Open 9 - Basic Twelve Player (Game Over!) - before 400

[The Central Scrutinizer]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Seriously, I thought SL was an experienced player.

[spectrumvoid]

SL is an experienced player.

[ShadowLurker]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

What would you like me to expand upon thouth unworthy mortal?

[ShadowLurker]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

I'm only 10 days more experienced than you so don't try to pull that newb card.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

I'm only 10 days more experienced than you so don't try to pull that newb card.

I'm not playing any newb card.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

SL is an experienced player.

Then can YOU explain his posts?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

HOS: ShadowLurker

I really don't like how he pops in once a page and comes up with (different) scumgroups, but on the whole contributes shit-all to the discussion. And what he has contributed has been self-contradictory. I don't like how he FoS'd IH, voted him, retracted the vote (all without stating the reason), and now does not hammer him, I don't like how he once exonerated AndrewS by calling him "certain" town and now declares AndrewS to be part of the mafia.

In fact, I find this ridiculous.

unvote, vote: Shadowlurker

, who is obvious scum along with IH.

What would you like me to expand upon thouth unworthy mortal?

Sorry for the triple... I want you to explain

1) Why IH was scummy and then stopped being so in your eyes, not hammering him, and not even mentioning his wagon in your posts.

2) Why Andrews had a "huge town tell" that made you "almost certain" of his innocence, but is now part of the scumgroup.

[IH]

Err, why am I scummy in

your

eyes TCS? I mean, yes you have found some flaws with Shadow Lurker's posts, which have been noted, but my question has yet to be answered.

[ShadowLurker]

I'm sorry I didn't find the scumgroup 100% on page 3 or whatever and changed my mind, that obviously makes me scum I guess.

1) Why IH was scummy and then stopped being so in your eyes, not hammering him, and not even mentioning his wagon in your posts.

I wanted to see a reaction, he had been lurking. While he is still lurking, I didn't really find anything unsual to warrant him being lynched. Glad you find my position switch so alarming yet no one elses.

2) Why Andrews had a "huge town tell" that made you "almost certain" of his innocence, but is now part of the scumgroup.

Plz read the preceding page.

[Akbar]

@TCS Time out! You are convinced IH is scum. And now you've added Shadowlurker to the list. But, instead of keeping your vote on a "scum" with 4 votes on him, close to getting convicted, you unvote and move your vote to the "scum" with no votes on him?

Whats wrong with this picture?

[spectrumvoid]

SL is an experienced player.

Then can YOU explain his posts?

No. Are you hoping I'll provide your scum buddy with some good excuse so he can pass it off as his own?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Err, why am I scummy in

your

eyes TCS? I mean, yes you have found some flaws with Shadow Lurker's posts, which have been noted, but my question has yet to be answered.

I have something which I consider to be a scumtell, but I am

not

making the mistake of giving it away. Suffice it to say that if one was to look at your posts in isolation, one would find something that gives it away.

@TCS Time out! You are convinced IH is scum. And now you've added Shadowlurker to the list. But, instead of keeping your vote on a "scum" with 4 votes on him, close to getting convicted, you unvote and move your vote to the "scum" with no votes on him?

Whats wrong with this picture?

Because SL deserves my vote... though, you've got a point. We should lynch IH first to validate my theory.

unvote, vote: IH

[Fircoal]

@TCS Time out! You are convinced IH is scum. And now you've added Shadowlurker to the list. But, instead of keeping your vote on a "scum" with 4 votes on him, close to getting convicted, you unvote and move your vote to the "scum" with no votes on him?

Whats wrong with this picture?

Because SL deserves my vote... though, you've got a point. We should lynch IH first to validate my theory.

unvote, vote: IH

Your changing your vote when you got pressured too.

FOS: TCS

[Twito]

Haha I never looked the "Joined" dates before!!1 You are all punch of noobs! Holyshit!!111 Feeling very 1337z0rx

[Patrick]

Deadline 18th of february. It can be extended or removed if discussion picks up again.

[spectrumvoid]

I'm extremely wary of the way TCS is jumping through hoops held by Akbar.

FOS: both of them

Scum buddy leading scum buddy.

[Battle Mage]

god, can we lynch TCS yet?
hes been acting so obviously scummy its untrue!

[Akbar]

I'm extremely wary of the way TCS is jumping through hoops held by Akbar.

FOS: both of them

Scum buddy leading scum buddy.

FOS SV

for framing.

You conveniently left out the part about me threatening to lynch TCS if IH is town.

Why isn't IH lynched yet?

Ok, I'll help ya bandwagon. Of course, if he turns out to be town, this combined with my earlier suspicion of you, will confirm your scum.

Vote IH

[ShadowLurker]

I'm extremely wary of the way TCS is jumping through hoops held by Akbar.

FOS: both of them

Scum buddy leading scum buddy.

FOS SV

for framing.

You conveniently left out the part about me threatening to lynch TCS if IH is town.

Why isn't IH lynched yet?

Ok, I'll help ya bandwagon. Of course, if he turns out to be town, this combined with my earlier suspicion of you, will confirm your scum.

Vote IH

That makes you even more suspicious.

Unvote Vote Akbar

[IH]

SL, I think you should revise your list to

Akbar/Lowell/TCS

[Akbar]

SL, I think you should revise your list to

Akbar/Lowell/TCS

I think your still upset cuz I lynched you on Day 1 of our newbie game

[Twito]

I'm extremely wary of the way TCS is jumping through hoops held by Akbar.

FOS: both of them

Scum buddy leading scum buddy.

FOS SV

for framing.

You conveniently left out the part about me threatening to lynch TCS if IH is town.

Why isn't IH lynched yet?

Ok, I'll help ya bandwagon. Of course, if he turns out to be town, this combined with my earlier suspicion of you, will confirm your scum.

Vote IH

That comment just gained a vote.

Unvote
Vote: Akbar

for being obvious scum.

[Patrick]

A votecount for your consumption

Battle Mage (1) -- Ripley
IH (4) -- Lowell, Akbar, AndrewS, The Central Scrutiniser
The Central Scrutiniser (1) -- Battle Mage
Ripley (2) -- Fircoal, Spectrumvoid
Lowell (1) -- IH
Akbar (2) -- Shadowlurker, Twito

Not Voting: Nobody
11 alive, 6 to lynch. 4 to lynch at deadline.

[IH]

Damn speedlynchers = |