Blitz 17: Netherspite's Blitz SORM II [Game over]

Ranger · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:54 pm

Aristophanes wrote:Ranger, how does your readslist work?

Guess.

Ranger · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:55 pm

{Errantparabola}
{3dice}
{Sensei, Aristophanes}
{hi im Yakko}
{AlwaysInnocent, AxleGreaser}

3dicerolling · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:55 pm

In post 22, Sensei wrote:
In post 19, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 5, Sensei wrote:First.

I'm town. Discuss.

Scum detected.

VOTE: sensei

Somebody cleary can't read.

I'm 1-shot daycop. Get wrecked son

Ranger · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:00 pm

Seems legit.

3dicerolling · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:04 pm

Please don't be jester again ranger

Ranger · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:05 pm

But being jester is a great way to get nightkilled!

3dicerolling · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:08 pm

In post 30, Ranger wrote:But being jester is a great way to get nightkilled!

True.

Care to sheep my 1-shot daycop? It's about as real as your vote will be!

Ranger · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:14 pm

But a vote on Sensei is a vote not on me! :(

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:39 pm

Last time when Ranger townread me, she was town.

Now Ranger seems to scumread me. Therefore, she is scum.

QED. Flawless logic. You can thank me later.

3dicerolling · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:39 pm

Ranger is actually prob town.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:40 pm

No, she is scum. I already concluded that logically.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:41 pm

Hmmmmm nvm I like my ai vote. I assume the chumminess is from past experience? It felt odd coning from ranger lol.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:42 pm

Yakko disagrees.

Therefore he is scum too.

Sensei · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:42 pm

In post 32, Ranger wrote:But a vote on Sensei is a vote for evil.

fixd

3dicerolling · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:43 pm

In post 36, hi im Yakko wrote:Hmmmmm nvm I like my ai vote. I assume the chumminess is from past experience? It felt odd coning from ranger lol.

Probably jester.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:43 pm

Also 3dice are you being srs about the day cop?

3dicerolling · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:45 pm

In post 31, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 30, Ranger wrote:But being jester is a great way to get nightkilled!

True.

Care to sheep my 1-shot daycop?
It's about as real as your vote will be
!

Here yakko. You should sheep it anyway.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:48 pm

VOTE: sensei

I was like ranger skeptical. Also I'm town power. I should have mentioned this game is breakable. Ika will say the same thing.

3dicerolling · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:51 pm

In post 42, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: sensei

I was like ranger skeptical. Also I'm town power. I should have mentioned this game is breakable. Ika will say the same thing.

So we shouldn't protect our roles, but massclaim?

Sensei · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:53 pm

This is essentially n0. If we're massclaiming it should probs wait.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:54 pm

In post 43, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 42, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: sensei

I was like ranger skeptical. Also I'm town power. I should have mentioned this game is breakable. Ika will say the same thing.

So we shouldn't protect our roles, but massclaim?

Basically. Last game there was push back so we just softed and filled in the blanks via flips. Of course we did catch several scum early.

AxleGreaser · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:12 pm

In post 44, Sensei wrote:This is essentially n0. If we're massclaiming it should probs wait.

That would be a yes.

In post 45, hi im Yakko wrote:
In post 43, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 42, hi im Yakko wrote:VOTE: sensei

I was like ranger skeptical. Also I'm town power. I should have mentioned this game is breakable. Ika will say the same thing.

So we shouldn't protect our roles, but massclaim?

Basically. Last game there was push back so we just softed and filled in the blanks via flips. Of course we did catch several scum early.

Did you catch them by the mass claim itself or by reading their reaction to it?
I saw that the town lynched bunch (2/3) neutral anti town roles but, while I didn't read the game thoroughly, I didn't quite see how the mass claim itself directly and causally lead to that outcome.

In this game, there is one less well defined role

In post 583, Netherspite wrote:One town slot will be excluded (Town Investigative/Protective).

so there is a lower potential for alignment indicative stuff from slot category claims.

and other stuff...

AxleGreaser · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:20 pm

In this game, there is one less well defined role

In post 583, Netherspite wrote:One town slot will be excluded (Town Investigative/Protective).

so there is a lower potential for alignment indicative stuff from slot category claims.

and other stuff...

correction two less well defined roles

In post 2, Netherspite wrote:

Town Government

Town Investigative

Town Protective
/
Town Investigative or Protective

Town Investigative or Protective

Town Killing or Power

Town Killing or Power

Town Random
Town Random
Town Random

...

hi im Yakko · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:32 pm

@axle I would respond but I am no good at setup spec so you'll have to wait for ika.

AxleGreaser · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Fri Jan 08, 2016 5:48 pm

In post 21, Ranger wrote:
Errantparabola wrote:Oh jeez what will ranger do without those sweet rvs votes?
Aint no rule says that I can't RVS-read!

@Ranger
before you made that post..
Had you seen any of my other games?