In post 1235, mastin2 wrote:(As always, if I get enough people requesting his full role PM, I will post it, even though it is fairly self-explanatory.)
Mod I would like his full role PM
.
<<< I will require the majority of living players making this request--be it publicly or privately--in order to reveal the PM. >>>
Last edited by mastin2 on Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm not dealing with Giant-Baby-Mollie for the rest of the game.
I am not the 1 who is being a giant baby as in I am no the 1 running around saying town is doing a terrible job on d3 when 1 of the lynches were on scum. so you want me lynched cos you have decided you don't like me? lol
@ mastina - count me in for bulba's role pm altho guessing by your reaction it won't be all that informative. plz post it anyway tia.
<<< Got it.
Also, remember that this is for
Bulbazak's
role PM. If you want to see Voided's, that's a separate request that needs to be made. >>>
Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.
"Metadiving DGB is like playing Roblox" - T3
"She's sort of like a quantum computer, her reads exist in multiple states at once. u have to take into account the other dimensions." - Morning Tweet
i would say the game is easily breakable by mass claim and that hawk is just being stupid and playing suboptiomaly if hes town thinking that he has every answer
In post 1615, ProHawk wrote:I dont have every answer, I am saying you don't and thinking you do is your downfall.
me being a player who not only knows how to break setups but also creates them. i think i have enough knowledge to know when a set is broken and when its not.
but your right i dont have every answer, but that doesnt stop me from trying and shouldnt stop others from trying either. that approach you think is "correct" is wrong though i can say that much with jsut the current claims
broke setup and abused the roles to make it impossible for scums to win
------
and your talking to a guy who almost always goes for: day 1 mass claim, done this offsite (massclaim and coridnate roles), makes thes very types of setups, and knows that an imbalanced game practicly calls for mass claim
look at our flips already scums lost a lawyer/talior, tell me why we should not be claiming when its obvious its multi-cop game
I think in absence of Fenix fullclaiming, which isn't really necessary since he's an investigative and we can just tell him who to look at, it's ika's and mollie's turn to claim to the extent they desire.
Your turn, ika.
"I just want to play mafia, not Economics Wonderland." - cytheflyguy
In post 1620, ProHawk wrote:Looks like that first game wasn't a closed setup, am I wrong?
thats besides the point?
In post 1621, Mathdino wrote:I think in absence of Fenix fullclaiming, which isn't really necessary since he's an investigative and we can just tell him who to look at, it's ika's and mollie's turn to claim to the extent they desire.
Your turn, ika.
i want to stall it out to piss off everyone now (looks at hawk/eddie)
i want eddie to give out his results on who he checked (although i bet i know)