In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
:(
In post 1776, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1774, talah wrote:I still don't think AJ's scum.
FAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFA
In post 1778, Vedith wrote:In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
I'm a he.
In post 1780, talah wrote:In post 1776, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1774, talah wrote:I still don't think AJ's scum.
FAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFA
Haven't learned to translate "FAFA" yet
In post 1779, talah wrote:In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
πρωκτό σας είναι γλυκιά μου , και τα γούστα του μελιού
In post 1777, Aj The Epic wrote:Skybird trying to lynch Worst is stupid, though. Neither FN should be targets since they both say they can resend.
In post 1784, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1779, talah wrote:In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
:(
πρωκτό σας είναι γλυκιά μου , και τα γούστα του μελιού
What the fuck
In post 1782, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1780, talah wrote:In post 1776, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1774, talah wrote:I still don't think AJ's scum.
FAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFA
Haven't learned to translate "FAFA" yet
No.
Vote FA.
In post 1787, talah wrote:In post 1782, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1780, talah wrote:In post 1776, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1774, talah wrote:I still don't think AJ's scum.
FAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFA
Haven't learned to translate "FAFA" yet
No.
Vote FA.
Erm no he just claimed kill-preventing role.
Are you going along with IaI's suggestion or why/why not?
In post 1786, talah wrote:In post 1784, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1779, talah wrote:In post 1775, Salamence20 wrote:In post 1753, talah wrote:Not claiming anything in greek today Vedith?
Δεν νομίζω ότι αυτή προκηρύξεις
πρωκτό σας είναι γλυκιά μου , και τα γούστα του μελιού
What the fuck
I was having a private moment with anuses. I'm sorry I can't think of the actual plural.
Also I like honey it's nice.
In post 1745, talah wrote:In post 1743, Titus wrote:
@FAQ2, that's what I have heard before and I am not lynching the neighbor but a recipient of the message.
Dunno know how this works for you. Scum/Town receive the message they both have to acknowledge it. If scum don't receive a message and say they did then -obviously- the supposed sender and receiver are both scum given that both sender and receiver agree that a message was sent.
I think I see how this works on a "simply odds" type basis for you. The receiver is scum in 2 of the permutations out of 3
Sender receiver
Town town
Town scum
Scum townexcept for mod lies which I don't think are in normals
Scum scum
But in the situation you're talking about where you're suspicious that VeGee fucked up a receive, then only scum/scum applies. Then you need to ask yourself how choof came about a claim which pre-empted an identical claim.
The only trollscum scenario I can see this working in is multiball where the second scumteam of AJ/Worst rolecopped the first scumteam of choof(Skybird)/Veegee and decided to face off.
We don't have enough information to infer that and I'm not a pro when it comes to scum-strats but I think that'd be a bad idea even if it was true.
In post 1791, Titus wrote:
Town town setup is impossible unless worst and aj are both scum as Vegee says the message has the town redundancy or a town lied about the message or the mod made an error.
In post 1794, Aj The Epic wrote:I think titus is comparing Vee/Me
In post 1796, talah wrote:My problem is ruling town/town out in any scenario.
Already said Titus should actually be analysing the initial Skybird (aka choof) claim if she thinks there's something wrong there.
In post 1797, Titus wrote:Second, Skybird cannot be guilty unless VeeGee also is guilty.
In post 1798, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 1797, Titus wrote:Second, Skybird cannot be guilty unless VeeGee also is guilty.
Yes but veegee scum does not necessitate Skybird scum