Blitz 1: C9++ (GAME OVER!)
-
-
Rob14 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6219
- Joined: October 5, 2012
-
-
OceanWind Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: July 16, 2015
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:We start with 497 The case on Ranger is a straw grasp. And it'shidden within a bunch of other questions so you can't really see it.
I read this a couple of times to make sure I didn't miss some hidden meaning. I'll assume you started off with a joke as an opening act to lift people's spirits and make them laugh because despite how much I attacked your comprehension ability, I don't think you intended to be serious here.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:It starts with challenging runner's scum reads, saying he has to be town reading everyone he isn't scum reading (duh??). This is poe. Nothing to be suspicious of
I don't find Ranger suspicious for using POE. I find her suspicious because as early as Post 129, she audaciously declared that she would be "extremely surprised" to see scum outside of four names that she listed - on page 6. That looked like scum putting up a false bravado front because she was nervous, similar to a first-time speaker prepping themselves before a speech.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:How does one white knight someone when you don't know their alignment? I was never fond of etl's push against persuvial, and although persuival's posting wasn't as elegant as etl's, his points made sense to me. The only towncred Ranger got from defending persuvial is the transparency of their read, and ocean blew the defence way out proportion.
Your first sentence doesn't make any sense. Whiteknighting is when scum defend a townie under suspicion. The objectives range from 1. looking town upon their flip, 2. gaining their favor by buddying them and being their only ally, 3. preventing their lynch so as to take them deep into the game as an easy mislynch. When scum whiteknight a townie, it looks unnatural because they don't have good reasons for townreading said townie and do it purely for strategic gain. Ranger's defense of Persivul smelled like bullshit and her being too sure of Persivul and complimenting his arguments against EspeciallyTheLies looked like the kind of certainty scum have when they know that a townie is town.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:Look at 617 we see that Ocean thinks persuvial could be town, and we saw etl's aggressive push against persuvial. Again, not only is the white knighting thing blown way out of proportion, it is done so under the fact that in ocean's eye's a potential mislynch was within reach.
What you just posted is incoherent. Yes, I at that point had a townread on Persivul and yes EspeciallyTheLies was aggressively pushing Persivul. Ranger at that point attacked EspeciallyTheLies rather than Persivul which if Ranger is scum serves the purpose of making EspeciallyTheLies look even more scummy upon Persivul's lynch and townflip while she Ranger gets credit for "calling" Persivul as town before he flipped. If the lynch failed, she'd have Persivul on her side because she was his only ally; the one he could count on. "Blowing it out of proportion" is a clearly not a scumtell. For example, you are blowing my suspicion on Ranger out of proportion and I assume you think you are town. We as town emphasize our reads and hammer down our points because we feel that they are worthy of consideration.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:622 I point this out as an addition to my case and get told I'm moving the goal posts.
You first claimed that I should be voting Persivul and that I was sheeping EspeciallyTheLies's case and you scumread me for that reason. I told you I was not sheeping, nor was I scumreading Persivul. When your misunderstanding was brought to your attention, you pretending like it didn't exist and pulled a new reason out of your ass without even acknowledging my response. Your new reason (619 makes even less sense than your old one because the old one could be a case of genuine misunderstanding. The new one just looked like you trying to save face. Of course scum whiteknight townies that are being pushed if they think it is useful to them so I don't see what your point is.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:His push against titus saying prohawk wasn't scumhunting was blah now that I'm looking at it again
Titus was not talking sense. I still have no idea how a town played could play the way she did.
In post 1363, Flubbernugget wrote:All it takes is a naked vote for the ate to kick in. Town ate tends to be at everyone. This ate is directed at an individual player
Also let's not forget that titus was a counterwagon to a rising wagon on ocean
ATE means "appeal to emotion." I haven't appealed to anyone's emotion. I think you may be mis-referring to my frustration with the game as "ATE." I was frustrated with Titus because Titus could not be reasoned with. She incessantly called me scum without bothering to address my points or engage me. Whenever I try to reason with her, she ignored me and a few minutes later, she called for my lynch. Such arrogant behavior has no place in mafia games and is frustrating to deal with. I wasn't frustrated with everyone because everyone wasn't playing like Titus. Only Titus played like Titus. I've seen just as many cases of two counterwagons being town with scum sitting back as I have with town and scum counterwagons. This point (lol, counterwagon) is bad and lazy. Don't be bad and lazy.-
-
OceanWind Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: July 16, 2015
In post 1374, Titus wrote:Vote Count #2.3:
OceanWind:EspeciallyTheLies, Flubbernugget (2)
Ranger:OceanWind, Kraeg (2)
EspeciallyTheLies:Ranger, Ythan (2)
Ythan:Marge, Firebringer, ProHawk (3)
Firebringer:Persivul (1)
Not Voting:Kop,
With 11 people alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
V/LA:Kop until Sunday morning.
