last night? Yet he joins the Twomzwagon b/c Twomz "looks pretty scummy" to me?

Why does Ubertimmy's claim that he tracked me to nowhere contradict his decision to vote Twomz? The way you phrased this, it sounds like you think he should think worse of me for his (claimed) night action, and I don't get that at all.

Look at Timmy's post again. He says he tracked/stalked you right after you claim that Twomz is a Duo-Killer. He also proceeds to vote for Twomz anyway.

I think his post is very cluttered. By saying he followed you to nowhere, he's doing two things. First, he's implicitly questioning your conejcture that Twomz is the other Duo Killer (because he's implicitly disputing that you would have any role-related info via investigation or tracking). Second, he's dropping a likely claim in his post -- without pressure and without having caught a player in an outright lie. (Because let's face it -- you didn't say you had role-related info against Twomz. You just made a bold assertion.) And as I said, even though he brings up this info against you, he votes for Twomz anyway for "being scummy."

I'm not saying that the two parts of his post are contradictory. What I'm noting is that he's choosing to claim and comment on one player while voting another. Interestingly enough, his claim is an indirect dispute of your certainty that Twomz = Duo Killer, even though his vote is going to Twomz anyway.

[Glork]

...um.... QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK!


Yeah, that was definitely written in the last post, too. >.<

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

El pueblo acabó de linchar el Señor Twomz en otro juego que él pretendió ser una persona buena, ¡Y él fue una persona buena! Ahora soy un cien por ciento seguro que Twomz es honrado en este juego también.

[thedocsalive]

"A t-town just l-lynched Twomz in another g-game where...um...uh...h-he claimed to be a g-good guy, and he was a good g-guy! N-now I am one h-hundred percent s-sure that Twomz is g-good in this game also."--MM

The t-translation is not p-perfect, but I t-think it gets the p-point across. If I made any m-major mistakes, s-say so in your n-next post, MM.

I d-disagree with this p-post, um...however. Uh...I don't think we c-can assume that his c-claim is true just b-because it w-was in another g-game. I think it's p-pretty b-bold to say you're one h-hundred percent s-sure about the t-townie claim.

[Der Hammer]

looking back the main suspect is Vaughan with his 'any wagon will do type post earlier, but Tmoz doesnt look quite right as well. I think we should lynch him

I might as well claim because it looks like I have been lurking for a while but I am the mysterious person leaving those notes on Trees protecting someone from a lynch. Obviously both times I picked Pink Princess (she is royalty after all).

Vote: Twomz

Just because he was good and said he was in another game means nothing

[bertrand]

Yeah

guys,

I'm

here

. Doing

this

is

incredibly

annoying

since

the

buttons

don't

always

work

for

me. So

I'll

keep

my

posts

short

and

simple.

Longer

post

later

I

guess.

Gotta

go.

And

Quacking

is

funny.

[I'mGonnaSeeIfPostingLikeThisAllAsOneWordIsLegal.ItMayBeLessAnnoying.]

[Nightfall]

...um.... QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK!


Yeah, that was definitely written in the last post, too. >.<

Quack!
Ducks fly together
Glad to see I'm not the only one quacked in the head.

[bertrand]

Note:-For-no-reason-I-will-say-quack-occasionally.-It's-just-fun.-:P

[bertrand]

And-there's-no-need-to-underline-every-other-word-when-there's-only-one-word,-right?-:D

Is-this-any-less-annoying-though?

[GreenLiquid]

Looks like we have a serious epidemic of non-posting syndrome. Last warning before a deadline is instated.

[Glork]

Bertrand, I'd rather you quack with the hyphens, rather than quacking with underlined words -- especially if it's easier for you.



My vote stands. I'm pretty happy with it right now. Not that I'd be able to move it anyway, but you catch my drift.

[Tamuz]

Can someone wephwase the awguement against Twomz for me?

I mainwy see an attack against fishing and westwiction wewated... Not stwong enough fow me to vote him.Weww not stwong enough to vote fow my name bwothew TWOMZ.