Mini 485: Formula One (Game Over)

Xdaamno · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:50 am

Hey, SW, calm down. I was just pointing out what I noticed at first glance, and you sprung to mind.

SW wrote: This is blatant joking. Come on, it's the first freaking page!

I know, I pointed that out myself. It's just the type of joke that raised my eyebrow; the fact that you were 'in that frame of mind'.

Xdaamno · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:52 am

Also, Roach, that SW attack looked pretty weak. You're just saying he's a townie or a scum, while trying to incriminate him. Plus what do you mean 'Bide your time'? I'd prefer it if you helped to lynch scum a little, rather than just throw accusations about the place.

I'm reading the rest of the game now, but I did check back to make sure Roach hadn't provided any strong arguments.

Roach · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:00 am

Xdaamno wrote:Also, Roach, that SW attack looked pretty weak. You're just saying he's a townie or a scum, while trying to incriminate him. Plus what do you mean 'Bide your time'? I'd prefer it if you helped to lynch scum a little, rather than just throw accusations about the place.

I'm reading the rest of the game now, but I did check back to make sure Roach hadn't provided any strong arguments.

Well...

I'm trying to wait and see who is scum, since I didn't have a chance D2.

Right now I'm leaning towards a SW lynch because he is forcing me to talk.

SirWario · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:00 am

Roach, are you trying to say that you haven't finished reading and you don't plan to? You're just gonna wait how to see how day 3 plays out and decide from that? If you haven't re-read, I strongly advise you to do so very soon.

Xdaamno · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:28 am

Hah! I have the feeling the removal of SirWario's avatar is designed to make him stand out less

Xdaamno · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:36 am

Double Post: Roach and pulsewidth are also on my scumdar due to ill-timed posting or arguments I disagree (Rather general, I know, but they're both high on my list). Since it's rather hard for a replacement to grasp the timing and priority of arguments if you aren't actually

in

them, IMO, is there anything I need to respond it?

ChaosOmega · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:39 am

vote: Roach

You might as well be saying "I'm not going to help you guys because I wasn't here, and I'm not going to bother to reread."

You're trying to wait and see? There's 12 whole pages of posts for you to look through and form some opinions.

SirWario · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:45 am

Thank you, Chaos. Roach is making it look like its absurd to want some participation. Xdaamno's been here for like a day and he already has contributed more than you.

IH · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:52 pm

bah everybody die = (

Zindaras · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:46 pm

Roach wrote:Since I haven't been caught up and I'm against all forms of metagaming (whatever that is), I'll just bide my time and watch for developments for D3, meaning:

Great. Let's do nothing and wait for the scum to come to us!

FoS: Roach

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:43 pm

Whoops, forgot about this. I'll reread what I missed soon.

In the meantime,

Vote: DA

.

Xdaamno · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:50 am

Not liking Kaleidoscope's return upon being suspected, and unexplained vote, TBH.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:01 am

Your post insinuates a) that me lurking might be better and b) that I've not explained my DA vote before, which I did. Both are wrong, and a is terribly scummy, which makes me think your scum who rather left me inactive for an easy lynch target.

Xdaamno · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:03 am

You think I conspired to attack the player who was inactive, looking for reasons directly (and therefore baselessly), hoping to get five or six people on my side and lynch a player who wasn't even there?

Ocham's Razor dictates that post was probably OMGUS.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:15 am

I'm simply saying what kind of feeling your post gives me. Do with it what you like.

Xdaamno · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:14 am

Yes, I can see how you could say that if you were a townie, but it dosen't really prove anything to me. It's just a pretty flimsy coincidence that the one person calling me scum is one of the people I was attacking; I'd more expect you to call me 'wrong' or something.

Polter · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:11 am

Roach wrote:Well...

FoS
SirWario for forcing me to talk.

Now:

Since I haven't been caught up and I'm against all forms of metagaming (whatever that is), I'll just bide my time and watch for developments for D3, meaning:

FoS's

Votes

Unvotes

WIFOM's

ETC.
.

SirWario, you pushing me to talk has caused me to believe that you are either:

A) A townie who is desperate to lynch scum

OR

B) A scumbag who is trying to find out his(/her) next NK target.

I'd like to agree. This is the first time I've been around to look at this in a while. I've already told the moderator that I was busy moving, so that's why I was "lurking", as SirWario so kindly put it. So much for me being inactive for a week or two, eh? I say something, I get pressure put on me. I don't say anything, I get pressure put on me. Get over yourself, buddy.

SirWario · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:25 am

I meant lurking in the begining of the game, not during day 2.

Zindaras · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:51 am

JDodge wrote:
Xdaamno replaces Polter
.

I

really

want Roach to post analysis.

Roach · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:03 pm

Zindaras wrote:
JDodge wrote:
Xdaamno replaces Polter
.
I
really
want Roach to post analysis.

Fine. Here's your [expletive deleted] analysis:

-SW: Either some sort of vote-milling maniac or a scumbag. Jumpy. Puts pressure on me. Not the kind of guy I want watching my back.

-Zindaras: Either a scummy kitty or a paranoid one. Gives off town-tells (though not many). Could either be really clever scum or a vote-milling kitty. Leaning more towards B.

-SSF: No info so far. Will post later in detail.

-Xdaamno: No info so far. Will post more in detail.

-ChaosOmega: Definite scum. Will lynch later when able to.

ChaosOmega · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:42 pm

Definite scum? But I do have to agree with your very convincing argument.[/sarcasm]

You were also suspicious of SirWario, with your main reason being:

Roach wrote:Right now I'm leaning towards a SW lynch because he is forcing me to talk.

What? You find it suspicious to want people who are under suspicion to speak? Also, all of the people you are suspicious of have posted saying they want input from you. Coincidence?

SirWario · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:34 pm

What the hell is vote-milling?

Roach · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:58 am

SirWario wrote:What the hell is vote-milling?

'vote-milling' = forcing people to vote.

SirWario · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:09 am

Oh, ok, but I don't think that fits me. I wanted more discussion and I thought some analysis from you might expedite it.

Your [expletive deleted] analysis is quite vague though. You basically say me and Zindaras could be scum or town. A few you say not enough info. Finally chaos as obvious scum, but no explanation. If he's definite scum, why not vote him now?

Does anyone have any theories on why IH didn't get off any nightkills?

Roach · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:13 am

SirWario wrote:Oh, ok, but I don't think that fits me. I wanted more discussion and I thought some analysis from you might expedite it.

Your [expletive deleted] analysis is quite vague though. You basically say me and Zindaras could be scum or town. A few you say not enough info. Finally chaos as obvious scum, but no explanation. If he's definite scum, why not vote him now?

Does anyone have any theories on why IH didn't get off any nightkills?

Well, my analysis was vague because I couldn't keep up with you guys, and I'm relying on this day (plus D4) to further it. If you just wanted discussion from me, all you had to do was ask instead of forcing me (which I think you're doing).