Mini #111: Sonic Heroes Mafia (The fighting's over...)
-
-
Jolle Goon
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Since PBuG could make a night kill only once, but remove protections from someone each night, we probably have another vigilante. So we have both a normal vigilante and a one-shot vig (PBuG). Having 2 vigs means that the scum roles are probably quite strong, since otherwise that would be unbalanced (I think).
The other possibility is that some Mafia members have a protection. In this case, the Mafia roles are also stronger than normal, because normally Mafia members don't have any protections. So I think the scum roles are quite strong in this game.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Unvote: Quagmire, as he's being prodded.
Mojo seemed very eager to claim for a Doc (even for a one-time Doc). Normally Docs don't want to claim that fast.
Also, Mojo wasveryinterested about Dragonmasters escape from Eggman:
Maybe Mojo really had Dragonmaster captured, and didn't know how he escaped. It looks like he was quite desperate for information about what happened.Mojo wrote:Did you need to make a night choice in order to escape from Eggman? or did you already blocked someone last night?
Combined with Mathcams post about his claim being very hard to verify, that makes mevote: Mojoagain.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Prince Kael wrote:Perheps we should random waggon another someone?Anotherrandom player? I'm not sure if it is right to just keep on bandwaggoning. Also I'm not sure about Mojo yet. If what Mathcam says is true (about Tails being a back-up live in a Sonic game), then I'll unvote him. Is anyone who can confirm it?
Other than that, I'm waiting now for what Nanook has to say.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Unvote: Mojo
IMO, another random bandwaggon is not a good idea. We have already revealed a role blocker to the Mafia. We're in danger of losing other important roles if we keep on bandwaggoning.
Nanook, is it possible for you to explain yourself a bit more? Is it information you got by your role which makes you so certain? Is it just a feeling you get from reading Prince Kaels posts?Nanook wrote:I don't know what exactly it is about him, but let's just say that I have my reasons for voting him. I wouldn't mind hearing what he has to say in defense even though I am 100 % positive that he is some sort of evil whether it be mafia or not.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
I read the following about the Espio character at the Sonic Heroes website:
Prince Kael's power makes sense with that. On the other hand, it could be that Prince Kael made up his power based on that same site. I think the latter is the case here, so my vote stands.His characteristics include a protruding horn, coiled tail, and a stealth camouflage trick that renders him invisible to enemy eyes allowing him to pass by unnoticed.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Unvote: Prince Kael
I don't think that's the case, since all roles that are revealed now are completely different.Prince Kael wrote:What I believe is that we about three variations of each role.
I agree with Nanook that a no lynch isn't a good idea.
Up to now, all claims except for Mojo's were quite powerful. We have:
- A role blocker (Dragonmaster)
- A one-time Doc (Mojo)
- A cop-type role (Nanook)
- A self-protector (Prince Kael)
I'm quite sure that there is a vigilante out there, because of Pbug's role. Also, there was only one kill this night, which means there probably isn't a serial killer. And this list doesn't include the normal versions of the cop an the doc. Chances are quite high that those are in this game also.
The reason I'm saying all this, is: The town roles are probably very powerful in this game. That can only be balanced by either giving the Mafia a lot of members, or by giving the powerful abilities. And while the town side is powerful, I think not powerful enough to justifiy 4 Mafia members. So my guess is that in this game, the Mafia have some abilities.
Being able to kidnap is one such possible ability. It makes sense this way: Dragonmaster was kidnapped. He blocked Mojo and was released. Really, I think Mojo is our best lynch target today. His claim wasn't very convincing, but only barely believable IMO.
