Post Restriction Mafia MEGA - It's Over!

[Glork]

You didn't say he faked a restriction, DGB. But he seems to have faked one.




It would appear as though you are scum.

[DrippingGoofball]

Yes! Then he did fake a post restriction. He/We/I don't have any.

[Glork]

Unvote DGB
Vote: Twomz

QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK!



I guess I'm not one to talk.

[Glork]

DGB, Vaughn practically stated that he had a quack restriction... er, post restriction. You are now claiming that neither of you have a quack restriction, when we are playing QUACK RESTRICTION MAIFA.


Explain to me the logic behind this.




Also, ChannelDelibird, get in here and vote DGB so that I may follow suit.

[DrippingGoofball]

MmmmM.... this is a bad turn of events... really... you don't want to visit this. There was a Vanilla Townie in Mini Post-Restriction, who didn't have a Restriction. This is the same, but different.

[Twomz]

You mean a scum who doesn't have a restriction?

unvote, vote: DG

.

So the deadline is June 21st?

OMGZ do you know what else happens on June 21st! FREAKEN NEW EPISODE OF PURE PWNAGE!!! wooooohhooooooooo! OMFG IT'S GONNA BE TEH AWESOMER!!!!

(Is that better Glork? At least I try to do my restriction in all my posts *cough cough*)

Again, as in all games i'm in, I don't mind being lynched, because i'm certain several scum are on my wagon (or attempting to get on it (TSS))

[DrippingGoofball]

That's IT? That's it, Twomz? You just vote for me because I have no restriction?

Remember what happened in Post-Restriction Mini when we lynched a Vanilla Townie who had no post restriction. Of course, I was scum in that game, so I was happy to lynch a Townie for ANY reason, but if it happened here, I would be sad. Especially since I am the non-post-restricted Townie.

SO: Lay off me, will you?

No more votes for DrippingGoofball.

Thank you.

[DrippingGoofball]

Twomz, you are really adorable in the rendition of your post restriction, BTW. You crack me up. Too bad I am not scum and you are.

[DrippingGoofball]

I just thought of something!

If I were scum, wouldn't I have hammered Twomz?

But I didn't. I wasn't sure, I have not directly interacted with him and I thought I should be wise and hold off.

Twomz, however, did not hesitate for one second to fuel a wagon initiated by MoS. Given his situation, it's a little reckless for Twomz to draw attention to himself in such a manner. I bet he's not scum.

As to the possibility of my being scumbuddies with Twomz, a cursory look at the games where I was scum should tell you that I do not hesitate to throw my partners under the bus if they slip up.

So think about this before you cast your votes.

[stikey]

I just thought of something!

If I were scum, wouldn't I have hammered Twomz?

But I didn't. I wasn't sure, I have not directly interacted with him and I thought I should be wise and hold off.

Twomz, however, did not hesitate for one second to fuel a wagon initiated by MoS. Given his situation, it's a little reckless for Twomz to draw attention to himself in such a manner. I bet he's not scum.

As to the possibility of my being scumbuddies with Twomz, a cursory look at the games where I was scum should tell you that I do not hesitate to throw my partners under the bus if they slip up.

So think about this before you cast your votes.

Holy boatload of WIFOM, Batman!

(Stupid smurfing restriction messes up this otherwise smurfy one-liner response. I smurf restrictions so much )

[DrippingGoofball]

stickey, you can thank (or smurf if you prefer) Glork and Twomz for creating this WIFOM, not me.

I am but an innocent victim.

[the silent speaker]

Innocent victim? I doubt that. For one thing, I had some issues with Vaughn besides the restriction thing that has just cropped up. For another, that was a really staggering WIFOM to be presented, as you did, as an inexorable case for innocence. Presening it as a WIFOM is one thing, but that isn't what you did.

Lastly, the restriction he claimed is not one a pro-town player would fake. Ruthless adherence to a ten-word restriction essentially takes him out of any discussions pre-emptively, which no pro-town player should want to do. Townies want to be heard. Only scum need to skate by without giving opinions. This is another hammer I would be happy to drop.

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

Creo que el Señor DrippingGoofball es más probable ser una persona mala sin una restriccíon que ser una persona buena sin una restriccíon.

De-voto, voto a DrippingGoofball

[Rosso Carne]

unvote, vote:DGB

yeah, umm, I guess Vaughn is one to do stupid stuff like that, but heh, thats just too much.


