You didn't seem to want proof here.Fircoal wrote:Vote: Ernie. That's for voting for me.
And you didn't unvote through all your posts until the mod ignored your vote for him.
You didn't seem to want proof here.Fircoal wrote:Vote: Ernie. That's for voting for me.
It was a random vote at the beginning, you don't need to vote with proof until it gets more serous. As for not unvoting, that was an accident. I meant to unvote Ernie went I voted for the mod.ShadowLurker wrote:You didn't seem to want proof here.Fircoal wrote:Vote: Ernie. That's for voting for me.
And you didn't unvote through all your posts until the mod ignored your vote for him.
I'm not sure Ernie intended toPatrick wrote:Why did Ernie intend to hammer Nightfall? It's too early and any case against him seems minimal.
Please specify what these good reasons are.Ernie wrote:I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.
Patrick wrote:It's out of boredom that nothing seems to be going on.
Why did Ernie intend to hammer Nightfall? It's too early and any case against him seems minimal.Unvote, vote: Ernie
He wanted to find out if someone will hammer? Meaning that he knew he wasn't hammering and was waiting to find out if someone will hammer. Which I really can't see meaning that he intended to hammer.Ernie wrote:Unvote
Vote Nightfall
Let's say I want to find out if someone will hammer...
Secound that. Like what? You stated as only reason that you were waiting to see if someone hammers.Fircoal wrote:Like what?Ernie wrote:*shrug* Vote for me if you want to, but I'm not unvoting Nightfall, there's as many good reasons to vote for him than for voting for anyone else.