Wow, a lot to respond to. I have two posts - one principally responding to VitaminR, and one principally responding to theopor. Theopor post will follow.
Fircoal wrote:Seol, I agree with you on your suspicions on Theopor_Cod, and lack of them on Azkar. Though I think Thesp is lurking to much to be cleared. Avinyl is also scummy to me in the same ways that he is scummy to Seol.
I wouldn't say I consider Thesp cleared, but then again I wouldn't consider him lurking either. He's definitely not contributing as much as I'd like or expect, but he is here and keeping us abreast of his current position.
VitaminR wrote:Heh. I'm so going to get myself lynched...
VitaminR wrote:Don't fault yourself if you end up lynching me, I screwed up as an IC here, I think.
VitaminR wrote:I don't really expect anyone to follow me at this point.
VitaminR wrote:My Seol vote was way too late and at a point where my credibility in this game was pretty much gone anyway.
That's an
awful
lot of sympathy plays there...
VitaminR wrote:Seol: he only focused on me and I felt he was avoiding your wagon. Also, from his earlier comment about you (which I will quote below this) I thought he saw you in the same way and I wanted to see if he would stick to that. I find the fact that he hasn't pretty scummy.
VitaminR wrote:Seol wrote:I don't have a good handle on theopor_COD yet. He's wagon-happy, and says he's confident in his position, but I don't think his reasoning as I understand it is compelling. I'd say he looks scummy in a vacuum, but it's not in the least atypical for newbies nowadays.
Hmm... that was in response to my question, wasn't it? Then I'm remembering it wrong.
The one you quoted was because I felt he was focusing on me, asking him for an opinion after the debate was because I wanted to see whether or not he would do the convenient thing and change his position.
VitaminR wrote:Thesp wrote:Seol, what do you think of theopor_COD?
I'd like to hear this too.
Azkar, you make some good points, but I'm just not sold on the wagon. I don't see it.
Those are the quotes you're referring to, in the order you referenced them, right?
Are you confused about what happened here? Because bearing in mind the chronology of what happened, your comments make no sense.
VitaminR wrote:"Resolve a sticking point" seemed quite vague to me. I didn't read it as a clear statement of your position.
Ah, well, the combination of the full comment ("Now, I don't like this resolution a great deal, but it does resolve the sticking-point I had") and the lack of unvote seemed to be a reasonably clear statement to me. Are you arguing that it was intended to be vague, or that it wasn't intended to be a statement of position?
VitaminR wrote:I did not blindly agree with you in the debate and I presented explanations that should cause a change in perspective. As you yourself indicated, your opinion did improve. As a result, you should have scrutinised your vote.
Your explanations
should
result in a change of perspective? Surely that's up to me to judge? And yes, my opinion improved, relative to the point where it appeared to me you were flatly contradicting yourself in every post. I was still suspicious of you, and (prior to the re-read which I needed to get a handle on the rest of the game) I didn't have any firm suspicions on anyone else. So I kept my vote on you.
VitaminR wrote:As for the Azkar wagon, Seol didn't comment on it as it was going on. He attacked me when it was winding down.
VitaminR wrote:Azkar-Thesp: Thesp essentially just waved away the Fircoal-Azkar thing, commenting on it afterwards. If they were scumbuddies, he would not dismiss a case that was that prominent so easily. If Azkar turns up scum, it is too damning a mark on his record. He's too experienced a player to make that kind of mistake.
I'm not seeing the difference. I ignored the wagon (along with the rest of the game - not that that's justifiable, just trying to put it in context), which therefore links me and Azkar. Thesp, who actually was here, was ignoring the wagon, and it's a sign they're
not
linked... except that if Azkar is scum, it's a black mark against Thesp (i.e., it's a sign they're linked... if it suits you).
You're taking the same behaviour and saying it means X in one case and not-X in another. Isn't this just a case of you interpreting the evidence in whatever manner is most convenient for you?