Just...please don't kill me tonight Twomz.

[thedocsalive]

M-M s-said: I t-think that M-mister DrippingGoofball is m-more likely to b-bea b-bad guy w-without a r-restriction than a g-good guy...um...uh...without a r-restriction. Unvote, V-vote DGB.

I agree h-here. Even if t-there are t-townies without r-restrictions, they are probably m-much fewer in n-number than t-townies with r-restrictions. It's v-very possible that DGB is l-lying. It is p-probable that the b-bad guys don't have any r-restrictions, so we c-can't let p-people off the h-hook that d-don't h-have any or l-lie about t-them, even if t-they are t-town. I also agree w-with TSS that t-this would be a t-terrible restriction to f-fake as a p-pro town p-player.

Unvote: T-twomz, V-vote: DrippingGoofball

[DrippingGoofball]

My only restriction is a compulsion to vote for Masons. That's it. No other restriction.

I don't have to hammer them! That would be ridiculous. Only vote for them. At least once.

My role is "Contractor." Yeah I know, it doesn't make all that much sense, but I hire Masons by voting for them. After I vote for a Mason, I receive a permission from the Mod to speak freely.

I can write whatever I want in my posts.

I don't know what Vaughn was up to. Obviously, he successfully voted a Mason which unlocked his temporary restriction to write only 10 words per post and vote. That's why now I can say anything I want. I guess there was a delay between the Mason vote and the Mod permission, so there are a few inconsistencies that can be explained that way.

You will all weep tomorrow when I am revealed to be a Townie upon my death.

[Twomz]

Erm...

My new mouse is so SHINY! It's a blue Razer Diamondback, and it glows blue. JUST LIKE MY PIMPIN LCD LIGHT ON THE BACK OF MY MONITOR .

... BS.

[ChannelDelibird]

Tempting, but I don't think I believe you. I mean, do you just hire a mason every time you vote for somebody? All this stuff happens at day rather than night? Dotdotdot.

And you say you're a Conquacktor then three paragraphs later you say you'll be revealed as a Townie.

Sorry to do this so soon after you replace in, but

unquack, Quack: DrippingGoofball

.

BFFoS: Twomz

[Yosarian2]

Dripping Goofballs claim makes no sense at all
Vaughn had a restriction, or not at all?
First she says he lied, then she said he did

vote:Dripping Goofball

, we are not stupid

[Glork]

Unquack Twomz
Quack Dripping Goofball

Scumbags, all of them!!

[stikey]

Yeah, there's no possible way that DG is smurfing the truth (that was hyperbole, not a statement actually smurfed on information that I know). You can't smurf a restriction in this game, then stop adhering to it, and expect that anyone is going to believe that you're not scum.

Unvote: Twomz

.

Vote: DrippingGoofball

.

[stikey]

Also, I'm going to

FOS: The Ducks

. They've collectively smurfed to include their restriction in too many posts to not have been mod-smurfed yet. I would imagine it would be a huge gamble for a scum group to all smurf the same restriction (assuming that scum don't have to adhere to a restriction, as in the previous Post-Restriction game) but it's something I can't rule out completely, given the number of times they didn't smurf to their restriction.

[DrippingGoofball]

Fools! Fools! You are making a huge mistake!

I tried to cover up my true role by inventing that Contractor business, it's not true. I was trying to make it easy for you, but clearly, you guys are too dense to pick up hints.

I am the Contractor, yes, that part is true, and I do have to vote for Masons. But I am also a rolefinder!

During Night 1, I rolebloked CES, on Night 2, I roleblocked Fritzler, and on Night 3, I rolebloked VisMaior.

It's a tragic coincidence that I only roleblocked dead guys, and they can't confirm me. But if you let me live tonight, I can prove myself.

Just give me one more night. I am innocent. I just don't have a post restriction. You can't lynch me for that.

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

No hay una noche tres, ¡La mierda del toro!

Confirmo votar a DrippingGoofball

[ChannelDelibird]

¡La mierda del toro!

Quote-quacked for coolness.

inventing that Contractor business, it's not true

LAL?

Also, your claimed role does too much (recruit Masons, rolequack, rolefind AND disable your post restriction) to seem plausible to me.

Confirm quack: DrippingGoofball