New York 181 -- Game Over

Titus · Post Post #3500 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:04 am

@AP, I'll wait on reading SW by meta until all games I am modding with her or subbed in are ended.

@ika, *scratch* I'm confused. You're asking me what I'd do then telling me to not do what I'd do. Being last scum/SK in a playerbase this size depends on not ticking people off unless forced due to meta.

Titus · Post Post #3501 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:05 am

That being said, ika you should post your town list.

Oh and Pisskop is not mafia, maybe SK. The push on Klingon was too big for mafia.

ika · Post Post #3502 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:08 am

In post 3500, Titus wrote:@AP, I'll wait on reading SW by meta until all games I am modding with her or subbed in are ended.

@ika, *scratch* I'm confused. You're asking me what I'd do then telling me to not do what I'd do. Being last scum/SK in a playerbase this size depends on not ticking people off unless forced due to meta.

let me try it like this:

Spoiler: alive players

from this list, you are required to name someone and justify why you would kill them. your answer of "ehh i kill who ssuepcts me" is not what im lookign for im lookign for "i would kill X b/c XYZ"

and honestly if we follow your logic of you kill who suspects you, it would mean you are most probable sk

A Royal Saint · Post Post #3503 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:10 am

Myself
Angry Pidgeon
AP
ika
Titus
Texcat /end town block

pisskop · Post Post #3504 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:12 am

Why are we making arbitrary townblocs? bad. I don't amind them but when everybody forces them into discussion it becomes an issue. It only takes one scum/sk to ruin the bloc, which would collaspe into a fustercluck if it doesnt yield results anyway.

ika · Post Post #3505 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:14 am

In post 3504, pisskop wrote:Why are we making arbitrary townblocs? bad. I don't amind them but when everybody forces them into discussion it becomes an issue. It only takes one scum/sk to ruin the bloc, which would collaspe into a fustercluck if it doesnt yield results anyway.

you realize we can revaulate it as it goes on?

i do agree on that being a flaw but in hindsight if we can form a universla townblock, the scums will more or less ahve to start killing those overlaps or rick being caught if they are there or being POED

pisskop · Post Post #3506 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:16 am

Fun idea: We have X numbers of days. Who would we lynch (-/+1 player) to win?
. I don't like the idea of actively discussing making a bloc, because TBs are supposed to be natural and just sort of happen without the players within them verbally consenting to it.

In this closed setup we
a) dont know for sure if the bloc is actually sufficient
b) dont know if the SK is being made into it (probably the biggest threat to town if this happens. SK riding the days out? 'Contribuiting' to the townblocs agenda?)
c) wifom: scum/sk can always get into it
d) its trying to break the game, which honestly is kind of unfun.

pisskop · Post Post #3507 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:17 am

derp: this isnt closed setup. Scratch a)

pisskop · Post Post #3508 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:17 am

Too many work

Titus · Post Post #3509 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:21 am

@ika, ABR never really suspected me at all. He just voted me on policy. I'm not required to do shit. I don't decide kills in advance. However, to avoid just absolutely dodging your question, I'll add something to it. Provided night ended right now, I'd probably kill Anen or Shiro because both are off the wall kills and would get people pointing at each other and not me.

@Pisskop, explain the +1/-1 idea please?

pisskop · Post Post #3510 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:22 am

Dah.

In a closed setup you need to be able to adjust a plan.

ika · Post Post #3511 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:23 am

but we arent makign them entirly artibary?

like we are no just bringing the idea up to use it

@titus, maybe not "required" to, but putting you on the spot for a quesiotn makes it easier to find out your thoughts

Flubbernugget · Post Post #3512 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:37 am

In post 3460, Titus wrote:#3248

First flubber you assume that a player in the game wouldn't be familiar with it. Why would I need to provide a summary of a game to a player...when they just finished it?

Why are you so focused on AP refuting a case that has not even fully materialized in my head?

Why, if you haven't done a meta dive, do you assume any case would be refutable?

VOTE: Egg

I never asked for a case. Just a summary of the game. If you misrepped AP's play in any way to scumpaint him, why wouldn't he refute it? If AP doesn't refute your summary of the game, what reason would I have to not trust it?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #3513 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:43 am

I don't see why you are all up in arms about the townblock when its really just reads bouncing off each other right now, lol.

texcat · Post Post #3514 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:07 pm

How do you plan on keeping the SK out of the townblock? Most of the suggestions I've seen contain some likely candidates for SK.

texcat · Post Post #3515 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:09 pm

In post 3503, A Royal Saint wrote:Myself
Angry Pidgeon
AP
ika
Titus
Texcat /end town block

Are Angry Pidgeon and AP two separate players???? I've been reading the references to AP, as AngryPidgeon.

Titus · Post Post #3516 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:13 pm

In post 3515, texcat wrote:
In post 3503, A Royal Saint wrote:Myself
Angry Pidgeon
AP
ika
Titus
Texcat /end town block

Are Angry Pidgeon and AP two separate players???? I've been reading the references to AP, as AngryPidgeon.

It's an ARS derp most likely.

Titus · Post Post #3517 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:14 pm

In post 3514, texcat wrote:How do you plan on keeping the SK out of the townblock? Most of the suggestions I've seen contain some likely candidates for SK.

Don't really need to if the townblock just excludes one or the other, and is large enough it's fine.

A Royal Saint · Post Post #3518 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:26 pm

In post 3516, Titus wrote:
In post 3515, texcat wrote:
In post 3503, A Royal Saint wrote:Myself
Angry Pidgeon
AP
ika
Titus
Texcat /end town block

Are Angry Pidgeon and AP two separate players???? I've been reading the references to AP, as AngryPidgeon.

It's an ARS derp most likely.

Actually that was a derp but I meant ABR there. :$

4nxi3ty · Post Post #3519 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:33 pm

Shiro - 4 - Albert B. Rampage, dragonspawn, dramonic, pisskop

dragonspawn - 2 - AngryPidgeon, Aneninen

A Royal Saint - 1 - texcat
AngryPidgeon - 1 - Flubbernugget
dramonic - 1 - Egg
Flubbernugget - 1 - Titus

Not Voting: ika, A Royal Saint, Shiro, DeltaWave

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline: (expired on 2015-04-23 22:05:49)

V/LA: Shiro, through Wednesday, April 15; pisskop, til April 5; Egg, til April 12

pisskop · Post Post #3520 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:44 pm

Im not a fan of us getting obcessed with a townbloc when we have a largely naked wagon. Discuss this thing.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #3521 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:46 pm

In post 3520, pisskop wrote:Im not a fan of us getting obcessed with a townbloc when we have a largely naked wagon. Discuss this thing.

UNVOTE: ;VOTE: Shiro

Discussion began.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #3522 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:18 pm

In post 3518, A Royal Saint wrote:
In post 3516, Titus wrote:
In post 3515, texcat wrote:
In post 3503, A Royal Saint wrote:Myself
Angry Pidgeon
AP
ika
Titus
Texcat /end town block

Are Angry Pidgeon and AP two separate players???? I've been reading the references to AP, as AngryPidgeon.

It's an ARS derp most likely.

Actually that was a derp but I meant ABR there. :$

and you want abr in a townbloc because....

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #3523 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:19 pm

^ good question. But you are voting town so shove off

Titus · Post Post #3524 (ISO) » Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:22 pm

VOTE: Shiro

Shiro's possible scum so I'm ok with this.

Would prefer Dragon though.