Deadline:(expired on 2015-11-09 22:47:00)
I don't like the Ythan wagon. Ranger isn't going anywhere. I'd like to try and see if we can consolidate on Firebringer. Doesn't hurt that one of my few townreads is pushing there.
UNVOTE: Ranger
VOTE: Firebringer-
-
Firebringer Trail Blazer
- Trail Blazer
- Trail Blazer
- Posts: 53410
- Joined: June 28, 2015
- Location: woofbringer
lol, you are going for two mislynches in a row?
Bold move scum, bold move.Show"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
-
-
Persivul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10042
- Joined: May 4, 2015
In post 1367, Flubbernugget wrote:Hey guys are you bored of the game or do you just post less on weekends
That's something that we should probably talk to zor about postgame
I had to pick up my sister at the airport and run her around yesterday. Today I'm going to the Steelers-Raiders game and that will eat up most of the day. But IMO the game's moving reasonably well.
Your 1363 on ocean was underwhelming, and his 1376 was a good response. Who else could you vote today?-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1222, Ranger wrote:
This seems absolutely backwards. If you're a serial killer and you claim vig, then you can shoot every night. If you claim one-shot vig and you continue to shoot, then you're outing yourself as a liar.Ythan wrote:If it's a regular vig claim sure you can keep watching them but 1 shot vig is like the easiest/laziest sk fakeclaim in this setup.
In theory, I can see where Ythan is coming from, because claiming a regular vig, it couldn't hold strong credit than a 1 shot because if you think further into it, she could shoot the first night, then stop killing after that and just help people towards a lynch, and if she isn't nightkilled or lynched, she rides that claim to the bank.
Claiming a regular vig, people might start to think, and they might just figure it out that she isn't exactly the vig we are thinking of.
And the other thing you have to think about, is by claiming regular vig, mafia will want that out of the game because they are a threat, so a SK claiming vig just basically kills them off, but by claiming one shot, she takes that shot then doesn't do anymore after that, so in theory mafia, don't see her as a threat anymore because in effect, they see the SK as a VT.
But obviously she flipped town, and I was on that wagon. My vote was naked but I was pretty much convinced that she was the SK from reading the posts in this thread. I don't like the idea of trading, I have seen it many a time where they offer themselves up to the town in order to be kept alive, and it just didn't benefit the town whatsoever. If I believe your genuinely scum, we don't trade, I'd rather the rope around your neck, simply because we let you live one night, you do what we tell you, but then muddy the water to break connections with partners.
ETL, I'm not sure what game you are playing, but if your town, you don't offer yourself up for a lynch, regardless of what suspicion you have. Come on, defend yourself, prove you are town, get the suspicion of you, and play to your win con and find scum. If you feel you can't bypass your suspicion and want to be lynched, I suggest you replace out, because by lynching you, you flip town, you are helping scum, more than helping your win con in winning as town.You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1208, Ranger wrote:
Easy: by having scum on the wagon. Lots of scum. Maybe even three.Flubbernugget wrote:Fucking yikes how do you claim vig un cc'd and still get wagoned that fucking hard
I'm dead serious, I'd vote to lynch any of the members of that Titus wagon.
In related posting: my scumread on Firebringer has vanished. With the defense of Titus, I don't see scum defending her in that manner.
How do you not see scum defending her in that manner?You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:I am intrigued at the argument of Titus SK but I don't really want to lynch her oddly enough.
VOTE: kop
Can we lynch this instead?
During the wagon of Titus, you tried to get a wagon formed on me, with no basis or arguement to show for that vote. And ever since the flip, you haven't followed it through. Obviously for you to wanting to lynch me, you obviously have a scum read on me, you have YET to engage myself, asked any questions, or even followed it through.