Also, other players already stated that it is time for this day to end. The day has lasted long enough, and I think Mojo is our best alternative for a no lynch.Vote: Mojo-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
You're right; I forgot Pbug in my scheme. But what still bothers me is this: All roles revealed by now are not the normal type of roles. It's very probable that the normal roles (like a normal Cop, a Doc, a Vigilante, etc.) are also in this game. So my point remains valid: This is a very strong setup.Warpdragon wrote:Jolle: what about PBuG?-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Well on page 2, we didn't have any roleclaims. Now however, we have many roles revealed and none of them is from team dark. It could be that from the revealed roles, no one really was from team dark, or it could be that one of the claimed roles is false and actually from team dark. I think the former, because I still think it's more likely that Eggman and/or Robotnik are the evil characters, but maybe this is something to look back on later in the game.araltaln wrote:In any event, my thoughts on the matter are back on page 2, although they're possibly a bit outdated given your apparent ability and opinion-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
I guess that's me. *checks box*araltaln wrote:[On a side note, 13k views?? Whoever's just refreshing the page should click the little "Notify me when a reply is posted" checkbox the next time they post instead ]
It's been almost a day since the day started, but only 1 post so far? Where is everyone???
I agree with Araltaln that the roles who claimed already, should post the info they (possibly) gained. Then we will have something to discuss.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
4 Possibilities:
1. If Nanook is scum and Mathcam is innocent, Nanook must have investagating possibilities, which seems quite unlikely to me, since investigating Mafia is quite rare. This option is very improbable.
2. If Nanook and Mathcam are both scum, Mathcam is sacrificing one of his fellow Mafia to make himself look innocent. Actually I think this is the most probable option.
3. If Nanook is innocent and Mathcam is scum, that means that the members of team dark are probably the scum.
4. If both are innocent, Mathcam is insane or paranoid.
I think we gain more information be lynching Mathcam than by lynching Nanook: If mathcam is innocent, we know Nanook is probably scum. We can lynch him tomorrow. If Mathcam is scum, we know the members of team dark are probably the scum and someone can investigate Nanook tonight.
Vote: Mathcam-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Nanook doesn't get to know abilities, he only gets to know role names. IMO, that is a pro-town abilitiy, since it helps detecting false role claims.Mojo wrote:Nanook has the ability to find a rolename and his ability, hardly an ability which is pro-town, for my opinion, because knowing the rolename and ability is much more useful to the mafia.
This whole game, it has been a question who are the scum roles. Is it Robotnik/Eggman, is it team dark, or is it something different? By lynching Mathcam we will have proof either against or for the 'team dark is scum'-theory. That is very valuable information.Mojo wrote:And that's why lynching Mathcam won't give us a lot of information as you hope.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Mathcam wrote:While I actually agree that you might gain more information by lynching me, I still don't agree that it's the right play. Why? Because you sacrifice a cop by doing so. Lynching a cop to "gain more information" doesn't seem particularly smart, especially when lynching a non-cop will give you almost as much information.Yousay you're a cop. Butwedon't have any certainity. Also, while Nanook isn't a Cop, he does have an investagative role.
You could have made a bad claim on purpose, so you could use that as an argument. Or maybe you just didn't think enough about your claim and are now trying to use that to your advantage.Mathcam wrote: Last, think about it for a second. Though I'll concede that I don't see why Rouge is a cop either, it also doesn't make sense for me to claim cop with such a character. It would have been much smarter for me to appeal to the town as a seemingly evil but actually pro-town regular townie.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
He may be evil, but why would she get insane results because of that? Like others stated, he's good at what she does, and why would being evil change that?Mathcam wrote: I do agree that we should lynch one of the two, but if I had to decide between Rouge between a sane cop or an insane cop (we know he's not paranoid or naive), I'd go insane, just to go with the evil motif.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Well we can let Nanook live and let him prove his role tomorrow. then we will know sure if he really has the role he says he has.
What some of you seem to forget is that if Mathcam is scum, we are in danger of losing two townies. For example: If we lynch Mlaker today and at the time he is lynched we discover he was innocent. Then we will conclude: Mathcam must be a sane Cop. The day after we will lynch Nanook, because of Mathcam's investigation.IfMathcam is scum and he made up his investigations, we will have to sacrifice two townies to discover if he's scum. This example also holds true if we lynch Nanook instead of Mlaker, only will we conclude that Mathcam is insane after day 2.
