Mafia 62: Suspicion in Sicily - Game over!

Ancalagon · Post Post #19 (isolation #0) » Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:11 pm

/confirmo

Ancalagon · Post Post #69 (isolation #1) » Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:13 am

Vote: Twito

Kuz he is scumm.

Ancalagon · Post Post #102 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:50 am

Any reason behind your vote? It seems that you're doing the same thing Cubsfan was doing...

Ancalagon · Post Post #105 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:53 am

Yep. That's exactly what I am doing. Same as Cubsfan. But hey. Day 1, gotta put pressure on someone, doesn't really matter who. I doubt we'll end up lynching Cubsfan today anyway, that's just a Day 1 wagon. Just tossing my little lump of coal into the engine.

To me, that's classic scum play. To others, it may not seem that way.

Anyways,

Unvote: Twito, Vote: TS

Ancalagon · Post Post #110 (isolation #4) » Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:38 am

can we just lynch mole?

he will likely not show up.

we can get info from the lynch.
save us messy debates.

Um... lynching mole will give us

no

info, at least about the living players, who we should be worrying about. And debates are good in mafia.

Ancalagon · Post Post #151 (isolation #5) » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:48 am

scott & hollywood, it's called getting a bandwagon going, duh.

Confirm vote: TS

Ancalagon · Post Post #207 (isolation #6) » Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:15 am

I agree. Raffles does seem a bit scummy, I'll have to look at a reread of the evidence, but TS is just playing horribly so far.

Ancalagon · Post Post #255 (isolation #7) » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:50 pm

Kudos to Alex.

Ancalagon · Post Post #269 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:43 am

I really don't see much of the evidence that DP is scum.

Present it to us, hollywoody.

Ancalagon · Post Post #275 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:33 am

Those posts weren't necessarily trying to draw attention to someone; he just stated his opinion. He wasn't talking in

BOLD AND ALL CAPS

or anything like that. I do agree that his voting patterns are odd, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is scum. A first or second vote doesn't really mean that much.

Ancalagon · Post Post #281 (isolation #10) » Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:36 am

I still don't see the real evidence for DP, but I'd like to hear from Yos as to why his vote is on hollywoody. To me it seems to be a bad town logic than scumlogic.

Ancalagon · Post Post #285 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 22, 2007 12:43 am

I still think TS is the way to go.

Ancalagon · Post Post #300 (isolation #12) » Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:44 pm

you're so damn cocky

Is that all you have to say?

Ancalagon · Post Post #360 (isolation #13) » Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:24 pm

Vote: TS

Like I did yesterday.

Ancalagon · Post Post #379 (isolation #14) » Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:34 am

Look at today's date, hollywoody.

Ancalagon · Post Post #402 (isolation #15) » Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:58 pm

Confirm Vote: TS

For twisting the facts, and trying to make EVERY SINGLE post of scot's seem scummy, which would be very unrealistic if every single post was scummy.

I do agree that scot isn't the least guilty player, but you are the most guilty.

Ancalagon · Post Post #404 (isolation #16) » Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:26 pm

Maybe reasons would be nice.

Ancalagon · Post Post #409 (isolation #17) » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:42 am

hollywoody1221 wrote:Scot, you couldn't have at least found an original argument to defend yourself? You laugh it off until Ancalagon comes to your rescue and delivers your defense himself. I'm still comfortable on TS, but I would echo the sentiments that you're definitely one of the more susceptible players.

QFT on the first sentence, but I didn't come to his rescue. I was showing how bad the argument was. As scotmany said, I'd like you to read TS's arguments and then look at the posts, especially about voting because of grammar reasons.

Ancalagon · Post Post #427 (isolation #18) » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:38 pm

That is probably a true statement.

I'm not sure what you're trying to convey, TS.

Ancalagon · Post Post #471 (isolation #19) » Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:24 am

So, tell me, who was the biggest suspicion? Or was there not much?

Ancalagon · Post Post #491 (isolation #20) » Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:13 am

I think it should be important who Jalyn defended and attacked. That should be our next discussion.

Ancalagon · Post Post #498 (isolation #21) » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:08 am

Raffles wrote:I would say I'm town but I don't think that'd get me far.

I know what you're trying to say, but something about the wording here just bothers me...

As Yos said, RA looks like the best choice.

Vote: Rand Althor

Ancalagon · Post Post #525 (isolation #22) » Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:24 pm

I really don't like lynching lurkers/inactives (hard to tell the difference) but it seems to be the best option right now.

Ancalagon · Post Post #540 (isolation #23) » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:18 pm

Raffles wrote:What unfinished games?

