Blitz 5: Netherspite's Blitz SORM Mafia [Game Over]
-
-
hi im Yakko Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1633
- Joined: November 5, 2014
-
-
Professor Bozo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 207
- Joined: June 24, 2015
-
-
Professor Bozo
-
-
hi im Yakko Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1633
- Joined: November 5, 2014
-
-
Professor Bozo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 207
- Joined: June 24, 2015
so far no CC on jenne/far in the power/kill
invest/protect right now
Town Investigative [Smitheerens/yakko/forjelly]
Town Protective [idiot servant/firebringer/kraig]
Town Investigative or Protective
town random
Town Random [aronis/zymf]
yes i realize we have another slot for protect/invest but unill the first gets filled i dont see a reason to put them in-
-
Netherspite Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: September 7, 2014
- Location: Koh Samui
Now modding:Netherspite's SORM Mafia III(Day 2)-
-
Ranger She/Her{Top Tier}She/Her
- {Top Tier}
- {Top Tier}
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: October 7, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
45. Maybe 174.Yakko wrote:Okay but where is hippy trying to claim it?
But I'm willing to give them a pass since they're saying they're not claiming a government role.
VOTE: Aronis.AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgangGame History"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."- RadiantCowbells |"Ranger's been town in most of them."- Plotinus
"Ranger fake claiming? I'm shocked"- usesPython-
-
Ranger She/Her{Top Tier}She/Her
- {Top Tier}
- {Top Tier}
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: October 7, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
Zymf could be scum too, since if it wasn't obvious enough,Zymf wrote:I am Town Government (or random)Iam Town Government, too, and we have too many claims: Mario's proven, I know I'm real, then throw in Zymf and Aronis at minimum and I find that impossible.AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgangGame History"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."- RadiantCowbells |"Ranger's been town in most of them."- Plotinus
"Ranger fake claiming? I'm shocked"- usesPython-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
In post 323, Zymf wrote:
I think it's more scummy to sheep without questioning why. If only I questioned the sheeping, without placing a vote on you, it could be interpreted as an excuse for not wanting to vote for a scumbuddy in the same way as I interpreted your questioning of the massclaim without claiming. Do you understand what I'm getting at?In post 318, Kraeg wrote:In post 315, Zymf wrote:
Well.. ok, if you say so :/In post 311, MarioManiac4 wrote:Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.
VOTE: Kraeg
But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..
This is scummy. You don't think it's good to follow him and yet you followed him???
In a way, being a hypocrite, can make you more town
I don't know if you're deliberately misrepresenting my post or you're just simply dumb. I never criticized the massclaim. What I criticized was Fire being the one who started it while claiming Town Protective. There's a subtle difference between the two.-
-
Kraeg
-
-
Ranger She/Her{Top Tier}She/Her
- {Top Tier}
- {Top Tier}
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: October 7, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
{Mario, Fro99er (yes I know)}
{ForWhomTheJellyRolls, farside22}
{Firebringer, Yakko}
{Smithereens}
{Jeanne, Ywreckt}
{Zymf}
{Dwlee, Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Aronis, Kraeg}
This list could use some updating. I'll take another look at Kraeg before I see if I want that lynch or not.AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgangGame History"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."- RadiantCowbells |"Ranger's been town in most of them."- Plotinus
"Ranger fake claiming? I'm shocked"- usesPython-
-
Ranger She/Her{Top Tier}She/Her
- {Top Tier}
- {Top Tier}
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: October 7, 2015
- Pronoun: She/Her
Well.
I went in not sure what I'd find. What I found: in Kraeg's earlier posting, not much suspicious. It actually looks town in isolation. In Kraeg's later posting, I get more mixed feelings, though. In either case, he's not the bottom-tier of scumread. I'm not sure if I want him lynched or not. Aronis and Idiot Savant (not to mention possibly-scum Zymf) makes me worried, too.
{Mario, Fro99er (yes I know)}
{ForWhomTheJellyRolls, farside22}
{Firebringer, Yakko}
{Smithereens}
{Jeanne, Ywreckt}
{Zymf, Kraeg}
{Dwlee, Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Aronis}.
I'm sorry, but if you want that lynch, you're going to have to do it without me.AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgangGame History"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."- RadiantCowbells |"Ranger's been town in most of them."- Plotinus
"Ranger fake claiming? I'm shocked"- usesPython-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
In post 323, Zymf wrote:
I think it's more scummy to sheep without questioning why.In post 318, Kraeg wrote:In post 315, Zymf wrote:
Well.. ok, if you say so :/In post 311, MarioManiac4 wrote:Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.
VOTE: Kraeg
But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..
This is scummy. You don't think it's good to follow him and yet you followed him???If only I questioned the sheeping, without placing a vote on you, it could be interpreted as an excuse for not wanting to vote for a scumbuddy in the same way as I interpreted your questioning of the massclaim without claiming. Do you understand what I'm getting at?
In a way, being a hypocrite, can make you more town
Seriously? Haven't you considered that it can also be interpreted as a Town trying to think about things first before jumping on the wagon? Or you just see everything at the extremes.