What was the whole basis of your vote being on me during that wagon on Titus?You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 1377, OceanWind wrote:In post 1374, Titus wrote:Vote Count #2.3:
OceanWind:EspeciallyTheLies, Flubbernugget (2)
Ranger:OceanWind, Kraeg (2)
EspeciallyTheLies:Ranger, Ythan (2)
Ythan:Marge, Firebringer, ProHawk (3)
Firebringer:Persivul (1)
Not Voting:Kop,
With 11 people alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
V/LA:Kop until Sunday morning.
Deadline:(expired on 2015-11-09 22:47:00)
I don't like the Ythan wagon. Ranger isn't going anywhere. I'd like to try and see if we can consolidate on Firebringer. Doesn't hurt that one of my few townreads is pushing there.
UNVOTE: Ranger
VOTE: Firebringer
Why don't you like the wagon?-
-
EspeciallyTheLies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13245
- Joined: February 9, 2013
-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 1380, Kraeg wrote:With regards to ETL, I don't like the "lynch me" mentality. It doesn't make sense. If you're really pro-town, why would you even get yourself lynched on purpose, and give another mislynch for the town. That's definitely a bad thing to do.
People don't think that way.
It's really null because you either have players who really do get fed up or scum that fake the emotion.
In post 1385, Kop wrote:In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:I am intrigued at the argument of Titus SK but I don't really want to lynch her oddly enough.
VOTE: kop
Can we lynch this instead?
During the wagon of Titus, you tried to get a wagon formed on me, with no basis or arguement to show for that vote. And ever since the flip, you haven't followed it through. Obviously for you to wanting to lynch me, you obviously have a scum read on me, you have YET to engage myself, asked any questions, or even followed it through.
What was the whole basis of your vote being on me during that wagon on Titus?
I made points why your vote was scummy.
-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1388, Marge wrote:In post 1380, Kraeg wrote:With regards to ETL, I don't like the "lynch me" mentality. It doesn't make sense. If you're really pro-town, why would you even get yourself lynched on purpose, and give another mislynch for the town. That's definitely a bad thing to do.
People don't think that way.
It's really null because you either have players who really do get fed up or scum that fake the emotion.
In post 1385, Kop wrote:In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:I am intrigued at the argument of Titus SK but I don't really want to lynch her oddly enough.
VOTE: kop
Can we lynch this instead?
During the wagon of Titus, you tried to get a wagon formed on me, with no basis or arguement to show for that vote. And ever since the flip, you haven't followed it through. Obviously for you to wanting to lynch me, you obviously have a scum read on me, you have YET to engage myself, asked any questions, or even followed it through.
What was the whole basis of your vote being on me during that wagon on Titus?
I made points why your vote was scummy.
You made your points, Prohawk didn't. That's what I am trying to work out, I understand people making points for there votes, but when they don't when trying to start a wagon, I find it baffling.
I didn't put any of my points forward when I voted for Titus, but the points had already been put forward by others, and I did put my opinion forward, before I placed my vote.You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1389, Kop wrote:In post 1388, Marge wrote:In post 1380, Kraeg wrote:With regards to ETL, I don't like the "lynch me" mentality. It doesn't make sense. If you're really pro-town, why would you even get yourself lynched on purpose, and give another mislynch for the town. That's definitely a bad thing to do.
People don't think that way.
It's really null because you either have players who really do get fed up or scum that fake the emotion.
In post 1385, Kop wrote:In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:I am intrigued at the argument of Titus SK but I don't really want to lynch her oddly enough.
VOTE: kop
Can we lynch this instead?
During the wagon of Titus, you tried to get a wagon formed on me, with no basis or arguement to show for that vote. And ever since the flip, you haven't followed it through. Obviously for you to wanting to lynch me, you obviously have a scum read on me, you have YET to engage myself, asked any questions, or even followed it through.
What was the whole basis of your vote being on me during that wagon on Titus?
I made points why your vote was scummy.
You made your points, Prohawk didn't. That's what I am trying to work out, I understand people making points for there votes, but when they don't when trying to start a wagon, I find it baffling.
I didn't put any of my points forward when I voted for Titus, but the points had already been put forward by others, and I did put my opinion forward, before I placed my vote.
