Signs and Void (Game Over) [TM2015]

fferyllt · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:19 pm

GiF, talk to me about your reads.

Zar · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:20 pm

In post 222, Tammy wrote:Zar - are you and your team. Mates talking about this game?

Yes, they've been reading and giving me thoughts

Tammy · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:20 pm

Feel free to hurry up and make up something they said!

Zar · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:27 pm

Why would I need to make up stuff?

(Empire thinks reading your angry posts is funny).

Tammy · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:27 pm

Because you're not actually discussing the game.

Empire can kiss my ass.

DeasVail · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:28 pm

In post 220, ActionDan wrote:Did you ever say why you thought UT was scum? (I also suppose this is an independent read from Ceph.)

Shadoweh wrote:It's really simple, protection doesn't work very accurately. It's better to have less effective protection that gives information then it is to have more effective protection that might not do anything at all.

And mine

I don't like UT's interactions with you nor do I like 41, which seems to be an attempt to be all pro-town and attack TSO for not thinking that there is some super great importance between choosing 1 and 2. I agree in that the choice probably does matter, but I can easily see town being indifferent to it, and the whole post is made even weirder by the fact that there's no real evidence that UT put a lot of thought into his choice. I guess I'm biased in that I still see Choice 2 as quite clearly inferior, but in my opinion if you're going to pick Choice 2 and then attack others for being indifferent to the Choice, you better have a good explanation!

This read did come before Ceph read the game, but he independently didn't like UT's abrasiveness and felt it was unnecessary. And while I think UT is the best bane choice, Ceph would be voting for Cheetory if he was in the game (and can confirm Ffery that Advance Wars is what Ceph was talking about in our PT).

Tammy · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:29 pm

I mean I totally get no matter what empire is going to trash me in your pt, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

Tammy · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:31 pm

I think it'd be a little more productive to discuss my view point, but hey that's just me.

fferyllt · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:31 pm

Yeah I"m not fond of UT atm either.

I want to leave a strong townbloc behind when I drop dead. I'm thinking about how to go about that.

Zar who is Empire townreading?

hitogoroshi · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:32 pm

VC 9 (Minor Day 1, VC 9)

Bane:

Target player's Sign is revealed.

(2)

Gammagooey:

ActionDan, vezokpiraka [L-8]
(2)

ChannelDelibird:

Cheetory6, Titus [L-8]
(2)

Titus:

ChannelDelibird, T S O
(1)

No Bane:

GuyInFreezer
(1)

Shadoweh:

Tammy
(1)

GuyInFreezer:

Marquis
(1)

Cheetory6:

Bulbazak
(1)

Untrod Tripod:

DeasVail
(1)

Mastin2:

Shadoweh
(1)

Marquis:

Gammagooey

(6)

No Bane Vote:

Antihero, Aronis, Espeonage, Mastin2, Untrod Tripod, Zar

Choice:

Should protection stop

one

kill, but inform players when a kill on them was prevented; or

two

kills, without this information?

(8)

One:

ChannelDelibird, ActionDan, vezokpiraka, GuyInFreezer, Marquis, DeasVail, Shadoweh, Titus [L-2]
(4)

Two:

Gammagooey, Untrod Tripod, Cheetory6, T S O

(7)

No Choice Vote:

Antihero, Aronis, Bulbazak, Espeonage, Mastin2, Tammy, Zar

With 19 votes in play, it takes 10 to Bane or Choose. Deadline is Sunday, April 5th at 9 PM CST.

Minor Day One Deadline(expired on 2015-04-05 21:00:00)

Antihero is V/LA until March 31st.

Zar · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:33 pm

In post 231, Tammy wrote:I mean I totally get no matter what empire is going to trash me in your pt, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

Well, could you explain your claim out of the blue? Would that be more relevant?

Marquis · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:34 pm

I have decided that the nonstop use of exclamation points is making it hard for even me to think what I'm saying isn't sarcastic, overblown bullshit! But clearly my last post actually was bullshit because I put this game off right afterwards and only skimmed the last page or so right now!

Time to Do Something!

Tammy · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:36 pm

In post 235, Zar wrote:
In post 231, Tammy wrote:I mean I totally get no matter what empire is going to trash me in your pt, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

Well, could you explain your claim out of the blue? Would that be more relevant?

I'm sorry did you ask me a question? I don't remember dodging a question you asked.

I, do, remember having a conversation you skipped over to let me know that I'm getting trashed in your pt when I asked you if you were discussing the game.

