In post 1751, Garmr wrote:It's simple dragonspawn lied ronit has pointed that out, Dragonspawn has connections with dave, When you combine dragonspawns defensiveness with the fact he was acting dumb = a scum point,Dragonspawn could try to say anything against my case to disprove it instead he said "it was a whole lot of nothing" with out touching on the points.
We have so many points on dragonspawn it's not funny. Also ronit seems to be entirely new to mafia so it wouldn't surprise me he would out himself in such a manner.
Firebringer wrote:ronit behavior is scummy and we lynch all liars in my town!
VOTE: Ronit
FA_Q2 wrote: In post 1745, Shazam wrote:Well I don't think scum would have claimed like that and then retracted and come up with such a reasonable defense for why they made the claim. I actually believe ronit.
VOTE: SCtH
Reasonable defense my ass.
There is nothing that would make sense in that 'test' as a townie. Why would your reaction have been different if you were scum? If he is town and scum seen an opening they would take it. His reasoning is garbage. The retraction is because it bought him an instant 3 votes and he had to do something or die. Fortunately for us townies, he did something that makes no sense whatsoever and then used BS 'reasoning' to say that you were in the clear. I would have chalked it up to random flailing by dying scum but you tried to pass this off as reasonable. It is highly likely that you are one of his partners.
I'm pretty sure one of you is scum at this point. It is rather obvious to me that scum has less reason to do what ronit did than town does.
1) FA_Q2, in fact, states the reason why the test works, then says it proves the test DIDN'T work. If I was scum, I would see an opening and take it. This is actually not what I did, since I at first did not see the claim as scummy. After FA_Q2 mentioned dragonspawn's meta, I was much more inclined to believe that ronit was scum. So the test did work.
2)The fact that he is new to mafia could just as easily be a reason why he would set up a stupid test as town if you think the test is stupid.
3)He was not just about to be lynched, and admitting a lie does not seem like something scum would do.
Could I be wrong about all of this? Sure, but I think my reasoning is sound. And why the heck would scum make a test in which he lied, then admitted the lie and said that it showed HIS SCUMPARTNER WAS TOWN, and then why would his scumpartner then DECLARE HIM TOWN IN RETURN? That is a much dumber assertion than any ronit has made. FA_Q2, you're either town who has taken leave of his senses, or scum.