Mini 416 - AM Mafia - Game Over D:

[Thestatusquo]

*_*_*_* Vote Count - 6:18:01 AM *_*_*_*

"Sleeping is no mean art: for its sake one must stay awake all day." ~Friedrich Nietzsche

PBuG -4- (Panzerjager, Jingolaw, Elias_The_Thief, Capt_Fantastic)

Panzerjager -1- (PBuG)
Not voting -3- ( CoG888, Fircoal, Thestatusquo)

With 8 alive, it takes

5

to lynch.

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

I find it way harder to believe that there would be no vanilla in a game, jingalo, and I find that comment on your part to be scummy as hell.

[Elias_the_thief]

I dont buy the claim, based on the flavour of the game. It seems that everything would have some sort of role in waking/keeping asleep joe.

[PJ.]

I don't buy either.

[PJ.]

Does anyone else like or dislike the claim?

[Thestatusquo]

I kind of find it hard to believe that there would be no vanillas in the game. That doesn't make me believe it, or disbelieve it. It does make me want to take a close look at Jingalo, as he seems to have forgotten this is a normal game (or forgotten it on purpose.)

I'm still undecided on the claim itself. I think I'm leaning towards believing it.

[Fircoal]

I think the claim is real, also I haven't found anything that scummy in Pbug.

I vote because of the possibility of successfully lynching scum.

Even if they look like they aren't going to be lynched but they are the scummiest why not vote for them? that sounds scummy to me. IF you don't vote for who is scummy, how can we lynch scum?

Fos: Jingolaw

[TBuG]

Um, we have three dead townies.

[CoG888]

pbug: was that directed at the "no vanillas" comment?

[TBuG]

pbug: was that directed at the "no vanillas" comment?

Yes, it was.

[PJ.]

I like the

FoS:Jingolaw

idea cause that whole post was scumtastical

[CoG888]

Jingolaw is far scummier then anyone else to me right now.

Vote: Jingolaw

[PJ.]

Yeah, when even the convoluted PBuG say you are scummy when you are actually acting scummy that says something,

Unvote.Vote:Jingolaw

[Elias_the_thief]

I still feel that pbugs actions thus far are scummier then that post. He hammered someone just to try to prove that he wasnt their scumbuddy.

[TBuG]

I still feel that pbugs actions thus far are scummier then that post. He hammered someone just to try to prove that he wasnt their scumbuddy.

I suspected him, too. Sefer's logic made sense.

Unvote; vote: Jingolaw

[Elias_the_thief]

I never attacked their logic. The post was scummy. But I feel that your play this game overall is much more worthy of a lynch.

[TBuG]

Okay, I'll give you that, I've played like shit and SHOULD have been lynched already.

[Thestatusquo]

Nice appeal to emotion.

[TBuG]

Nice appeal to emotion.

What? It's true. Regardless of my alignment, my play is horrendous.

[PJ.]

I second that motion.

[CoG888]

Jingolaw, I think you should claim now.

[PJ.]

Mod:

Vote Count please.

[Jingolaw]

I admit that positing that there were no “vanilla” roles seemed odd. I think that I was mistaking the obvious “flavor” of roles with powers. Given everyone’s “flavor,” I think it’s an easy mistake to have made.

...as he seems to have forgotten this is a normal game (or forgotten it on purpose.)

That’s pretty much it; I did, in fact forget that this was a “normal” game. Think about it: there was a one-shot vig, a one-shot blanket immunity, and at least one hint that powers change or evolve from day to day...that’s not “

normal

.” When PBuG claimed vanilla townie, it struck me as odd, particularly when I was already very suspicious.

Even if they look like they aren't going to be lynched but they are the scummiest why not vote for them? that sounds scummy to me. IF you don't vote for who is scummy, how can we lynch scum?

I think you’re misinterpreting what was asserted. If you reread the whole paragraph, I think you’ll see that my position matches yours. I was defending against CoG’s argument that I seemed scummy because I placed a vote on a player who would almost certainly not be lynched. I defended, arguing that I place my vote on someone who I think is scum, regardless of whether I think that player will, in fact, be lynched. I think we’re on the same page on this, Fircoal.

Jingolaw is far scummier then anyone else to me right now.

Because I don’t buy PBuG’s claim? I’m “far” scummier? Please. You’re looking worse every post. Not, of course, nearly as bad as PBuG, so I won’t knee-jerk a vote for you, CoG, because that would be...you know...

scummy

.

Although I probably deserve the FOS, Cog and Panzer were awfully quick to vote...almost as if they were working together. (PBuG’s vote is understandable)

I have maintained my position that PbuG is anti-town since I got here, providing the best evidence I could. The exact nature of PbuG’s claim leaves me more convinced. My vote stays.

Okay, I'll give you that, I've played like shit and SHOULD have been lynched already.

QFT.

[CoG888]

I think you are "far scummier" because of your posts from earlier in this game, not from whether you believe pbug's claim or not. Elias and panzer don't buy it either, yet I have pro-town opinions of them.

I was not quick to vote. I suspected you two pages ago at the start of this day. You became aggressively defensive towards me, and that reaction is why I voted for you. You are one of two SK possibilities in my opinion, and unlike my other suspect, I think you will turn up scum if you are not the SK.

[Thestatusquo]

TBH I do not like the cog-pbug-jingalo interraction at all. I think there is at least 1 scum in that group, and I find it very likely that there's 2.

[Jingolaw]

TBH I do not like the cog-pbug-jingalo interraction at all. I think there is at least 1 scum in that group, and I find it very likely that there's 2.

Believe it or not, I’m leaning that way, too. If PBuG comes up SK, I’ll be less sure, but if he comes up scum, I’m increasingly convinced that CoG is scum, too. CoG’s doing way too much PBuG-defending...much more than PBuG, himself, actually. CoG’s also way too anxious for a claim.

I’m still not sure about Panzer: he looked scummy, then looked pro-town for a while. Now?...scummy again.