Bastard Mod mafia - GAME OVER!

[Romanus]

Umm, Glork, we only get one lynch.

[TBuG]

Vote: Glork

Not OMGUS, my reasoning has little to do with myself. These:

But why are you so sure that Poppie isn't scum?

that is fishing

That's exactly what I'm referring to.


As is this:

And Glorkers, you seem very sure that Strudel hasn't been killing people. How do you know that exactly?

Well, with THAT interpretation I think there should be more fishing.

WRONG. It is up to the person to decide to come out or not. Fishing is scummy. You can ask for reasons for a vote, etc, but asking how someone knows something is fishing and scummy. Townies want power roles hidden, scum want to know the power roles because they are afraid of them.

Once again, Romanus hits the nail on the head. Trying to force information (note, even, that I have not claimed to *have* any role information, necessarily) out of someone this heavily is scummy. Add Dahen to my list of "Players that can die."

So, asking for reasoning of why someone

isn't

scum is now fishing? Funny how that works out.

[dahen]

vote Glork

I'm mad at you at the moment. Maybe it affects my judgement (feel free to think "backpedaling!" here), but something needs to be done. I think you have a terrible view on what are valid questions. It's not like the questioned player HAS to answer in a certain fasion.

We want people to say things. Asking questions is an important part of the game. If you think that my question is scummy, then you should be happy because in your view it helps you find scum. The problem is that you seem to be more worried about the possible effects of the question ("forcing information") than the question itself.

You seem over-protective of others in a fasion that I often see scum do.

[M4yhem]

Um...yeah. As other people have said, asking questions is not the same as fishing. It was a reasonable request for information and I expect a reasonable answer. I think Glork and Romanus should know better than to call it fishing.

I still say we lynch Strudelkins. Information about 2 investigative roles pwns you all.

[Romanus]

Let me rephrase the question so that it is no longer fishing.

Glork, on the other hand, is right that we should lynch scum. But why are you so sure that Poppie isn't scum?

And Glorkers, you seem very sure that Strudel hasn't been killing people. How do you know that exactly?

The question should be phrased as such:

What is the argument against Pop Tart being scum? We have two investigations(???) against him. Until you give me something, my vote stays where it is at.

This does not demand info that Glork may have. However, if he does have some, if he can't sway us otherwise he may be forced to produce the info, but that is his choice.

By the way, I understand, especially in this game why someone would fish for info other than trying to find power roles. The setup makes the quest for any real info a must.

[Toaster Strudel]

Two investigations on me? I thought it was ONE, by someone who is paranoid.

I will say this, though. Glork seems to KNOW that I am not scum. Know what I mean? He knows that I am not his scumbuddy. Unless this game is crawling with naive, paranoid, or other types of cops.

[Romanus]

Me, the supposedly paranoid cop and the voice. That makes two. We also don't know that I am paranoid. DGB was one guilty I got, and I think he was scum. My info agrees with the voice and who knows about CES.

[M4yhem]

Romanus- Meh. I assumed that you would all know what I meant. It didn't even cross my mind that Glork might have some 'special' information so basically, all I wanted to know about was his arguements.

Now let's sum up. We have two guiltys on Strudel; one from a possibly paranoid cop who correctly got DGB as a badGIRL (I think we all agree she was the sk) and one from a 'voice' that I assume belongs to Primate (rolename fits) who has got one correct innocent and can't be naive, paranoid or crazy, because it got a mixture of results and one correct one, but could still be random.

By lynching Strudel we can possibly clear PBug and Romanus and cast suspicion on CES.

In addition to that, Toaster has claimed a role that doesn't fit with the theme (too nice) sounds suspiciously similar to DGB's fakeclaim and which wouldn't help the town if it was real anyway.

Add to that the fact that Masterchief was acting shady and that he never mentioned his role's similarity to DGB's when She was under pressure, and this starts to look like the best lynch I've ever seen.

What are we waiting for exactly?

Confirm to the max! vote: Toaster Strudel

[Glork]

PBuG, CES, MC, and Dahen. Each and every one of them. Maybe even M4yhem... but I'll have to look at his predecessor's posts to see what I think of him as a whole.

You want MC to be lynched, but not TS?

vote Glork

.

Um... fuck.

TS replaced MC, didn't he?

[ChannelDelibird]

I'll go along with PBuG for now, simply because I think we can get more information on other players by lynching TS.

unvote, vote: Toaster Strudel

@ Glork: Yes, he did.

[Glork]

Hum.

Even I don't know how I'm going to explain

this

one...

[Thok]

Hum.

Even I don't know how I'm going to explain

this

one...

Anybody for a lynch TS, vig Glork?

[ChannelDelibird]

I'd rather you didn't try to direct my targets, Thok.

[Thok]

I'd rather you didn't try to direct my targets, Thok.

Fair enough.

[M4yhem]

@Glork: How about you just admit that you haven't been reading the thread properly? I mean, you didn't realise PBug had admitted to lying about his cop claim. Even I knew that, and I just got here!

[dahen]

Even if I like my Glork vote, I agree Strudel is probably a better play now that I've calmed down a bit.

unvote, vote: Toaster Strudel

[Toaster Strudel]

Glork + PBuG = scum.

It's a good idea for you guys to lynch me, it will confirm a lot of stuff for you. I agree with the people that are voting for me.

Can I hammer myself now, Glork?

[Toaster Strudel]

I still win.

[Glork]

@Glork: How about you just admit that you haven't been reading the thread properly? I mean, you didn't realise PBug had admitted to lying about his cop claim. Even I knew that, and I just got here!

I admit that I got confused and forgot that MC and TS were the same person.

I don't think that TS is scum, but I felt that MC's behavior was scummy enough to warrant a lynch. That's why I said I wanted MC lynched but was defending TS.

[TBuG]

Glork + PBuG = scum.

What...?

Unvote; HAMMAH: Toaster Strudel

We can lynch Glork tomorrow.

[M4yhem]

Is he dead yet? Can we start the celebrations?

[Toaster Strudel]

Yes! Let's start the celebrations. Cuz I WON!!!

Thanks for the hammer. Party time! Drinks are on me.

[M4yhem]

You can stop pretending any time you like, Strudel...

uh oh

[Glork]

:badlynch:

[VisMaior]

Toaster Strudel 7 (M4yhem,CES,Der Hammer,ubertimmy,CDB,dahen,PBug)
PBug 1 (Glork)
Glork 1 (Thok)

So you string up Toaster Strudel. Or, you would, if he would not already have won. As such, he is simply removed from the game.

Toaster Strudel, the winner, has been disconsidered from the game!

Its night! Choices ASAP!