ok.. falcone
his second post in the game comes at #55:
Hand banana, why did you suspect khelvaster in post 36? Also, why the sudden change of heart about Nekka (posts 45 vs 48 & 50)?
i didn't like this part about nekka. i just explained why i removed my vote. it seemed to me as subtle scum strategy to make 2 townies fight each other. but it's all very vague.
Also, he claims to have found at least one scum (post 90) or even three scum (post 99), but he didn't give any reasons.
these are simply lies..
id didn't like his style here at all. i think he just picked up on nekka's mistake and he's trying to exaggerate arguments against me. and then he starts making them up.
then, after 5 pages, and only few of his posts..
- The point about playing just enough not to be called a lurker is stupid. You can't determine whether someone is a lurker just by looking at their post count. You also have to take into account the amount of actual content in their posts. I'll usually make one or two posts each day, and try to comment on as many issues as possible in those posts.
that content being:
-asked a couple of questions.
-made up something about me.
-said panzer is not suspicious at all.
that's all.
--
and then this:
Remember, being town doesn't mean you're going to decide correctly. Also, we can't actually be sure you're protown. Giving a possible scum a free nightkill of his choice would be terribly stupid.
when i asked about "what free nightkill" and pointed out that scum already
has a nightkill, he answered:
"That's why giving them an extra free nightkill would be disastrous."
i really didn't understand this, and it puzzled me for a very long time.
if i was scum, i wouldn't get an "extra free kill" by just a mere belief from town that i'm vig. and this came after i claimed. so he's making stuff up again, and subtly implying that i should be lynched.
then again, he sais he will be back with content on other players, but he disappears for couple of pages only to return with more false accussations for me:
It seems like the possibility of not using your ability tonight, which is the correct play, hasn't even crossed your mind.
it did. i said that at least couple of times.
then this:
The right way to play your role is not to claim unless absolutely necessary (as with most power roles) and not to kill unless you're extremely sure of someone being scum (for example: X claims cop, Y counterclaims, town lynches X who turns out to be the real cop, at night you kill Y).
yeah right.. the right way to play vig is not to claim, and to pick random players and kill them as he wishes. and all this with "Y" player. how the hell would he survive the day, and not get lynched if he claimed cop, and we have a dead cop??
By the way, don't you see how many people are disagreeing with your plan?
only 3. and 2 of them were my main suspects.
--
later he voted khelv and that's our current discussion.
so here are my conclusions:
he was very causcious with other players from the beginning. he made a couple of mistakes and contradictions only when he came after me. he never attacked anyone, but me, and jumped on khlev's bandwagon with reasons (in post 247) that don't seem believable to me at least.
-if khelv turns out to be scum, i think we should clear tar. falcone might be still scum, but he thinks khel is lost cause, and he just gives a couple of mild accusations. so, what i concluded right now is that khel's guit has nothing to do with falcone's.. if falcone is scum, that doesn't mean khel is innocent. and i would not like to see khel lyched before i see two of the in a discussion (khel and falcone).
right now i reconsidered everything i've read so far and:
falcone is scum 80%
khel is scum 55%
tonight.. you!
). 2 things wrong with his fight...
