Cultural Revolution is Over!

chamber · Post Post #1525 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:29 am

BabyJesus wrote:
vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.

Thats what they want you to think!!

BabyJesus · Post Post #1526 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:35 am

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.
Thats what they want you to think!!

maybe. Let's just lynch Pooky.

BabyJesus · Post Post #1527 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:35 am

chamber wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
vote Pooky

wouldn't mind lynching chamber either, I find it hard to believe neither side recruited him, as early as he came out.
Thats what they want you to think!!

who did you investigate btw....

VisMaior · Post Post #1528 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:41 am

Hmhm. Are we in a lylo yet? With 2 NKs thats still too many. cant be a lot of scum left, we were quiet good at killing them so far.

mystery meat of doom · Post Post #1529 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:35 am

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1530 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:10 am

VisMaior wrote:Hmhm. Are we in a lylo yet? With 2 NKs thats still too many. cant be a lot of scum left, we were quiet good at killing them so far.

Well, let's think. We started with 28 people, right? If 25% of the people we started with were scum, that would make around 7 bad guys at the start of the game. (With 2 recruiters making more bad guys, I would think that 25% scum might be a little high; I would guess it to be less, actually, but I guess it's hard to say without knowning more about the set-up.) We lynched 4 people who started the game as bad guys, and we lynched 1 recruit. So there might be three "starting" bad guys left, and like I figured out yesterday, there might be as many as 4 recruits left.

I doubt we're in lynch or lose, though, because while there could be a lot of bad guys left, they're most likely in at least two different group; I really doubt any group could have started with 2 recruiters and anyone else and have the game still be balanced. So I'm thinking the worst case senerio might be one group of at most 4 recruits, and one group of 3 scum. Or it could be one group of 3 or 4 and another triggered SK who just recently became active.

Twomz · Post Post #1531 (ISO) » Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:01 pm

I'm back. Chamber, if you have a guilty it would really help. If you don't, an innocent would help our chances of picking out scum a lot.

Also, we still haven't decided on the Chamber/Bacde/Shamrock deal, we need to decide before we get below 8 people if any or all the scum are hiding in that group.

Zindaras · Post Post #1532 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 8:53 am

I am somewhat suspicious of Pooky, but I don't like how BJ is going after Pooky.

What's up with the whole "I=awesome, listen to me and lynch who I tell you to lynch"-attitude?

Twomz · Post Post #1533 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:18 am

He's always had that. In fact there are several of those on this site. I only say it when I really mean it though

.

Bacde · Post Post #1534 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:29 am

I'd like to know Chamber's result.

chamber · Post Post #1535 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:41 pm

I have no intention of revealing my result yet.

Coron · Post Post #1536 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:05 pm

vote: chamber

that is not helpful.

Bacde · Post Post #1537 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:11 pm

Coron wrote:
vote: chamber
that is not helpful.

Sort of agreed.

Vaughn · Post Post #1538 (ISO) » Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:36 pm

I'm thinking it's more likely that there were 2 parties of scum, possibly mason-style with one of them as a recruiter, and perhaps 3-4 SK's?

It's likely that the two parties are down to 2/3 recruits in each, which means we have plenty of wiggle room. Hopefully we can get scum to kill each other off.

chamber · Post Post #1539 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:13 am

Coron wrote:
vote: chamber
that is not helpful.

If my result was currently relevent I'd reveal it. I know my result, you dont. Right now it is of almost no help to the town.

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #1540 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:42 am

vote: chamber

to follow up on my suspicions in previous days.

chamber · Post Post #1541 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:07 am

Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:
vote: chamber
to follow up on my suspicions in previous days.

Thats all you have, suspicioins. This late in the game you should be able to pull mroe on me then that.

Shamrock · Post Post #1542 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:26 am

Why do you want chamber's result so badly?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1543 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:34 am

Shamrock wrote:Why do you want chamber's result so badly?

Well, if I trusted him, I wouldn't mind letting him wait and letting him reveal his results when he wanted to.

However, because there seems to be chance that chamber is now scum, then letting him wait and only reveal results when he choses could let him hide his identiry and manipulate the town without giving us useful information; he could say he got a guilty on someone we were going to lynch anyway to make himself look better, or he could wait until someone dies and then say he got an innocent on them so as to not give the town any real information, or any number of other thigns.

chamber · Post Post #1544 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:44 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
Shamrock wrote:Why do you want chamber's result so badly?
Well, if I trusted him, I wouldn't mind letting him wait and letting him reveal his results when he wanted to.

However, because there seems to be chance that chamber is now scum, then letting him wait and only reveal results when he choses could let him hide his identiry and manipulate the town without giving us useful information; he could say he got a guilty on someone we were going to lynch anyway to make himself look better, or he could wait until someone dies and then say he got an innocent on them so as to not give the town any real information, or any number of other thigns.

I fully intened, as with pass days, to reveal the result before the day ends. Also its not guilty, if it were Id say it were relevent.

Twomz · Post Post #1545 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:48 am

Earlier in the game that was the best play. But since we don't have any leads now it might be a good idea to put any info on the table that would help us narrow the field of suspects.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1546 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:53 am

chamber wrote:
I fully intened, as with pass days, to reveal the result before the day ends. Also its not guilty, if it were Id say it were relevent.

Well, I appriciate that, but I still think that getting you to reveal your investigation now, instead of after you see how the day's discussion will go, may help give us a better idea about your alighnment.

Coron · Post Post #1547 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:56 am

It also helps us not spin our wheels on someone who might be confirmed.

chamber · Post Post #1548 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:09 am

Coron wrote:It also helps us not spin our wheels on someone who might be confirmed.

But I would enjoy seeing such a wagon before i come in to stop it.

Also the only reason you have to doubt me that I see, is that Id be a good cult recruit, but that’s complete wifom. Back it with behavioral evidence if you want to suggest I’m not town.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1549 (ISO) » Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:05 pm

chamber wrote: Also the only reason you have to doubt me that I see, is that Id be a good cult recruit, but that’s complete wifom.

Well, I'm not sure if it really is a WIFOM issue. You were clearly a threat to the cult, as soon as you got Fritzer lynched that was made clear. If they couldn't kill you because of doc protection or whatever, and if they could recruit you, I would expect them to try, to neutralize the threat you posed to them if nothing else.

Now, that dosn't mean you have been recruited, but you must admit you'd be a very logical target.