He's talking about referring to unfinished games to explain for inactivity.

Ancalagon · Post Post #543 (isolation #24) » Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:38 am

That was directed at N9V, right?

Ancalagon · Post Post #572 (isolation #25) » Sat May 05, 2007 6:22 am

Rand Althor:
Confirms, "random votes" himself, but I found this interesting:

RA wrote:he is so scum i'm sure of it.

Picture yourself saying this as a townie. I can't.

He then unvotes and promises to review the right then.

Four days pass.

Another interesting thing is this:

RA wrote:
Phoebus wrote:can we just lynch mole?

he will likely not show up.

we can get info from the lynch.
save us messy debates.
If he doesn't post he will get a replacement. If we do lynch him and he comes up town it's a wasted lynch. Personally I don't belive in LAL

Note: mole was Mafia.

He says that his "LAL" was Lynch All Lurkers.

He votes TS, and nine days later all he says is that he likes his vote on her.

Four days later, he votes kinkster because kinkster voted himself. (he did the same thing in the random voting stage)

After this, he makes sporadic posts about how inactive he was.

Vote: RA

I didn't see his scumminess till now.

Raffles to follow, maybe later tonight. I gotta work now.

Ancalagon · Post Post #598 (isolation #26) » Thu May 10, 2007 8:31 am

Can we just lynch RA? He hasn't responded to any of my arguments.

Raffles seems townie to me. I you want, I could do more analysis.

Ancalagon · Post Post #610 (isolation #27) » Sat May 12, 2007 4:26 am

RA is the best choice for today! Not cubsfan!

Ancalagon · Post Post #618 (isolation #28) » Mon May 14, 2007 8:22 am

Please everybody vote RA right now and rid the game of scum. Tomorrow we can lynch cubsfan.

Ancalagon · Post Post #620 (isolation #29) » Tue May 15, 2007 1:27 pm

I'll get mine on you done sometime. I had to quit mid-analysis.

Ancalagon · Post Post #628 (isolation #30) » Thu May 17, 2007 12:14 pm

Why is RA still alive?

Ancalagon · Post Post #632 (isolation #31) » Sat May 19, 2007 4:26 am

RA has yet to respond to my analysis. He needs to be lynched.

Ancalagon · Post Post #637 (isolation #32) » Sat May 19, 2007 7:35 am

Ancalagon wrote:Rand Althor:
Confirms, "random votes" himself, but I found this interesting:
RA wrote:he is so scum i'm sure of it.
Picture yourself saying this as a townie. I can't.

He then unvotes and promises to review the right then.

Four days pass.

Another interesting thing is this:
RA wrote:
Phoebus wrote:can we just lynch mole?

he will likely not show up.

we can get info from the lynch.
save us messy debates.
If he doesn't post he will get a replacement. If we do lynch him and he comes up town it's a wasted lynch. Personally I don't belive in LAL
Note: mole was Mafia.

He says that his "LAL" was Lynch All Lurkers.

He votes TS, and nine days later all he says is that he likes his vote on her.

Four days later, he votes kinkster because kinkster voted himself. (he did the same thing in the random voting stage)

After this, he makes sporadic posts about how inactive he was.

Vote: RA

I didn't see his scumminess till now.

Raffles to follow, maybe later tonight. I gotta work now.

Look at this analysis!

Ancalagon · Post Post #639 (isolation #33) » Sat May 19, 2007 8:57 am

Let's just find one of the two to keep a vote on. I say RA because of the reasons above. If everyone else switches to cubsfan, I will. Both should be lynched either today or tomorrow.

Ancalagon · Post Post #641 (isolation #34) » Sun May 20, 2007 4:10 am

Unvote, vote: cubsfan

Ancalagon · Post Post #643 (isolation #35) » Sun May 20, 2007 7:42 am

First of all, he posted, not responding to the arguments against him that were made since his last post, a possible Freudian slip. Second of all, since this makes no sense:

cubsfan wrote:That's a good point, it's a little late in the process to be lynching lurkers.

It seems way out of place, and trying to save himself, since he himself is lurker. Also, there is no "late in the process" part of lynching lurkers.
Third, because cubsfan, because of his last post, seems more deserving of a vote than RA. He seems a wee bit more scummy.
Lastly, he seems more likely to be lynched than RA, at least for today. I'll still want RA lynched tomorrow if he isn't lynched today.

Ancalagon · Post Post #645 (isolation #36) » Mon May 21, 2007 12:27 am

Who do

you

think is scum?

Ancalagon · Post Post #653 (isolation #37) » Thu May 24, 2007 12:10 pm