klebian: 2 (VitaminR dahen)
VitaminR: 2 (Fritzler klebian)
Not voting: Glork petroleumjelly
With 6 on the bridge it will take 4 to lynch!
What? I said, the moment I pointed out that Ensign fits roleblocker, that I would expect Masterchief to have claimed it. I still believe that. It's not a question of never following it up.klebian wrote:Dahen, I look at where you say vitamin said an ensign fits rb. He never really follows this up, because he appears to believe that while rb fits, mc would've claimed this. This seems like a fairly weak attempt at distancing to me.
Glork + Dahen has been changed to pretty much impossible, because if that were the scumgroup, all Glork would have had to do was leave his vote on VitaminR, and Dahen could have walked up and hammered.Scum Pairings wrote:Klebian + VitaminR
Klebian + GlorkUnlikely
Klebian + DahenUnlikely
Klebian + Fritzler
VitaminR + Glork
VitaminR + Dahen
VitaminR + FritzlerUnlikely
Glork + DahenPretty much impossible
Glork + FritzlerPretty much impossible
Dahen + FritzlerUnlikely
Because if Dahen was scum with Klebian (hence making VitaminR town), he probably would have just lynched VitaminR by now and taken his chances. The willingness to lynch Klebian, and the fact that I haven't found Dahen to be too scummy are also factors. Of course, the fact that he tried to get me to vote for VitaminR myself was a black mark against him. Signs of eagerness in the face of a possible LyLo situation is something I don't particularly like.Glork wrote:PJ, could you explain why Kleb/Dahen is unlikely in your eyes? I think I'm missing something. Is it Dahen's willingness to lynch Klebian, or is it something else?
That's what I said (or meant, meh). Because you think he would've claimed rb, you believe masterchief wasn't a roleblocker. However, dahen took that post where you said that ensign makes sense as a roleblocker, and apparently didn't read the rest of it, because he used that post and interpreted it asVitaminR wrote:What? I said, the moment I pointed out that Ensign fits roleblocker, that I would expect Masterchief to have claimed it. I still believe that. It's not a question of never following it up.klebian wrote:Dahen, I look at where you say vitamin said an ensign fits rb. He never really follows this up, because he appears to believe that while rb fits, mc would've claimed this. This seems like a fairly weak attempt at distancing to me.
I disagree, I see it as you saying that while rb does make sense, you don't think he was rb and are thus pro-glork, and that one statement where you say that ensign + rb makes sense was weak distancing if anything; definitely not making you quite anti-glork and trying to get a wagon started.VitR is thereby quite anti-Glork. I think he here tries to get a new wagon to start on Glork.
When did I do that? Do you mean my question if you would hammer him? That was an attempt to sound like I was giving up with my Klebian preference. I hoped it would make you think twice an extra round about lynching VitaminR. You did list him as the last person you wanted lynched, but if you take away the Glork+Fritzler combo by the reasoning you just did, then he in fact is the common denominator between Klebian+VitR and Klebian+Fritzler.PJ wrote: Of course, the fact that he tried to get me to vote for VitaminR myself was a black mark against him.