Mafia 62: Suspicion in Sicily - Game over!

[hollywoody1221]

I like the logic, and I see the connection. I'm going to

vote Alex

for right now, but what happened to Rand Althor? He was on the mafiascum site, he just didn't post anything during the entire day 2. Lurk much?

[Raffles]

Active lurker. When Mr. Flay sends his posts, he asks if we are actively lurking. Since he hasn't been replaced, there is a very good chance that he replied yes.

Vote: Rand Althor

[AlexPaoletti]

Jalyn = mole, if I remember rightly. It's probably just my gut, but I do sense cooperation whilst keeping enough distance from each other.

In the first quote, regarding whether or not people should mole, I was simply pointing out that it is not justified to vote him based on the fact that he has not showed up. I think we can all understand that we don't want to vote off a player for being

inactive

(keep in mind, that is separate from lurking). With, of course, the exception of putting votes on someone just to see how people react. I now have a bit more of an understanding about that concept, though I still say it'd be better to put the pressure on someone more suspicious instead of an inactive player.
As far as the second quote goes, I don't really understand how that is evidence against me. I was just pointing out fallacy in Jalyn's reasoning. As far as I can tell you, you picked out one vote where I defended mole and one where I disagreed with Jalyn and decided that it was "cooperation whilst keeping enough distance."

One of the most hardcore lurkers.

As far as me lurking, I did not have much to contribute. I was pretty sure that TS was scum, and when conversation switched from the TS/N9V group, I didn't really have much to say. I apologize for not doing as much as I should, and I'll try to be more active from this point on.

basically everyone he did attack turned out to be town.

This is a horrible argument. Everyone we voted turned out to be scum. It takes a majority vote to get lynch people. So really, the majority of people attacked someone who turned out to be town. Are you saying we're all mafia? Thinking someone is scum that wasn't does not make me scum; it means I misjudged.

Alex, tell me who you find scummy the most.

I don't know at this point. I was really sure TS was scum, lol. I'll go through the thread and come up with a name in a little bit.

[Raffles]

I like the logic, and I see the connection. I'm going to

vote Alex

for right now, but what happened to Rand Althor? He was on the mafiascum site, he just didn't post anything during the entire day 2. Lurk much?

I'm rather frightened by this post as I stated repeatedly that it was a gut feeling and there actually weren't any logic involved.

[AlexPaoletti]

I've looked through the thread and nothing is jumping out of me. If I had to decide on someone I find most scummy, I'd say either hollywoody, based on the point you (Raffles) just made, or Rand Althor, based on lurkiness. Not going to put any votes on though.

[Raffles]

Okay I'm going to have a restricted access starting immediate until 16th. I may or may not be able to post once a day. I hope you don't find a need to replace me.

[~N9V~]

Wow, worst night I think I have seen. I don't like the amount of lurkiness in this game.

[PJ.]

I'm to

Vote:Rand

because it might spur his activity in him because he is in 3 f my games I think and he is top of the LoS on all of them and hasn't commented.

[Rand Althor]

All of last week I was very busy with school. I hope to be omere active this week.

[hollywoody1221]

unvote Alex

b/c there are too many lurkers right now that will be clouding my thoughts on anything.

[Mr. Flay]

First Vote Count of Day Three:

Rand Althor - 2 (Raffles, Panzerjager)

AlexPaoletti - 1 (Yosarian2)

Not voting - 8 (spectrumvoid, Cubsfan4ever, scotmany12, Rand Althor, Ancalagon, AlexPaoletti, hollywoody1221, ~N9V~)

With eleven alive, six votes will lynch.

[Yosarian2]

unvote Alex

b/c there are too many lurkers right now that will be clouding my thoughts on anything.

So, there are too many lurkers and so you're not going to vote for anyone? How does that follow?

[spectrumvoid]

I'm back. I've gone through the thread, and I don't have anything to go on even though we're at day 3. I'll go look at our gunsmith's posts.

[hollywoody1221]

Easy, my suspicions are far ranging, as there were 3 killed last night, so I don't want to bandwagon someone if I'm unsure about them. That way, if by some freak occurence, four people decide to jump on the alex bandwagon, it wouldn't lynch him, as I would have unvoted, and would have had time to consider any actions to take. But lurking is different from not voting, as some of these people have just not shown up at all.

[spectrumvoid]

Vote Raffles[/b]

No explanation.

At the moment, Raffles is my prime choice, yes. I have no more info than what I posted. I did not like his post. It's called gut feeling - and you can hardly expect more this early in the game.

I need someone to refer me to a couple of DP's games to judge this gut thing. However, I must clarify that I don't think much of this at all.

[AlexPaoletti]

Which day was that quote? If it was Day 2, the unexplained vote may be DP having seen that he has a gun. We do need someone to investigate this gut thing. I've never played any other games with DP (this is my first game) so someone with experience with him might be able to help.

[Cubsfan4ever]

I wonder how three deaths occured. If there are two mafia groups and a SK we are pretty screwed.

[bigAl]

Hi, I'm posting this in various threads on behalf of scotmany12. He told me in chat that he is going on a short trip from now until midday Sunday, but since the site has been down, he won't be able to post this before he's leaving. He will most likely be out of communication range until Monday. Thanks.

[spectrumvoid]

I remember having a

vote: Raffles

partly to hear a response.

[Raffles]

What response do you want? I missed all the erased posts because I wasn't here.

[Mr. Flay]

Okay, the Google Cache is unhelpful for recovering our lost posts, so we'll just have to continue with what we have. "Luckily", discussion was fairly light over those few days, but I will prod those who have not posted in thread by this evening.

[Ancalagon]

So, tell me, who was the biggest suspicion? Or was there not much?

[Raffles]

Are you asking me?

[hollywoody1221]

So, did we lose posts that happened recently because of the server issues? or what is happening?

[PJ.]

I'm lost. We only lost a couple I believe.