I don't really think it's worth sacraficing 2 townie, only to discover if Mathcam's scum. In other words: I don't think lynching either Nanook or Mlaker is such a good idea.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
1. I don't believe you're a Cop.Mathcam wrote:This, in combination, has to be one of the worst strings of logic I've ever heard. Consider the possibility that I am a cop (which I am). When you lynch me and discover this, you'll be back to the same scenario of lynching either Nanook or mlaker, and if you lynch wrong, not only will you have lost 2 innocents to finally figure out the scum, but one of the innocents you'll have lynched was your cop!
2. If we lynch you and discover you were a Cop, we have a 50% chance to lynch right. That means that by lynching you (ifyou are innocent) we have a 50% chance to lynch 1 innocent and 1 scum, and a 50% chance to lynch 2 innocents and 1 scum. Which is IMO better than a 100% to lynch 2 innocents and 1 scum.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
I too don't really suspect Mathcam even more, but am not convinced of his innocence either. But consider the following scenario's, both assuming that Mathcam is lying:
1. After sacricing Mlaker, the town believes Mathcam, and concludes he is a sane Cop. The following day we lynch Yoko, who is innocent. Off course, we lynch Mathcam the next day. The Mafia has traded 2 Mafia lynches for 1 innocent lynch.
2. After sacricing Mlaker, the town believes Mathcam, and concludes he is a sane Cop. The following day we lynch Yoko, who is guilty.
Scenario #1 just doesn't make sense. So whether Mathcam is lying or not, Yoko is guilty.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Yoko, please tell us what sanity other than Sane Mathcam could have if he is Cop.Yoko wrote:I am not scum, so sorry mathcam either you are scum and ratted out your godfather or you are a sop whos sanity can be questionable
Nanook said during day 2 that he would do that, so I suggest you reveal at least one of the names:Yoko wrote:I can divulge there names if you wish.Nanook, before Yoko replaced wrote:All I know is that IF I survive through the night, My first post will contain a role name and the player it belongs too.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Why isn't it possible that he is a Mafia member with the ability to get people's names. I know it's not really an anti-town ability, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Yoko is pro-town, does it?Fletcher wrote:I definetly believe Yoko, because he got my role name right and he got three other people's names right.-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
I also still don't believe Mathcam fully, but not because of his 'slip of the tongue'. (I believe anyone, on matter how experienced, can make such mistakes). What bothers me is that he investigated Mafia on nights #1and#2. It just seems a bit too lucky to me to investigate Mafia on night #1 and night #2. Unless off course, he is Mafia and this is a plan...-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
Hmm - I think Arataln is right: There is probably only one scum left, which has to be Eggman. Because of Yoko's/Nanooks ability, we already know that Arataln and Mathcam aren't Eggman. So we shouldn't lynch one of them today.
Combined with the fact that I think we can believe Mathcam now (since he isn't Eggman), I think we have a good chance of catching scum today. (Since Mathcam knows of another innocent).-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
"While Nanook/Yoko was Scum, he did have the ability he claimed to have. And his results have been right during the whole game." - That was what I tought when I made my last post. Now I do realize that he off course wouldn't post that you were Eggman is you were scum together. So indeed, my reasoning wasn't right .arataln wrote:Jolle, your reasoning is flawed, even if it's flawed in my favor: I can't possibly be considered cleared of being Eggman based only on evidence scum has given us.
And off course it happenssometimesthat a Cop investigates 2 Mafia in a row, just not often.
Maybe I missed something, but what is exactly Sporks ability?-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
-
-
Jolle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 184
- Joined: February 12, 2004
- Location: The Netherlands
FoS: Spork76. Why would we NoLynch at this point in the game?
With the setup you gave, there is indeed one scum member per team. However, how can we ever be sure that there is indeed such symmetry? Setups can be (and often are) unpredictable.MMCL wrote:See how this setup allows for all the information given so far to be correct, yet the symmetry of one scum member per team is perfect... it means that araltaln is lying.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.