Actually looking back at my posts, it wasn't a strong opinion, but it was just the basis of the trade that Titus proposed, I don't like trades, I think the whole situation would still be there on day two, and wouldn't have been resolved. That element of suspicion would still be there, and would distract us.You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
ProHawk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6211
- Joined: July 26, 2012
-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
Firebringer Trail Blazer
- Trail Blazer
- Trail Blazer
- Posts: 53410
- Joined: June 28, 2015
- Location: woofbringer
Nice vote.Show"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown-
-
EspeciallyTheLies Survivor
-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1394, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:this is terrible.
What's your objection? Put out your points anyone can say this is terrible.You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Kop Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: December 24, 2013
In post 1395, Kop wrote:In post 1394, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:this is terrible.
What's your objection? Put out your points, anyone can say this is terrible.
Missed out the comma in between points and anyone.
I'd rather someone put out points about why it's terrible other than saying it's terrible. It doesn't really convince me that it is indeed that, it's lazy way of objecting to a wagon than having to prove to why it is that.
@persuvial what is your facts of your vote on Firebringer?You'll Never Walk Alone!-
-
Marge Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 365
- Joined: October 18, 2015
- Location: Springfield
In post 1390, Kop wrote:In post 1389, Kop wrote:In post 1388, Marge wrote:In post 1380, Kraeg wrote:With regards to ETL, I don't like the "lynch me" mentality. It doesn't make sense. If you're really pro-town, why would you even get yourself lynched on purpose, and give another mislynch for the town. That's definitely a bad thing to do.
People don't think that way.
It's really null because you either have players who really do get fed up or scum that fake the emotion.
In post 1385, Kop wrote:In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:I am intrigued at the argument of Titus SK but I don't really want to lynch her oddly enough.
VOTE: kop
Can we lynch this instead?
During the wagon of Titus, you tried to get a wagon formed on me, with no basis or arguement to show for that vote. And ever since the flip, you haven't followed it through. Obviously for you to wanting to lynch me, you obviously have a scum read on me, you have YET to engage myself, asked any questions, or even followed it through.
What was the whole basis of your vote being on me during that wagon on Titus?
I made points why your vote was scummy.
You made your points, Prohawk didn't. That's what I am trying to work out, I understand people making points for there votes, but when they don't when trying to start a wagon, I find it baffling.
I didn't put any of my points forward when I voted for Titus, but the points had already been put forward by others, and I did put my opinion forward, before I placed my vote.
Actually looking back at my posts, it wasn't a strong opinion, but it was just the basis of the trade that Titus proposed, I don't like trades, I think the whole situation would still be there on day two, and wouldn't have been resolved. That element of suspicion would still be there, and would distract us.
None of this explains why it was scummy just something you disagree with.-
-
EspeciallyTheLies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13245
- Joined: February 9, 2013
ocean is grandstanding. flooding the thread with nonsense walls. suddenly there's a phantom wagon on firebringer out of nowhere. that's fuckin suspicious. and ocean just happily switches from ranger, who is supposedly the scummiest scum to ever scum.... makes no sense and is scummy as fuck.Art is cool.-
-
OceanWind Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1237
- Joined: July 16, 2015
In post 1387, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:what the hell... ocean suddenly changing to firebringer after screaming for ranger's head forever...?
I have scumreads on both Firebringer and Ranger. Ranger wagon wasn't going anywhere so I thought the Firebringer one might. His latest posts are also a lot scummier than Ranger's. He's coasting. Ranger's at least posting some content and has some depth of thought process that made me question the read. I explained the first point in my vote switch though. How did you miss it?
In post 1398, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:ocean is grandstanding. flooding the thread with nonsense walls. suddenly there's a phantom wagon on firebringer out of nowhere. that's fuckin suspicious. and ocean just happily switches from ranger, who is supposedly the scummiest scum to ever scum.... makes no sense and is scummy as fuck.
Nice of you to dismiss a wall of content as "nonsense." Are you even bothering to read the game at this point?
The Firebringer wagon is a great one. What did Firebringer do that was town? Where did I call Ranger the "scummiest scum to ever scum?"
You are irritating. I enjoy discussing analysis, not correcting people on facts because that's mundane and not the reason I play mafia. Read the thread, then get back to me.
@Marge- I'll try and explain the Ythan read if I have more time but I haven't found his content as objectionable as Firebringer's and I think you may be confbiasing here.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.