In post 374, Johhog wrote:The Vi wagon is meh. I think it looks like normal Vi. I prefer this one.
VOTE: Cogito Ergo Sum
Playing very differently from Team Mafia, where he was town.
Team Mafia is a bad example of town CES.
In post 374, Johhog wrote:The Vi wagon is meh. I think it looks like normal Vi. I prefer this one.
VOTE: Cogito Ergo Sum
Playing very differently from Team Mafia, where he was town.
In post 325, Llamarble wrote:
I do intend to towninate, just not in my accustomed post 150 times D1 fashion.
In post 333, Shadoweh wrote:In post 332, Nachomamma8 wrote:
It's too early for you to be attacking N for playing to his troll scum meta. He does this as town as well; the difference is that he actually steps it the fuck up as town when he gets something he cares about. I seriously doubt that N is going to play in an invitational with a playerlist like this and expect to get away with doing nothing.
He kinda is trying to get away with doing nothing so far though.
In post 344, Tammy wrote:So yes, in my eyes you are capable of reading dv - at least better than me - so I'm interested in your thoughts on the matter. I'm not saying I expect you to be right early day one or anything as I remember you town reading him day one in that game too.
I've answered this already.
And yet, this is a good chunk of the playerlist that was in Black Flag Nightless as well, both as his scumbuddies and as the Town who caught him. So no, I don't see why he should have a particular level of motivation to be playing better. Goodness knows I'd be curled up in a corner in a ball of sad if I had drawn scum.In post 371, DeasVail wrote:I'm going to go with leaning town on N. Following his success in NY 160, I'd expect him to be more motivated as scum with this kind of playerlist (he knows that he can fool good players) and try harder to look town. Compared to here, he was just a lot more pro-town there, and that's more the kind of thing I'd expect. I don't think the reasons behind the wagon are all that bad, I just don't really agree.
Stop looking so Town, you. I will not have this kind of competition.In post 363, Empire wrote:@CTD (#311): Erm, it wasn't supposed to be a suggestion, I made it pretty explicit that I thought that post was scummy. You're basically expressing suspicion on the two of us while keeping your vote on Llamarble and commenting on us both without taking a more clear stance on which of us you think comes off worse in it just makes it seem like you're trying to encourage the argument rather than trying to glean meaningful information from it. And I don't see a BoP aspect to Shadoweh's argument which is why I haven't responded to it + I've already suggested I'm somewhat leaning town on her though it's been reinforced by her recent posting.
In post 381, Tierce wrote:And yet, this is a good chunk of the playerlist that was in Black Flag Nightless as well, both as his scumbuddies and as the Town who caught him. So no, I don't see why he should have a particular level of motivation to be playing better. Goodness knows I'd be curled up in a corner in a ball of sad if I had drawn scum.
In post 382, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Team Mafia was such a perfect storm. I don't expect a game with that high a rhetoric:scumhunting ratio to come around for me for a while.
Benmage, the change that 'marble mentioned predates this game (see norlkaz) so it's not a tell.
In post 347, Shadoweh wrote:
Tammy are you ignoring me on purpose stop it. One liners from you are weird even if they're in post chains.
In post 349, Shadoweh wrote:
Tammy usually posts huge blocks ofangry textinsights into how she feels about a person so one-liners that don't sound mad are strange. Also telling N to unsnark when compared to his other games he's not snarking. I would prefer he try to show some sort of personal opinion. I would imagine you want him to try and give out real opinions too, especially if he is scum.
In post 363, Empire wrote:
@Tammy:Echoing Shadoweh's sentinments, I'm not getting the super warm and fuzzy townie vibes from your posts but I know you've said you sometimes struggle on D1. Please towninate, too.
In post 371, DeasVail wrote:Shadoweh, CTD is still kind of null. Maybe a little scummy, but reading his posts it's like "This tells me nothing about your alignment. WHHHHYYYYY?"
I'm going to go with leaning town on N. Following his success in NY 160, I'd expect him to be more motivated as scum with this kind of playerlist (he knows that he can fool good players) and try harder to look town. Compared to here, he was just a lot more pro-town there, and that's more the kind of thing I'd expect. I don't think the reasons behind the wagon are all that bad, I just don't really agree.
In post 374, Johhog wrote:The Vi wagon is meh. I think it looks like normal Vi. I prefer this one.
VOTE: Cogito Ergo Sum
Playing very differently from Team Mafia, where he was town.
Llamarble wrote:How does one justify a vote without talking about the thought process that led to it?
I'm pretty clearly (IMO) talking about how things looked to me after some re-reading, not about why I voted CTD.
It was indeed the attacking two persons and voting one of them (chained together in this particular manner) that bugged me, not a 'voting someone other than the person they are attacking' scenario. I'll admit I could be clearer on that.
Llamarble wrote:I believe my wagon was large enough and scummy enough in character that it's a solid way to make the problem smaller.
Empire wrote:@CTD (#311): Erm, it wasn't supposed to be a suggestion, I made it pretty explicit that I thought that post was scummy. You're basically expressing suspicion on the two of us while keeping your vote on Llamarble and commenting on us both without taking a more clear stance on which of us you think comes off worse in it just makes it seem like you're trying to encourage the argument rather than trying to glean meaningful information from it. And I don't see a BoP aspect to Shadoweh's argument which is why I haven't responded to it + I've already suggested I'm somewhat leaning town on her though it's been reinforced by her recent posting.
In post 365, Benmage wrote:In post 311, CrashTextDummie wrote:I am not currently interested in a Vi wagon though.
Why not?
Nachomamma8 wrote:It's too early for you to be attacking N for playing to his troll scum meta. He does this as town as well; the difference is that he actually steps it the fuck up as town when he gets something he cares about. I seriously doubt that N is going to play in an invitational with a playerlist like this and expect to get away with doing nothing.
In post 397, Empire wrote:Tammy, why are you such a NEGATIVE NANCY?