Titus · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:37 pm

In post 204, Shadoweh wrote:
In post 167, Titus wrote:Given how townsided most of the open setups can be, I bet practically no one preferred scum.

This isn't an open setup. Also I'm pretty sure you're wrong and treating at least this Fake Day 1 NotLynch like we're playing Choose Your Side will be productive. I was more asking what kind of towny town advice you were getting from your buddies, are they giving you reads?

oh my gawsh tammy thinks town is silver she must be scum! II am referring to the kind of awkward jokey way you opened up in that game, compared to how you've opened up this game pretty laissaire faire. LLD thinks you're scummy too. I think you're more likely to have spent townie tokens though.

Sorry.

Generally, they told me to be more laissezfaire, don't sweat the small stuff, and try to avoid tunnelling. Definately no game domination day 1. If the group is going to be suboptimal, let them do it rather than fighting and distracting if you said your piece.

Marquis · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:38 pm

In post 141, DeasVail wrote:I skimmed over this before, but would like to say that I very much enjoyed you as a player in our last game and while you are free to play in whichever way you like, your usual incessant talking and "shitposting" is cool too!

Thank you, DeasVail! I enjoyed your play that game as well; it was minimally offensive, which made sense with you being SK in the end! I hope we can continue to buddy each other in this game without having to worry about you trying to pull the same tricks again!

Zar · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:38 pm

In post 233, fferyllt wrote:Yeah I"m not fond of UT atm either.

I want to leave a strong townbloc behind when I drop dead. I'm thinking about how to go about that.

Zar who is Empire townreading?

Empire is townreading Cheetory and ActionDan by way of actually posting.

Tammy · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:38 pm

Also, nice deflection noted zar.

Tammy · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:39 pm

In post 240, Zar wrote:
In post 233, fferyllt wrote:Yeah I"m not fond of UT atm either.

I want to leave a strong townbloc behind when I drop dead. I'm thinking about how to go about that.

Zar who is Empire townreading?

Empire is townreading Cheetory and ActionDan by way of actually posting.

As opposed to his magic eight ball?

Tammy · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:40 pm

Zar · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:40 pm

In post 237, Tammy wrote:
In post 235, Zar wrote:
In post 231, Tammy wrote:I mean I totally get no matter what empire is going to trash me in your pt, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

Well, could you explain your claim out of the blue? Would that be more relevant?

I'm sorry did you ask me a question? I don't remember dodging a question you asked.

I, do, remember having a conversation you skipped over to let me know that I'm getting trashed in your pt when I asked you if you were discussing the game.

But Mina really wants that explanation and it's part of her comments in the discussion we actually have that you think we don't!

Zar · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:41 pm

In post 241, Tammy wrote:Also, nice deflection noted zar.

Titus · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:41 pm

In post 233, fferyllt wrote:Yeah I"m not fond of UT atm either.

I want to leave a strong townbloc behind when I drop dead. I'm thinking about how to go about that.

Zar who is Empire townreading?

My best games tend to be those where I form a townblock first and then push scumreads rather than the other way around.

So I will try to help, but not so sure hoe effective I will be.

I do think TSO is town. He's scumreading me because he cannot understand my posts. So start there maybe.

Tammy · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:41 pm

bane: zar

Marquis · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:42 pm

In post 149, Cheetory6 wrote:
Deas wrote:Cheetory, can you please explain your current opinions on Tammy and Marquis?
Haven't really seen enough from Marquis's first four posts to form much of an opinion on him, but I don't think him 'shitposting' during earlygame D1 seems out of character for him based on my experience with him.

What are you talking about!? I don't remember how many games we've had together but even if you've had at least one with me, you would know that I'm always tempted to shitpost as either alignment! Even so, that's besides the point, because I specifically mentioned I wasn't going to excessively shitpost this game anyway! But please let me know if it ever gets out of control and I will either stop it or ramp up the intensity depending on my current feelings toward you!

Tammy · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:42 pm

In post 244, Zar wrote:
In post 237, Tammy wrote:
In post 235, Zar wrote:
In post 231, Tammy wrote:I mean I totally get no matter what empire is going to trash me in your pt, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

Well, could you explain your claim out of the blue? Would that be more relevant?

I'm sorry did you ask me a question? I don't remember dodging a question you asked.

I, do, remember having a conversation you skipped over to let me know that I'm getting trashed in your pt when I asked you if you were discussing the game.

But Mina really wants that explanation and it's part of her comments in the discussion we actually have that you think we don't!

WHAT EXPLANATION?

I have no idea what you're asking me to explain.