You seem to be paranoid here. First of all, if you questioned it, it doesn't necessarily mean that it means you do not want to vote for a scum buddy. Hell, there isn't even any conclusive evidence that I am scum for someone who didn't vote for me to be interpreted as "not wanting to vote for a scum buddy". That line of accusation will only be used if someone has flipped scum already, and someone showed hesitation in voting for that player who flipped scum. And I haven't flipped scum, and I will not because I have one of the roles under the Town Protective Group. The fact that you seem to be very careful about your actions being interpreted as "not wanting to vote for a scum buddy" is scummy.
You're line of thought is very faulty. You see every scenario in "opposite poles" when in fact, things are not that simple. There are a lot of ways that you can interpret a certain action.
Zymf is clearly scum. Please lynch Zymf.-
-
Zymf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 229
- Joined: January 29, 2015
- Location: In your basement
I never vote without a reason, even in RVS. You can blame me for being a hypocrite, but don't blame me for explaining my reason..
But there is also some similarity.In post 333, Kraeg wrote:In post 323, Zymf wrote:
I think it's more scummy to sheep without questioning why. If only I questioned the sheeping, without placing a vote on you, it could be interpreted as an excuse for not wanting to vote for a scumbuddy in the same way as I interpreted your questioning of the massclaim without claiming. Do you understand what I'm getting at?In post 318, Kraeg wrote:In post 315, Zymf wrote:
Well.. ok, if you say so :/In post 311, MarioManiac4 wrote:Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.
VOTE: Kraeg
But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..
This is scummy. You don't think it's good to follow him and yet you followed him???
In a way, being a hypocrite, can make you more town
I don't know if you're deliberately misrepresenting my post or you're just simply dumb. I never criticized the massclaim. What I criticized was Fire being the one who started it while claiming Town Protective. There's a subtle difference between the two.-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
-
-
Zymf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 229
- Joined: January 29, 2015
- Location: In your basement
I mean, don't blame me for explaining why I have doubt. I haven't yet explained why I still decided to vote for you regardless.In post 338, Zymf wrote:I never vote without a reason, even in RVS. You can blame me for being a hypocrite, but don't blame me for explaining my reason..
I will do that now:
1) I had allready considered voting for you before Mario told me to. This was, as has been explained, because you critized Fire for suggesting a massclaim when he is himself a protective role.
2) I don't have any reason not to lynch you.
3) I don't want to go against Mario's orders, despite the doubts I have about his method.-
-
Jeanne11 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: March 11, 2015
-
-
Kraeg Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 361
- Joined: December 26, 2012
-
-
Smithereens Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: May 12, 2014
- Location: Melbourne
In post 235, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 226, Smithereens wrote:In post 154, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 151, Fro99er wrote:In post 148, hi im Yakko wrote:Although it currently feels like people are just waiting for something to happen.
Is that bad or good?
I was reading blitz game 1 because I was.
Good and Bad imo. Was reading through game 1 of that 2+2 thing were angry pidgeon and dipping were playing in. A lot of peeps there would just multipost like crazy so potential for more mistakes. If that makes sense. But since people are just waiting here then when it comes to lynching we might not be able to decide. Although I am not opposed to random lynching.
In a mass claim game why the fvck would you want to go random lynching?? Especially when you've got a nice sized handful of players who aren't claiming.
Huh? What are you talking about? Saying "I'm not opposed to random lynching" is not meant to be taken as "I want to random lynch today". The nuance is compeletely different. You sound extremely displeased as opposed to annoyed. I would think it would be the latter. Maybe I'm wrong not that it matters all that much yet. (Also what is with the v in fuck?)
haha I don't mean that as an attack, it's an actual question. Under what circumstances would a random lynch be acceptable? and I use V because I normally play mafia on a forum with an auto-censoring on 'fuck' so I just swap u for v.-
-
Smithereens Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: May 12, 2014
- Location: Melbourne
In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.
i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now
Absolutely not standing for this shit. If Mollie is the most suitable lynch target you are going to be a liability to us. You might need to die too if that's the case.-
-
Smithereens Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: May 12, 2014
- Location: Melbourne
-
-
Jeanne11 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3461
- Joined: March 11, 2015
In post 345, Smithereens wrote:I understand we're all sheeping a confirmed townie, but the eagerness gives me doubts.. Why did nobody ask or challenge..?
Because the time is growing short, I think?-
-
hi im Yakko Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1633
- Joined: November 5, 2014
In post 345, Smithereens wrote:I understand we're all sheeping a confirmed townie, but the eagerness gives me doubts.. Why did nobody ask or challenge..?
I'll assume you caught up from this post. Mind giving us a read list?When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye-
-
Fro99er Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 16952
- Joined: April 2, 2015
In post 311, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Kraeg
Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.
Deadline's coming
In post 315, Zymf wrote:
Well.. ok, if you say so :/In post 311, MarioManiac4 wrote:Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.
VOTE: Kraeg
But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..
Wtf is this all about"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend-
-
Smithereens Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: May 12, 2014
- Location: Melbourne
In post 347, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 345, Smithereens wrote:I understand we're all sheeping a confirmed townie, but the eagerness gives me doubts.. Why did nobody ask or challenge..?
I'll assume you caught up from this post. Mind giving us a read list?
Yes, everyone of you is fvcking drunk or high. FB I like, I feel like he def would not be so eager to die as scum to prove a point. The others I'll wait and see. Kraeg I read null, as he raises points but doesn't actually attempt to push. Which is just lackluster. I'll hammer if we run out of time. Otherwise you should probably explain to me why he is the best possible lynch as opposed to the others in his category.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-