Blitz 18: Wedding Invitational Mafia - GAME OVER

ISO · Post Post #2325 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:48 am

more than the alternatives, i should say?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2326 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:50 am

In post 2323, Natirasha wrote:Hey Nacho, what's your results from last night?

take a wild guess

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2327 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:51 am

if you need a hint, if they were on "Tracking Results Gone Wild", they'd be quintuplets

BROseidon · Post Post #2328 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:58 am

You can't have gotten blocked unless there are 4 scum, though.

It may be Pareto-optimal not to lynch nacho today, but I don't trust you all to understand the math behind why.

BROseidon · Post Post #2329 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:59 am

Also rereading this game on mobile is gonna suckkkkkkkkkk

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2330 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:01 am

In post 2328, BROseidon wrote:You can't have gotten blocked unless there are 4 scum, though.

this isn't true!

ISO · Post Post #2331 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:02 am

it's not that difficult if i accept your premises. do i accept them? meh.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2332 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:03 am

In post 2328, BROseidon wrote:It may be Pareto-optimal not to lynch nacho today, but I don't trust you all to understand the math behind why.

sounds good to me!

BROseidon · Post Post #2333 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:03 am

In post 2330, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 2328, BROseidon wrote:You can't have gotten blocked unless there are 4 scum, though.

this isn't true!

Nothing in the bride/groom pm said anything about the bp being x-shot.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2334 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:05 am

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2335 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:06 am

In post 2302, Cephrir wrote:there is something i'm not getting about this setup. it seems to me that either there must be four scum, or the roleblocker has to somehow also be a strongman? In that case, why wasn't the goon a strongman?

oh lord

ISO · Post Post #2336 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:08 am

ay, there's the rub

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2337 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:10 am

In post 2231, Ms Marangal wrote:
In post 2225, Natirasha wrote:For fact: why haven't scum killed Mara/AP? Both BPs are gone now.

This is a useless question to ask

If you're trying to insinuate that we are scum then that's even more idiotic.

Iso us, both of us.

Ap might be a little more useful but we don't have to explain ourselves

I know that I must do what's right
As sure as Kilimanjaro rises like Olympus above the Serengeti

In post 2234, fferyllt wrote:
Ms Marangal is the Bride and confirmed
Town

AngryPidgeon is the Groom and confirmed
Town

I seek to cure what's deep inside, frightened of this thing that I've become

In post 2247, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Apparently stuff happened in this thread while I was gone. I'll try to catch up from the gym. But also Im guessign that Mara claimed we were both bulletproof. Until we get revealed so we no longer are. So yathis setup is bonkers, no idea what it all means, illuminati420, VOTE: Cephrir

Really sorry and you have had a great scumgame so far ILU but its time to lose.

It's gonna take a lot to drag me away from you
There's nothing that a hundred men or more could ever do

You are also an Innocent Child, or at least, you're pretending to be innocent. Until you or cabd fuck up and have to reveal yourselves as Innocent; you're also bulletproof. How awesome is that?

I bless the rains down in Africa
Gonna take some time to do the things we never had

BROseidon · Post Post #2338 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:12 am

In post 2336, Cephrir wrote:ay, there's the rub

On why it may not be optimal to lynch nacho today:

If there are 3 scum, nacho is confirmed scum. Therefore, in a 3p lylo, he should be auto-lynched.

If there are 4 scum, nacho can still be town.

Basically, lynching nacho today if there are only 3 scum is the same as doing it tomorrow. If there are 4 scum, nacho can still be scum, but I'm not sure if he's the most likely (I want to reread the game)

BROseidon · Post Post #2339 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:13 am

Although the way nacho is starting to troll kind of makes me think he's just scum.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2340 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:14 am

In post 2338, BROseidon wrote:If there are 3 scum, nacho is confirmed scum. Therefore, in a 3p lylo, he should be auto-lynched.

this still isn't true
i was pointing out information you and cephrir missed to the lyrics to africa
which is trolling i guess but productive trolling

BROseidon · Post Post #2341 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:15 am

Oh wait the bp went away.

Why the fuck did they reveal?

BROseidon · Post Post #2342 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:16 am

Whatever, ugh, I'll just reread the fucking game.

ISO · Post Post #2343 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:17 am

no, i didn't miss it -- i just don't understand why it happened

did something force them to reveal?

ISO · Post Post #2344 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:18 am

i mean are they just stupid or ???

i'm talking about there needing to be a strongman from a setup design perspective

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2345 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:33 am

mara revealed because natirasha thought they might have been scum

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2346 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:34 am

i don't think it makes sense for their to be a strongman from a setup design perspective
if there is a strongman, it also makes yesterday night's no kill make absolutely no sense

Natirasha · Post Post #2347 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:35 am

What? No I didn't. I distinctly said that it's obvious they were the B+G so why weren't they dead yet.

Natirasha · Post Post #2348 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:35 am

Also, missed the BP aspect. Hm.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #2349 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:37 am

In post 2347, Natirasha wrote:What? No I didn't. I distinctly said that it's obvious they were the B+G so why weren't they dead yet.

that's why she revealed though