-TinVision- wrote:@Aimee: Like I said (and provided the
link), recently in Newbie #361, a newbie player by the name of Dr. Blackstrike made a few posts early in the day that were similar to dusterhan's in silliness and caused a lot of confusion. He was eventually lynched, and proved to be town. Thus, even though it's a small sample size, I read dusterhan's early posts as a newb town tell.
I'm alarmed that your willing to judge dusterhan's behaviour on Dr. Blackstrike's behaviour.
Also, everyone has different playstyles. Some people are genuinely unhelpful and aggressive in all their games (for example Fritzler), but that doesn't therefore have any indication of his alignment.
However, since somebody else
did
say that dusterhan wasn't playing like this in another game, I'll be checking out his games to see.
-TinVision- wrote:Regarding Atticus, I find him less scummy/annoying because while there's not much content, he is at least here, reading the thread and responding to posts made that address him.
I agree with your thoughts on Atticus, but disagree with your conclusion 9that he isn't scummy). I'm not really seeing any curiosity from him - he's more reactive than pro-active (same with what I perceived Nekka to be, although now that seems to be explained by real-life reasons), meaning that I sense he's only posting when asked and such like, and not genuinely scum-hunting.
Atticus wrote:Why did joost hop on an N-L vote? The reasoning Aimee gave for voting the latter was weak, in my opinion, simply that he was barely posting any content. However, that joost went to it, and backed off right after N-L asked for a replacement is odd, to me.
No, my case on him is that he isn't
scum-hunting
. This is quite important, since I've seen scum run along not really doing much before. It allows them to remain relatively non-committal about stuff and things.
dusterhan's vote against joost seems rather OMGUS.
Also,
unvote
, since I feel my vote would be wasted while waiting for a replacement. I'll be watching Nekka's replacement carefully, however.