On massclaim: not today but I wouldn't mind doing it D2 or D3. I've gone over the possible roles in the wiki and did some research. I encourage others to follow the game links at the bottom of the
wiki page for this setup as well. The best way to handle claims in this setup is to use a tiered claiming system. If you look at the
setup determination section, you'll see that some roles can't exist without other roles existing first. I'll call those Tier 2 roles while the ones that can exist without needing any other role to exist are Tier 1 roles. During massclaim, we start off with people claiming either VT, T1, or T2 popcorn-style. For reference T1 is 1-shot cop, cop, doctor, 1-shot vigilante, vigilante, roleblocker. T2 is 1-shot doctor, Mason, 1-shot roleblocker. When all players have tier claimed, massclaim should start with the T2 ones popcorning between themselves first and then the T1 players doing the same. That way, if for instance someone claims 1-shot doc, and there is no doc, they are confirmed scum. This makes fake-claiming a lot harder for scum.
Oh? Tell us why. The people voting Titus at that time were Blockyman who put down an RVS vote, me who hadn't explained my vote yet, and EspeciallyTheLies who also didn't explain her vote. What about those votes makes Titus town?
Why do you feel the need to post this in response to Firebringer's vote on you? This strikes me as you being too nervous about the votes on you.
In post 94, Persivul wrote:I'm not saying it's suspicious that you're pushing for it at this point...but how would it benefit us?
Why are you going out of your way to tell Titus that you don't suspect her instead of directly asking the question?
In post 129, Ranger wrote:Overall, pretty confident in {BlockyMan, Firebringer, Marge, EspeciallyTheLies}. I'd be extremely surprised to see a scum outside these names.
Is this a serious post? For you to be extremely surprised to see a scum outside these names, you need to be townreading everyone else. I want to see you explain those reads. For instance, the only think I had posted was to vote Titus and push that lynch which is similar to what EspeciallyTheLies had posted so why does she make your scumlist as opposed to me?
In post 273, Kop wrote:Does anybody not find it strange that Blocky has been at L-1 for a while now, and nobody has posted intent or even hammered him. Does this spell an indication that scum are on his wagon?
Is there a reason you are suggestively putting this forward? No one posting intent on Blockman could mean several things including that he's scum and his partners don't want to bus and all the townies that would vote him have already done so.
Can you explain your read on Marge in a way that shows me the scum motivation behind her posts as opposed to how you felt upon eating those posts? You aren't reviewing restaurants on yelp. "Icky" and "yucky" doesn't cut it for me.
In post 285, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:um.. this is a fast-paced game on a slow-paced forum, on the first actual day of posting, over Halloween weekend.... This is the laziest bullshit I've ever read. I also don't like the appeal to fear and poo-pooing of the wagon on Blocky without any real reasoning. It's like, "everyone on the wagon is scummy for being on the wagon, not because the person they are voting is towny or anything, but just because they are voting someone." It's pretty bad.
Ranger made a lazy post where she listed out four players and said she was confident that scum were in there. Why is Ranger a townread for you while Persivul through similar logic of lazy posting is a scumread?
Why didn't Kop's post register for you where he made assumptions about the Blocky wagon?
In post 323, Kop wrote:Persivul. You say what you said about my post towards Blocks wagon, blocks wagon was formed on probably the littlest thing and it ran up. You soft defending it, could be a case you know he is town, and you know he's going to flip that, you get town credit because you were the one who defended it, if Block is hammered.
Isn't that exactly what you are doing?
In post 389, Ranger wrote:Well to put it bluntly, I think you're scum pushing him, and in the engagement between you two, he comes out on top. I don't think your points hold water, I think his posting looks town, so I will not be voting him.
Scum whiteknighting detected. Persivul didn't "hold his own" in his argument with EspeciallyTheLies. He floundered around and was unable to come up with solid explanations for his stance on the Blocky wagon. Only problem is, I'm not sure if he's scum or just a bad player horrible at articulating his thoughts. Your posts on the other hand look like you are trying to defend Persivul in part for towncred and in part to buddy him as he seems more susceptible than EspeciallyTheLies.
UNVOTE: Titus
VOTE: Ranger
Kop is a good vote as well. Titus's defense of Persivul also looks like whiteknighting so the scumread there hasn't gone away. Blockyman could be scum but I want to see what the replacement does.
