I'm the "Statistics Keeper", who keeps all the files about the townspeople. I pick a player each night, and get something out of their file about their profile, whether it be a rolename or an occupation.
You want results, too? StD is a
I think it's best if ya'll follow my example. *polishes apples*Save The Dragons wrote:Unvote
Mainly based off of this post.TheEyeOfMordor wrote:Yes I am here. I would rather not talk about Zindaras's assertion that I am town but I will assure you that I don't know anything about what he is saying. And I might need a replacement soon seeing that I am leaving for the States on the 18th to 29th of December.
Vote: TSQ
No pariah obvFritzler wrote:duhZindaras wrote:*laughs*
Hey Fritz, who should we be voting?
katy
Oh sweet, I get a patch.... Crap, that means all my revisions are meaningless! Hmm... we'll see how it turns out.Pariah wrote:No pariah obvFritzler wrote:duhZindaras wrote:*laughs*
Hey Fritz, who should we be voting?
katy
PJ and Alko are having me write a patch to the game document because they can't understand my design file. (What's so hard about it?! D: ) I'm visiting my mother at the moment, but things are getting pretty good around here so if Alko would like I can take the ship back again, but it's his game as far as I am concerned since he kept things going through the deadline. Godspeed you drinking buddy of mine.
EDIT: Wait what? I'm not visiting my mother. I'm going there soon. I need more sleep.
You were the one closest to being lynched. And I think you're scummy, too.Thestatusquo wrote:What have I done to be the play at deadline?
Uhh, yeah, I had a thought, then I had to write a DP and I forgot.Thestatusquo wrote:I'm still curious as to why I'm the vote leader, perhaps it has something to do with me being voted by two people not actually playing the game since the random voting stage. Zindaras, if theres no reason for your vote other than me being the second most besides katy, then I think it's a horrible idea to vote me off
1) The OMGUS vote of someone I put forth a half baked theory about p1, and
2) A player who is not even playing the game voting me with no analysis.
:rolleyes:
I don't really think you have; I just hadn't bothered to reply to your argument yet. The major point of my comment was that the only constructive thing you've seem to be doing in this game is saying "I don't understand this wagon, give reasoning! I don't understand this wagon, give reasoning!" There are times where it's good not to give reasoning, as you can gain valuable information by seeing how people respond to things. Moreover, both Thesp and I had given reasons why we were suspicious of Katy by your post (specifically that she seemed more interested in other concerns then finding scum).Illumina wrote:Also, dahen: welcome to the game. I feel I've debunked Thok'smisrepresentationpost about me, and based on your post you objected for the same reasons Thok did. (This is especially convenient, as it means I've essentially debunked your post pre-emptively ). I think it's a little odd that you immediately sided with Thok on that point -- noted for future reference.
You also imply that I would have been more productive if I'd voted for someone, which I disagree with.
I also don't see compelling evidence for TSQ yet. I know we have a deadline, but I'm not enthusiastic about him as a lynch candidate.