Open 13 - Double Cop (GAME OVER) - before 405

[Twito]

-----------------------------------

((TWITO EDIT))

--------------------------------------------

"Hey let's compete who can lay down longer in a pile of snow!", yells dcowboys enthusiastically. And so you go outside and lie in the snow. Everybody obviously took a bottle of alcohol with them as otherwise this wouldn't be any fun. One by one you return to sauna as you finish you bottles all blue and shit. After a while there are 6 of you in sauna throwing more water to the kiuas. Time passes and as everyone is finishing their 3rd bottle of 'Karhu' -beer you notice there is plenty of 'Lapin Kulta' -beer left. Who drinks 'Lapin Kulta'? "Dcowboys!", you all scream together with drunken voices. You go out and notice blue dcowboys still laying in the snow hugging his empty bottle. You drag him inside the sauna, put him to the highest lauteelle and wait for him to recover..

Look-I-am-all-blue-Votecount:

dcowboys055: 3 (IH, spectrumvoid, Mr Stoofer)

Fircoal: 1 (Romanus)
Romanus: 1 (Blackberry)
Mr Stoofer: 1 (dcowboys055)

Not voting: 1 (Fircoal)

[Romanus]

I thought I unvoted, but anyway

UNVOTE

[dcowboys055]

sorry i was gone. what explaining do i have to do? what have i done scummy?

[dcowboys055]

SV.

1.He said "Romanus needs to contribute, if he's not going to we need to lynch or replace him"
2.I showed him where Romanus had posted at 2:15 the same day.
3.He asked why I quoted someone and voted him.
4.I asked him why he accused somebody of lurking.
5.He said he never did
6.I presented the evidence to him
7.He responded with post 123...

What do I win? Ice cream for the after party?

1. i didnt say we need to lynch him, i said if we're going to random lynch, lynching someone who doesnt post is as good a random vote as any.
2. my mistake
3. i didnt understand why you quoted someone else and then voted me. so you explained it, wheres the problem?
4-7. i guess i had a different understanding of lurking then you, how does that make me look scummy?

[Fircoal]

SV.

1.He said "Romanus needs to contribute, if he's not going to we need to lynch or replace him"
2.I showed him where Romanus had posted at 2:15 the same day.
3.He asked why I quoted someone and voted him.
4.I asked him why he accused somebody of lurking.
5.He said he never did
6.I presented the evidence to him
7.He responded with post 123...

What do I win? Ice cream for the after party?

1. i didnt say we need to lynch him, i said if we're going to random lynch, lynching someone who doesnt post is as good a random vote as any.
2. my mistake
3. i didnt understand why you quoted someone else and then voted me. so you explained it, wheres the problem?
4-7. i guess i had a different understanding of lurking then you, how does that make me look scummy?

Then what do you think lurking is?

[dcowboys055]

watching the thread without posting

[Fircoal]

watching the thread without posting

That's what it is, and aren't you doing that?

[dcowboys055]

watching the thread without posting

That's what it is, and aren't you doing that?

no....im posting

[Fircoal]

watching the thread without posting

That's what it is, and aren't you doing that?

no....im posting

BEFORE WHEN YOU WEREN'T POSTING!

[Mr Stoofer]

This is going nowhere.

And I don't think a claim is going to advance the debate. I won't criticise anyone for hammah-ing him now.

[Romanus]

I want a claim. But he is playing games.

If he posts two more times without even acknowledging that he is about to get lynched, without claiming, without putting up a defense whatsoever, I will hammah him.

[dcowboys055]

I want a claim. But he is playing games.

If he posts two more times without even acknowledging that he is about to get lynched, without claiming, without putting up a defense whatsoever, I will hammah him.

what?! without acknowledging im goign to be lynched? without putting up a defense?

i did both of those when i responded to what IH said his evidence against me was. look up.

[Romanus]

That's one

[dcowboys055]

two.

unvote stoofer

vote romanus

so tell me why are you voting for me? ive already answered IH's questions. you dont seem to have any, you're just pushing through a blind vote.

[Romanus]

I am not voting for you, not yet. But that seems like it will be changing very soon.

Do you even care that you are about to be lynched?

[spectrumvoid]

Seriously, dcowboy's latest posts have only served to make me more convinced he's scum.

[dcowboys055]

I am not voting for you, not yet. But that seems like it will be changing very soon.

Do you even care that you are about to be lynched?

of course i care. i havent heard one concrete piece of evidence against me though. IH had a few minor points that i responded to, besides that, there's been nothing.

[Romanus]

Oh, and did he OMGUS vote me? Why you want to go and do that for?

Claim please.

[dcowboys055]

this is bullshit....

ok im a cop,

unvote romanus

vote no lynch

might as well no lynch, since we now know who's dying tonight.

damn you pushy townies.

[Mr Stoofer]

And I don't think a claim is going to advance the debate.

QFT. This changes nothing.

I won't criticise anyone for hammah-ing him now.

[spectrumvoid]

Just a reminder: we have 2 cops this game.

dcowboy: did you breadcrumb?

[IH]

Lawl. He votes for a nolynch as an attempt to not get lynched?

==============[ ] IMO

[Mr Stoofer]

Lawl. He votes for a nolynch as an attempt to not get lynched?

==============[ ] IMO

QFT

.

I've seen many scum suggest no lynch when about to be hammah-ed. I've never seen a pro-town player do it.

[Mr Stoofer]

this is bullshit....

ok im a cop

You are right. It is bullshit.

[spectrumvoid]

I should clarify that I don't believe his claim, which is why I asked if he'd hinted at it.