Policy Discussion: Banning Players

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
Less than scum
Posts: 3827
Joined: February 25, 2005
Location: London Alignment: Lawful Evil

Post Post #1 (isolation #0) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:25 am

Post by Mr Stoofer »

I take the view that a person running a game has a discretion as to who he will allow in, for a number of reasons. It takes a lot of work to write a good set-up and a mod is entitled to take steps to avoid that work being ruined by any one individual. Likewise, replacing players is a stressful and time-consuming activity and a mod is entitled to take preventitve action to reduce the chances of this happening. And I think it is a bad idea in general to force mods to accept players that they don't want in their games. It is a recipe for strife and disaster.

1. Do you feel experience requirements are acceptable in Large (Theme/Normal) games?

Yes, at the discretion of the individual mod.

2. If so, do you think they would be appropriate for other types of games, such as Mini Theme games?

I would suggest the following rule (which I think is a codification of current practice): The general rule is that there are no entry requirements for Mini games. Any mod wanting to impose an entry requirement in a Mini game has to convince MeMe that there is a good reason for such requirement.

3. Should Mods be allowed to ban specific players from their games?

Yes.

4. If so, what reasons are acceptable for doing so?

I wouldn't want a closed list of reasons. Good reasons would include someone whom the mod has had to replace before, or who has caused trouble in a game before.
Last edited by Mr Stoofer on Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
Less than scum
Posts: 3827
Joined: February 25, 2005
Location: London Alignment: Lawful Evil

Post Post #8 (isolation #1) » Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:47 am

Post by Mr Stoofer »

MrBuddyLee wrote:
5. How should inactivity to the point of replacement be discouraged across multiple games?

By requiring replaced players to replace into and partcipate in a running game in need before they're able to sign up for another new game. This site would benefit from the concept of "replace-debt".
Genius. No excuses - if you've been replaced you have to replace somone else.
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
Less than scum
Posts: 3827
Joined: February 25, 2005
Location: London Alignment: Lawful Evil

Post Post #38 (isolation #2) » Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:27 am

Post by Mr Stoofer »

Adele wrote:I guess what I'm saying is, why are invitationals by permission only?
I think this discussion has moved over into the subject area of Policy Discussion: Invitationals. Although I accept there is an overlap.

I always understood that there was a difference between:

1
. An Invitational -- which operates outside the List system, and requires permission

2
. A game within the List system, which the Mod notifies to some people before general sign-ups open -- which I always assumed was permissible -- it certainly happens a lot and there has been no attempt by authority to ban it.

I understood that this thread was talking about, amongst other things, Type 1 and that Policy Discussion: Invitationals is the place to discuss Type 2.

Return to “Mafia Discussion”