Mini 485: Formula One (Game Over)

[ChaosOmega]

FOS: discordian algorithm

SPAG is a scummy

active player I would like to see at -1 to lynch.

Emphasis mine. You want an active player at L-1 this early? I agree that he's suspicious, but he's talking, he's giving us information, there's no reason to lynch him yet. Also, talking about alts, other active games he's in, I agree that you're seeming to be distracting. Speaking of which, FOS: SPAG. I would just think you're a newb, but you said you had prior experience. In which case, you're acting very suspicious. Frequent vote hopping, agreeing with others right behind them, attempting to look town. I'd vote for either of you, but it would put either of you at L-2.

[discordian algorithm]

Mod: please give us a votecount

CO: I would be happy to see him lynched now. I wanted pressure on him, and everything since then has been hella scummy. I think I have a good tell against pulsewidth. pulsewidth should follow him to the noose tomorrow.

Has anyone observed the following pattern in other games: and significant bandwagon forms on a player, and quickly another wagon forms on a second player. In

your

experience which wagon is more likely to hold scum.

On a side note, for a game this size, I think a 15 page day one is better than a 30 page day one.

[JDodge]

Vote Count:

SPAG - 4 (discordian algorithm, SirWario, IH, deadscilent)
discordian algorithm - 4 (Zindaras, pulsewidth, SPAG, Paradoxombie)
deadscilent - 2 (Polter, KaleiÐoscøpe)
Sir Wario - 1 (ChaosOmega)
ChaosOmega - 1 (ojpower)

Not voting (0): No one

7 to lynch.

Sir Wario has informed me that he will be away from Thursday-Sunday.

[discordian algorithm]

Pop quiz: can you name the lurkers from the above list?

[deadscilent]

That comment was uncalled for.....

My FOS towards Discordian is just growing more and more.

[discordian algorithm]

Well

can

you?

[SPAG]

Disco, my games that i have completed elsewhere are on a private football site, where we have a mafia game section. We play very differently.

I am not prepared to give everyone my password just so you can 'prove a point'. Not that there is one and i'm finding this all rather tedious.

[Paradoxombie]

DA reminds me of ABR.

But anyway, we have two candidates here, atm:

SPAG
Votes several players rapidly with little conviction, easily bends to the whim of town
or
Discordian Algorithm
Votes one person consistantly with much conviction, tries to convince the town that she's right.

Pretty much polar opposites. But, I don't really see any reason to lynch either.

Unvote: Discordian Algorithm

[SPAG]

Unvote Disco

As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think Disco is mafia. I think she is just town trying too hard to prove a theory. It really does make me worry that she wants me at -1 though

[pulsewidth]

DA, the reason a wagon formed on you is because of your own statements. What do you think is gonna happen when you come right out and say you want someone at lynch -1? That's automatically going to look scummier than mostly anything else someone has said in only 3 or 4 pages. When you added in the reference to ongoing games, that was what spurred me to put a vote on you.

You followed up all of this with repeated insistence on references to outside games, which I maintain is a crutch and a bad way to scumhunt. It looked like a distraction to me. I first had a read on you as being very eager newbscum. Now with a re-read (and taking into account of the alt-reveal), you just come off as an overly aggressive townie who is seeing scum everywhere and using bad methods of finding them. Yes, bad methods. I still maintain that relying on info outside of the game is not a good way to put a scum argument on someone. But if you think otherwise, good luck to ya.

As far as the scumbuddy accusation, I will always point out when someone is trying to bus somebody and using, IMO, crap methods to do it. If you are going to convince the town that someone is scum, you're going to have to do better.

Unvote: discordian algorithm

FoS: discordian algorithm

[pulsewidth]

EBWOP: Geez, DA. Maybe your methods work better than I thought. 3 posts in a row all with an unvote on you?! Note to self: Be really intimidating and make threats of lynchings; result - people will jump off your wagon very quickly!

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

DA, are you planning to use selfdestruct or something? You are already asking for a lynch on page 4?

[SPAG]

Kaleidoscope - why have you condemned lurking when you have done exactly that? You've offered nothing so far.

[ChaosOmega]

He didn't comdemn lurking. Now you're just putting words in his mouth.

unvote, vote SPAG

That puts him at L-2.

[SPAG]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Damn lurkers...

Vote: ojpower

[/quote]

And also his vote on Deadscilent for not posting.

[pulsewidth]

........


Those were all votes in the random voting stage. Are you freaking serious? I've seen enough. Someone lynch this guy already.

Vote: SPAG

[SPAG]

He did say 'damn lurkers' did he not? and he has been lurking.

[SPAG]

bah, im now at -1.

[pulsewidth]

No, lurking is what ojpower and porter have been doing. Speaking of which, JDodge, have prods been sent out to those two?

[SPAG]

Well its lurking in my book. Posted 4 times, contributed nothing.

[SPAG]

Well as i'm at -1, i think it is wise to character claim.

I am Jensen Button.

[ojpower]

unvote, vote SPAG

[Paradoxombie]

**** went down.

[pulsewidth]

ojpower coming out of lurking and bringing the hammer with nary a word is very telling.

I'll stop talking now. Twilight and all that.

[discordian algorithm]

3.) When a player reaches a majority of votes, they are lynched. I will reveal their role, and the game will move into the night phase. Players can still talk during "twilight".