Mafia 61: No Theme - Game over!

spectrumvoid · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:02 am

Oh. Oops. Ok, I'll go read.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:29 am

I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).

spectrumvoid · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:43 am

I didn't get a prod. Ask the mod if you don't believe me. What happened is I was trying to click on mafia 58, where I'd volunteered to be a replacement, just to check if I'd been taken. (This is because I've been away). I clicked on 61 entirely by mistake, saw my name there, and decided to check.

Note also that I'm active in ALL my games no matter whatever the role I have, errors permitting.

AndrewS · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:57 am

SV didn't get a prod because I didn't notice that he hadn't been posting. Chibo has been warned that if he doesn't post something constructive, he will be replaced. Any other requests?

AndrewS · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:52 am

Prodding the following:

ac1983fan
Battle Mage
Keys Myaths
Paper
Pevergreen

Twito · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:05 am

Dragon Phoenix wrote:I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).

So you suspect her of being a townie and that's why you might vote her soon?

Paper · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:46 am

I'm around but very busy. Going back to read.

Battle Mage · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:00 am

wow. a prod.

I dont really have anything else to say atm, other than that i think RR's arguments are getting annoying. Im still happy with my vote for now.
BM

AndrewS wrote:Prodding the following:

ac1983fan

Battle Mage

Keys Myaths
Paper
Pevergreen

Twito · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 am

Battle Mage wrote:wow. a prod.
I dont really have anything else to say atm, other than that i think RR's arguments are getting annoying. Im still happy with my vote for now.
BM

GETTING annoying?

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:37 pm

OK, I'm gonna be frank here - the wagon on me has no base other than people calling me annoying and the pevergreen vote. If you honestly want to lynch me for that, go ahead. There's nothing I can actually say to defend myself from ad hominem. Not gonna argue with Twito anymore, since it's so incredibly useless.

Ta.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:45 pm

[quote="IH"]err, no not really I don't find it fallacious at all. You said "Let's get down to playing the game." You have posted some very distracting posts that really didn't have anything to do with the game. MoS Seems to be accusing you of that.

How is this fallacious?
[quote]

MoS accused the whole group of people who spammed on page 9 (?) for distracting the game. Lets have a look at the group:

1. RR - 2 joke posts and strategy thread advertisment (I'm not counting the argument with Firecoal since it was sorta relevant).
2. Cheesefan & Firecoal - Lots and lots of irrelevant stuff. Like 10 each.
3. TWITO - 5 completely irrelevant posts.

Now, MoS suspects this whole bunch of people. His reaction - vote RR, FoS Cheesefan & Firecoal & IGNORE Twito. Doesn't make sense.

Still, like I said, want to lynch me for "being annoying"? That's totally fine.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:51 pm

Twito wrote:
Dragon Phoenix wrote:I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).
So you suspect her of being a townie and that's why you might vote her soon?

Is this a serious question?

Twito · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:39 pm

Dragon Phoenix wrote:
Twito wrote:
Dragon Phoenix wrote:I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).
So you suspect her of being a townie and that's why you might vote her soon?
Is this a serious question?

No, I got what you meant.

Twito · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:41 pm

RR keeps repeating words "ad hominem" as his only defence. He really should stop it it's making him look more of an idiot than he really is.. or who knows maybe he really is that much of an idiot. Also it's not proper defence. His only other type of defence is trying to divert suspicion on other people voting him.
He is trying to put down the whole case againts him as "ad hominem". Yeah right. Bye scum.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:01 pm

RR keeps repeating words "ad hominem" as his only defence.

Attack me with something that

isn't

irrelevant personal slander, I'll defend myself in a way that

isn't

calling ad hominem.

This is quite possibly my last direct response to you in this game.

Twito · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:19 pm

Raging Rabbit wrote:This is quite possibly my last direct response to you in this game.

Thank god! SHUT UP AND DIE!

mole · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:38 am

Wow, harsh.

Unvote: MoS

Vote: Rand Althor

I don't get it. Why those three?

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 3:00 am

I want everyone on my wagon to consider the following question - if I get replaced, will you unvote me?

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:01 am

Also, since instead of actually listening to what I'm trying to say people just use every single post of mine as an exuse to more bunnyhate, I probably won't be posting in this thread for quite a while.

Twito - dance your fucking heart out.

Twito · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:19 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:I want everyone on my wagon to consider the following question - if I get replaced, will you unvote me?

No.

I don't hate you actually I'm starting to like you. I loved you from the first sight but I guess you knew that.

Fircoal · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:50 am

RR, is acting very scummy. Fos: RR

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:55 am

I'm getting replaced here. If you want to lynch my replacement for being formerly me, go ahead.

Twito: your latest comment was one of the most hypocrital things I've ever seen. Just figured I'd let you know.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:08 am

RR, I'm also voting you for being the most vocal about attacking me for my dice roll, which was a really dumb and scummy attack.

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:10 am

It was a pretty dumb and pretty scummy play, and I feel I explained myself enough on it. Never voted you or pushed for your lynch, though.

Twito · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:It was a pretty dumb and pretty scummy play, and I feel I explained myself enough on it. Never voted you or pushed for your lynch, though.

I surely felt like you pushed his lynch for it.