Untrod Tripod (3)- Empking, Plan B, JacobSavage
Empking (1)- Untrod Tripod
Not voting: N, 4nxi3ty, RedCoyote, F-16_Fighting_Falcon, adorkable, Gentlemen Bastards
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
9th December, 10pm AEDT
this comment stood out to me. (using hydra to sit on both sides of the issue?)In post 370, adorkable wrote:Town RBandtown Watcher make sense together balance-wise. My other head wants to note she thinks it's unlikely that we've outed two town PRs D1 and is initially inclined to think one of the two to be scum.
In post 571, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:@ Plan B, why did the TF hammer seem town to you?
In post 574, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:Plan B and Jacob, let me know what you think of Dooms final comments to UT at the end of D1 because we're both very confident that the interaction doesn't work from partner-to-partner.
In post 404, DoomYoshi wrote:UT: so you are purposely lurking to avoid drawing attention to yourself? That is pretty self-preservationist, so if you end upbeingsomething like a vig, I will just assume you are SK, and act accordingly.
In post 578, Plan B wrote:The second thing, and what gives me the most pause, is DoomYoshi's use of the word "being" as opposed to "claiming". That does seem like a slip that reveals that Untrod Tripod is Town, or at least not partnered with DoomYoshi. For them to be partners, DoomYoshi would have had to intentionally use that phrasing with the hope that it would preserve Untrod Tripod. That's something of a stretch, I know.
In post 577, 4nxi3ty wrote:this comment stood out to me. (using hydra to sit on both sides of the issue?)In post 370, adorkable wrote:Town RBandtown Watcher make sense together balance-wise. My other head wants to note she thinks it's unlikely that we've outed two town PRs D1 and is initially inclined to think one of the two to be scum.
the apologetic nature of their prod dodges bothers me as well.
vote: adorkable
GB 491 wrote:RC, Doom didn't 'push C+B' hard throughout the day at all, in fact if anything he defended them and was very waffly about them.
In post 578, Plan B wrote:Two things come to mind. One, now that Nero Cain is known Town, it's clear that DoomYoshi was able to deal out misinformation about Town players. If that's the case, it doesn't stretch credulity to believe he'd distance from a partner. He picked up the lurking thing against Untrod Tripod from your post followed by Untrod Tripod's answer. So, aligning himself with you in that way against a partner is not out of the question. Day 1 was almost over, so there was no real danger of creating a wagon on Untrod Tripod at that time. The second thing, and what gives me the most pause, isDoomYoshi's use of the word "being" as opposed to "claiming". That does seem like a slip that reveals that Untrod Tripod is Town, or at least not partnered with DoomYoshi.For them to be partners, DoomYoshi would have had to intentionally use that phrasing with the hope that it would preserve Untrod Tripod. That's something of a stretch, I know. I'm not sure that's enough to get me off wanting to lynch Untrod Tripod, though. I do think there's a high probability of scum in the five unknown alignment players I mentioned earlier, and Untrod Tripod is the scummiest of all five of you from my perspective.
In post 584, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Empire, you should probably post and give your reads. Right now, all I hear is Regfan saying "Empire is saying this, Empire is saying that, etc."
In post 586, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:I don't see mafia talking to a partner like that and the whole thing really really points strongly to UT-Town for us.
Also heads up: VCA is very very much overrated and generally quite useless.
In post 446, Empking wrote:That discussion doesn't look town to me. I don't think it looks scummy either; though you can justify anything (e.g. "Making a claim that only matters if an unclaimed player is a vig is a rather pointless, and is just fluff; possibly between buddies.@)
In post 581, Empking wrote:I think the whole unnaturalness of that discussion, including the silly phrasing, lends credence to the UT & DY being buddies hypothesis.
In post 583, RedCoyote wrote:I think adorkable or UT is the way forward today.
In post 587, Plan B wrote:What changed, from your point of view, to make the discussion more likely to indicate a scum-scum interaction than a null read on the interaction?
In post 584, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:N, Yoshi soft-pushed a whole bunch of people. What is your reasoning for specifically thinking that GB and UT are town because of it and not any other player?
In post 587, Plan B wrote:Breaking the game along those lines, I see two groups.
{Untrod Tripod, Empking, 4nxi3ty, Gentlemen Bastards, F-16_Fighting_Falcon} and {adorkable, JacobSavage, N, RedCoyote}
In post 589, N wrote:Why are you doing wagon analysis on the day 1 lynch, but not day 2? They were both on town in the end.
In post 588, Empking wrote:I paid less critical attention to my opinion the second time and fell foul to bias.
In post 592, Plan B wrote:In post 589, N wrote:Why are you doing wagon analysis on the day 1 lynch, but not day 2? They were both on town in the end.
It's the coincidence of the same group being on both that caught my attention when comparing the two wagons. I'm pretty sure I made that clear, and I don't understand the nature of your question.
In post 594, JacobSavage wrote:Helllooo......
In post 584, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Empire, you should probably post and give your reads. Right now, all I hear is Regfan saying "Empire is saying this, Empire is saying that, etc."
In post 596, Gentlemen Bastards wrote:I was on board with N-scum until I checked out his first, recently completed scum game. Regfan and I were both proceeding under the assumption that N was lurker scum here but his super tryhard attitude in that game gives me pause. It’s possible N’s just a guy who is overwhelmed by the size of large games generally hence his low content here.
In post 587, Plan B wrote:I agree, but why not pick a date for the dance?