First my defence. Here's a compliation of every argument against myself I've found presented:
Xdaamno, I don't like that you only commented on the section of our newcomer's analysis related to you. That's rather defensive, no?
As I've already said, you'll see I'm overdefensive in all of my games. It screws me over a lot, I admit. Anyway, if I didn't want to comment on it to much, what do you think the section that's most relevant to me? Yes, my own. You could of argued I was ignoring my own defence if I did anybody else's.
I think the point is Xdaamno, that my gut tells me you are scum.
I'll represent all of the gut feelings with this post, and obviously there's not much I can defend this with. I can say, however, that I attract this kind of argument in almost all my games (I don't know why (And by brackets like the past one I get a bad gut feeling off
myself
-_-')). Anyway, if you singularily want to lynch me for that, I suggest you really should look for a bit more evidence, because otherwise it's kind of unfair since I can't defend myself against gut much.
Vote Xdaamno Tomorrow, schismatized. Schismatized seems to basically be defending any point or argument Xdaamno makes, and tries to dissuade us from legitimately going after Xdaamno. For a first day lynch, I think we can't do much better than Xdaamno.
I asked mlaker wouldn't that make sch the best lynch, and he hasn't replied. I'll stand by the fact that somebody defending me only is a scum tell on yours truly if the person defending me is also scum. It's ridiculous to lynch people based on them being connected, for all you know we could be masons (Though I admit we aren't >.<).
I'll try to get that reread on daaamno done, but I'm not sure if I can, as I'm pressed for time as it is
Please try, IH.
In the early stages of finger pointing, Xdaamno just seemed to be an entity posting from outside all the action. Also he has given the escape route of "pressure vote" with most of the votes he has made.
That's one way of interpreting it, Inhim; that I'm scum observing the game. The other is that I'm town observing the game. While my behaviour is admittedly
consistent
with scum play, it dosen't nessecarily mean I
am
scum.
While it's in my mind, some people have asked me about Fletcher. As much as I also believe you may be pro-town, pirate guy, I disagree in that Fletcher's scum; most of his arguments are solid from my POV (Including the early ones against me).
IH wrote:Xdaamno wrote:Xdaamo wrote:
We defintaly need to decide on a lynch. I'm fine with IH (I've seen his play like this as scum before) and Yoghurt.
So.... why did my name come up? Curious is all, as this is the first time you mentioned me in a while.
I only just realised, after reading another of your games, that you often play similar to you are doing now, as scum. Then again, I haven't yet seen you as town. I guess saying I'd be fine with you for a lynch was going too far, though. Dunno what I was thinking (Once again, gut feeling for myself, anybody thinking that too? And, yes, pointing it out and not deleting it is more beneficial since you know what i'm thinking and I don't trip over myself).
I don't like 207, Xdaamno just sounds like he want's to please the town's opinions, not find scum. In other word's he doesn't take the initiative to do them, he wants them on request.
I don't like how everyone suddenly wanted Xdaamo to give analysis's.....
My defence to this is that I guess a lot of people would have had lots of self-centered pots such as mine, and you might have taken it out of context. If not, apologies for getting you wrong and I'm just not focused.
About your second paragraph, I just though my connections to others might be useful, somehow. The more information you (we) all have, the better.
IH wrote:Xdaamno wrote:Xdaamno wrote:
It's a very deep psychological reason; mafia often make an attempt to refer to themselves in third person rather than refer to themselves naturally, and so use the term 'mafia' more often.
Of course, this is dependant on the 'base heart rate' of how often they say the word 'scum' anyway.
I call BS. That's like claiming vanilla instead of townie indicates you're scum, but it truly truly doesn't. It just sounds like a crap reason to cast suspicion on someone.
If you want to disagree, fine, but I believe it and you can't pin me for that (And your example's kind of different. Not many people actually refer to them as 'the mafia', from my experience, apart from scum. I could be wrong, but I believe it anyway).
).
